Literature DB >> 18278600

The biomechanics of human ribs: material and structural properties from dynamic tension and bending tests.

Andrew R Kemper1, Craig McNally, Clayton A Pullins, Laura J Freeman, Stefan M Duma, Stephen M Rouhana.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to quantify both the tensile material properties and structural response of human ribs in order to determine which variables contribute to regional variation in the strength of human ribs. This was done by performing 94 matched tests on human rib specimens; 46 tension coupon tests, 48 three-point bending tests. Contralateral matched specimens were dissected from anterior and lateral regions of ribs 4 through 7 of six male fresh frozen post mortem human subjects ranging from 42 to 81 years of age. Tension coupons were taken from one side of the thorax, while three-point bending specimens were taken from the opposite side as the tension coupons at corresponding anatomical locations. The results of the tension coupon testing showed that there were no significant differences with respect to region or rib level: ultimate stress (p=0.90; p=0.53), ultimate strain (p=0.49; p=0.86), or modulus (p=0.72; p=0.81). In contrast, lateral three-point bending specimens were found to have a significantly higher peak bending moment (p<0.01), peak strain (p=0.03), modulus (p=0.05), and stiffness (p<0.01) than anterior specimens. The lateral three-point bending specimens also had a significantly larger area moment of inertia (p<0.01), larger distance to the neutral axis (p<0.01), smaller ratio of distance to the neutral axis to area moment of inertia (p<0.01), larger cortical bone area (p<0.01), and larger radius of gyration (p<0.01) than the anterior specimens. In addition, the peak moment (Ant p=0.20; Lat p=0.02), peak strain (Ant p=0.05; Lat p=0.15), and stiffness (Ant p<0.01; Lat p<0.01) were found to vary significantly with respect to rib level. Similar to anatomical region, the changes in the structural response with respect to rib level were also accompanied by significant changes in geometry. For anterior specimens, distance to the neutral axis (p<0.01), ratio of the distance to the neutral axis to area moment of inertia (p=0.02) and radius of gyration (p=0.04) were found to be significantly different with respect to rib level. For lateral specimens, the area moment of inertia (p<0.01), distance to the neutral axis (p<0.01), ratio of the distance to the neutral axis to area moment of inertia (p<0.01), the cortical bone area (p=0.01), and radius of gyration (p=0.03) were found to be significantly different with respect to rib level. These results clearly illustrate that there is variation in the structural response of human ribs with respect to anatomical region and rib level and this variation is due to changes in local geometry of each rib while the material properties remain constant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18278600     DOI: 10.4271/2007-22-0011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J        ISSN: 1532-8546


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical response of human liver in tensile loading.

Authors:  Andrew R Kemper; Anthony C Santago; Joel D Stitzel; Jessica L Sparks; Stefan M Duma
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2010

2.  The effect of age and demographics on rib shape.

Authors:  Sven A Holcombe; Stewart C Wang; James B Grotberg
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Abdominal Organ Location, Morphology, and Rib Coverage for the 5(th), 50(th), and 95(th) Percentile Males and Females in the Supine and Seated Posture using Multi-Modality Imaging.

Authors:  Ashley R Hayes; F Scott Gayzik; Daniel P Moreno; R Shayn Martin; Joel D Stitzel
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2013

4.  Predicting rib fracture risk with whole-body finite element models: development and preliminary evaluation of a probabilistic analytical framework.

Authors:  Jason L Forman; Richard W Kent; Krystoffer Mroz; Bengt Pipkorn; Ola Bostrom; Maria Segui-Gomez
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2012

5.  Rib Geometry Explains Variation in Dynamic Structural Response: Potential Implications for Frontal Impact Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Michelle M Murach; Yun-Seok Kang; Samuel D Goldman; Michelle A Schafman; Stephen H Schlecht; Kevin Moorhouse; John H Bolte; Amanda M Agnew
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Comparing rib cortical thickness measurements from computed tomography (CT) and Micro-CT.

Authors:  Zachary S Hostetler; Joel D Stitzel; Ashley A Weaver
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.589

7.  Stiffness reduction of the rib cage to perform a minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair: biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Ángel Gabriel Vega-Artiles; David Pérez; Oscar Martel; Alberto Cuadrado; Alejandro Yánez
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-02

8.  Morphometric analysis of variation in the ribs with age and sex.

Authors:  Ashley A Weaver; Samantha L Schoell; Joel D Stitzel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Development of a socket-type rib coaptation device made of poly-L-lactide fibers: feasibility study in a canine model.

Authors:  Teruya Komatsu; Toshihiko Sato; Yasuto Sakaguchi; Yusuke Muranishi; Yojiro Yutaka; Hiroshi Date; Tatsuo Nakamura
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Rib Cortical Bone Fracture Risk as a Function of Age and Rib Strain: Updated Injury Prediction Using Finite Element Human Body Models.

Authors:  Karl-Johan Larsson; Amanda Blennow; Johan Iraeus; Bengt Pipkorn; Nils Lubbe
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.