Literature DB >> 18278193

The use of the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care device to monitor platelet function across a range of P2Y12 inhibition levels following prasugrel and clopidogrel administration.

Joseph A Jakubowski1, Christopher D Payne, Ying G Li, John T Brandt, David S Small, Nagy A Farid, Daniel E Salazar, Kenneth J Winters.   

Abstract

Variability in response to antiplatelet agents has prompted the development of point-of-care (POC) technology. In this study, we compared the VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN-P2Y12) POC device with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in subjects switched directly from clopidogrel to prasugrel. Healthy subjects on aspirin were administered a clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose (LD) followed by a 75 mg/d maintenance dose (MD) for 10 days. Subjects were then switched to a prasugrel 60 mg LD and then 10 mg/d MD for 10 days (n = 16), or to a prasugrel 10 mg/d MD for 11 days (n = 19). Platelet function was measured by LTA and VN-P2Y12 at baseline and after dosing. Clopidogrel 600 mg LD/75 mg MD treatment led to a reduction in P2Y(12) reaction units (PRU) from baseline. A switch from clopidogrel MD to prasugrel 60 mg LD/10 mg MD produced an immediate decrease in PRU, while a switch to prasugrel 10 mg MD resulted in a more gradual decline. Consistent with the reduction in PRU, device-reported percent inhibition increased during both clopidogrel and prasugrel regimens. Inhibition of platelet aggregation as measured by LTA showed a very similar pattern to that found with VN-P2Y12 measurement, irrespective of treatment regimens. The dynamic range of VN-P2Y12 appeared to be narrower than that of LTA. With two different thienopyridines, the VN-P2Y12 device, within a somewhat more limited range, reflected the overall magnitude of change in aggregation response determined by LTA. The determination of the clinical utility of such POC devices will require their use in clinical outcome studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18278193     DOI: 10.1160/TH07-09-0575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  31 in total

1.  Correlation of high post-treatment platelet reactivity assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.

Authors:  In-Suk Kim; Young-Hoon Jeong; Min-Kyung Kang; Jin-Sin Koh; Yongwhi Park; Seok-Jae Hwang; Choong Hwan Kwak; Jin-Yong Hwang; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Inhibition of platelet aggregation by prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) in diabetic patients during therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin.

Authors:  Rolf P Kreutz; Perry Nystrom; Yvonne Kreutz; Jia Miao; Richard Kovacs; Zeruesenay Desta; David A Flockhart; Yan Jin
Journal:  Platelets       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 3.  Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel.

Authors:  David S Small; Nagy A Farid; Christopher D Payne; Christopher S Konkoy; Joseph A Jakubowski; Kenneth J Winters; Daniel E Salazar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Monitoring the effectiveness of antiplatelet therapy: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Nalyaka Sambu; Nick Curzen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Platelet function testing and tailored antiplatelet therapy.

Authors:  Paul W A Janssen; Jurriën M ten Berg
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) mediated platelet aggregation is dependent on clopidogrel response.

Authors:  Rolf P Kreutz; Jeffrey A Breall; Yvonne Kreutz; Janelle Owens; Deshun Lu; Islam Bolad; Elisabeth von der Lohe; Anjan Sinha; David A Flockhart
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.944

7.  Higher body weight patients on clopidogrel maintenance therapy have lower active metabolite concentrations, lower levels of platelet inhibition, and higher rates of poor responders than low body weight patients.

Authors:  Henrik Wagner; Dominick J Angiolillo; Jurrien M Ten Berg; Thomas O Bergmeijer; Joseph A Jakubowski; David S Small; Brian A Moser; Chunmei Zhou; Patricia Brown; Stefan James; Kenneth J Winters; David Erlinge
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Monitoring aspirin and clopidogrel response: testing controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Athanasios Karathanos; Tobias Geisler
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.074

9.  Comparison of platelet inhibition by prasugrel versus ticagrelor over time in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Leor Perl; Noa Zemer-Wassercug; Eldad Rechavia; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Katia Orvin; Adaya Weissler-Snir; Hila Lerman-Shivek; Ran Kornowski; Eli I Lev
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Nicholas B Norgard; Mazen Abu-Fadel
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.