Literature DB >> 18277861

Neurophysiological evidence of antidromic activation of large myelinated fibres in lower limbs during spinal cord stimulation.

Michelangelo Buonocore1, Cesare Bonezzi, Giancarlo Barolat.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study was designed to verify the hypothesis of a constant, antidromic activation of fibers traveling along peripheral sensory nerves during spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the neurophysiological characteristics (latency, amplitude, waveform) of potentials recorded in peripheral sensory nerves during the SCS. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: SCS is widely used for the relief of chronic benign pain resistant to conservative therapies, but its antalgic mechanism is poorly understood. Antidromic activation of peripheral nerve fibers is one of the hypothesized antalgic mechanisms, but very few neurophysiological studies have been conducted on this subject.
METHODS: Sixteen patients undergoing a percutaneous test trial of SCS for chronic pain in the lower limb (4 males, 12 females, mean age of 54.2, and age range 41-77 years) were enrolled. Diagnoses included: failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome type I, painful lumbosacral radiculopathy, and painful peripheral neuropathy. All patients had a lead percutaneously implanted in the epidural space at a vertebral level ranging from T9-T12. Nerve action potentials were generally recorded in nonpainful leg but, when the pain was outside the investigated nerve territory, a bilateral recording was performed. Twenty-one different studies were carried out on 16 patients.
RESULTS: The results confirmed the hypothesis that cutaneous afferents were regularly activated by SCS.
CONCLUSION: The authors hypothesize that this antidromic activation could represent a possible antalgic mechanism of SCS in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain, but further neurophysiological studies will be needed to elucidate this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18277861     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181642a97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation: a review.

Authors:  Aaron K Compton; Binit Shah; Salim M Hayek
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  Spinal cord stimulation: neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Yun Guan
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2012-06

Review 3.  Principles of electrical stimulation and dorsal column mapping as it relates to spinal cord stimulation: an overview.

Authors:  Chitra Ramasubbu; Artemus Flagg; Kayode Williams
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2013-02

4.  Targeting bladder function with network-specific epidural stimulation after chronic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  April N Herrity; Sevda C Aslan; Samineh Mesbah; Ricardo Siu; Karthik Kalvakuri; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Ahmad Mohamed; Charles H Hubscher; Susan J Harkema
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Quantum Mechanical Aspects in the Pathophysiology of Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Sager Nawafleh; Abdallah Barjas Qaswal; Obada Alali; Fuad Mohammed Zayed; Ahmed Mahmoud Al-Azzam; Khaled Al-Kharouf; Mo'ath Bani Ali; Moath Ahmad Albliwi; Rawan Al-Hamarsheh; Mohammad Iswaid; Ahmad Albanna; Ahmad Enjadat; Mohammad Abu Orabi Al-Adwan; Khaled Dibbeh; Ez-Aldeen Abu Shareah; Anas Hamdan; Aiman Suleiman
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 6.  Spinal Cord Stimulation: Clinical Efficacy and Potential Mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrei D Sdrulla; Yun Guan; Srinivasa N Raja
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Treatment of pain post-brachial plexus injury using high-frequency spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Daniela Floridia; Francesco Cerra; Giuseppe Guzzo; Silvia Marino; Nunzio Muscarà; Francesco Corallo; Alessia Bramanti; Antonino Chillura; Antonino Naro
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.133

8.  Electrical spinal cord stimulation must preserve proprioception to enable locomotion in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Emanuele Formento; Karen Minassian; Fabien Wagner; Jean Baptiste Mignardot; Camille G Le Goff-Mignardot; Andreas Rowald; Jocelyne Bloch; Silvestro Micera; Marco Capogrosso; Gregoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, acupuncture, and spinal cord stimulation on neuropathic, inflammatory and, non-inflammatory pain in rat models.

Authors:  Karina Laurenti Sato; Luciana Sayuri Sanada; Morgana Duarte da Silva; Rodrigo Okubo; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2020-04-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.