Literature DB >> 18277879

A novel technique of intra-spinous process injection of PMMA to augment the strength of an inter-spinous process device such as the X STOP.

Cary Idler1, James F Zucherman, Scott Yerby, Ken Y Hsu, Matthew Hannibal, Dimitriy Kondrashov.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Biomechanical.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if cement injection into the spinous process will improve compression strength. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The X STOP (St. Francis Medical Technologies) has been shown to be a safe and effective means for decompressing 1- or 2-level lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The X STOP is indicated for LSS patients with osteoporosis, but contraindicated for patients with severe osteoporosis. In an attempt to address these LSS patients with demonstrably weaker bone, a technique to strengthen the spinous process with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) injection is presented.
METHODS: Nine pairs of adjacent fresh frozen cadaveric lumbar vertebrae were DEXA scanned before testing. They were randomly assigned to the PMMA group and a control group. Nine of the specimens were injected with PMMA. Each spinous process was then compressed between 2 X STOPs. The testing model was designed to simulate the loading of a 2-level X STOP placement. The mean load to failure and stiffness values of the treated and untreated groups were calculated. The specimens were inspected carefully for PMMA infiltration and extrusion.
RESULTS: The mean bone mineral density (BMD) values of the control and PMMA treatment groups were 0.99 +/- 0.13 g/cm and 0.98 +/- 0.10 g/cm, respectively; P > 0.616. The mean volume of cement injected was 2.2 +/- 0.3 cc. The mean failure load values of the control and PMMA treatment groups were 1250 +/- 627 N and 2386 +/- 1034 N, respectively; P < 0.001. The mean stiffness values of the control and PMMA treatment groups were 296 +/- 139 N/mm and 381 +/- 131 N/mm, respectively; P > 0.059. Most specimens had flow of the cement into the laminae and some into the facet and pedicle. No PMMA was found within the spinal canal.
CONCLUSION: This first reported technique of posterior element vertebroplasty may increase the indications and success for patients with decreased BMD who seek an interspinous implant such as the X STOP. A possible role may exist in increasing the effectiveness of such devices. However, clinical trials have yet been performed. These results demonstrate that PMMA injection in the spinous processes is effective in increasing resistance to compressive forces in an X STOP model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18277879     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318163e06d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Computed tomography measurements of the lumbar spinous processes and interspinous space.

Authors:  Rolf Sobottke; Timmo Koy; Marc Röllinghoff; Jan Siewe; Thomas Kreitz; Daniel Müller; Christopher Bangard; Peer Eysel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of the X-Stop device for surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Zongmiao Wan; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozánek; Peter G Passias; Frederick L Mansfield; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2012-10

3.  Diagnostic performance of the nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guangye Wang; Zhan Peng; Jin Li; Zukun Song; Pu Wang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Posterior vertebral arch cement augmentation (spinoplasty) to prevent fracture of spinous processes after interspinous spacer implant.

Authors:  G Bonaldi; G Bertolini; A Marrocu; A Cianfoni
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  [Percutaneous interspinous distraction for the treatment of dynamic lumbar spinal stenosis and low back pain].

Authors:  H Michael Mayer; Florian Zentz; Christoph Siepe; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Clinical Symposium II: Interspinous-based Dynamic Stabilization.

Authors:  Dieter Adelt; Jean Taylor; James Zucherman; Neel Anand
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-09-01

7.  A Novel, Minimally-Invasive Approach to Repair Degenerative Disk Disease in an Ovine Model Using Injectable Polymethyl-Methacrylate and Bovine Collagen (PMMA/BC).

Authors:  Reid Hoshide; Erica Feldman; Anisha Narayan; William Taylor
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-08-08

Review 8.  Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Roberto Gazzeri; Marcelo Galarza; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.