Literature DB >> 18274328

Increasing uptake of physical activity: a social ecological approach.

Thomas Cochrane1, Rachel Caroline Davey.   

Abstract

AIMS: Increasing population physical activity (PA) is a public health priority. An approach to increasing PA in an urban community, based on the social ecology model, is presented and evaluated.
METHODS: A quasi-experimental (non-equivalent control group) design was chosen to test whether this approach can increase, significantly, the population proportion that is physically active. Two deprived inner-city electoral ward areas of Sheffield, UK, with similar socio-demographic and health profiles were selected. Implementation was carried out in five phases over 21 months: preparation and piloting, initial survey estimates, community awareness campaign, PA intervention and evaluation. Impact was evaluated by recording uptake and attendance at all sessions, and using a post-intervention postal survey. At follow-up, questionnaires were sent to 2500 randomly selected addresses in both areas, which assessed changes in PA, health and PA participation over the last year.
RESULTS: A pilot baseline survey confirmed similar proportions taking some form of PA on most days: intervention 36% (25-47), control 33% (21-45). At follow-up, 38 different activity groups were in place and 1275 individuals had attended at least one activity. Satisfactorily completed responses were received from 1532 (31%), 55% (846) intervention, 45% (686) control. Relative to the control, the intervention sample demonstrated trends towards: being more physically active compared with one year ago, greater readiness to take up PA, better general health and improved health compared with one year ago (p < or = 0.001). Further, 30.6% (intervention) vs 18.3% (control) reported an increase in PA compared with one year ago, while 13.7% (intervention) vs 24.5% (control) reported no intention to exercise. These differences in proportions translated to an overall effect size estimate of 0.23 for the intervention. Relative to those whose PA had remained the same, intervention area residents were more likely to report being more active (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.79 (1.38-2.32), p < 60; 0.001).
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that, even within one of the most deprived inner-city areas in the UK, a community-based social ecological approach can positively change PA behaviour and attitudes.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18274328     DOI: 10.1177/1466424007085223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Promot Health        ISSN: 1466-4240


  15 in total

1.  Talking the talk, walking the walk: examining the effect of neighbourhood walkability and social connectedness on physical activity.

Authors:  Andrew T Kaczynski; Troy D Glover
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  Updating the FORECAST formative evaluation approach and some implications for ameliorating theory failure, implementation failure, and evaluation failure.

Authors:  Jason Katz; Abraham Wandersman; Robert M Goodman; Sarah Griffin; Dawn K Wilson; Michael Schillaci
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2013-03-28

3.  Fe en Accion/Faith in Action: Design and implementation of a church-based randomized trial to promote physical activity and cancer screening among churchgoing Latinas.

Authors:  Elva M Arredondo; Jessica Haughton; Guadalupe X Ayala; Donald J Slymen; James F Sallis; Kari Burke; Christina Holub; Dayana Chanson; Lilian G Perez; Rodrigo Valdivia; Sherry Ryan; John Elder
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  A church-based intervention to change attitudes about physical activity among Black adolescent girls: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Wanda M Thompson; Diane Berry; Jie Hu
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 1.462

5.  Developing a Community-Based Tailored Exercise Program for People With Severe and Persistent Mental Illness.

Authors:  Kamden D Hoffmann; Adrienne Walnoha; Jennifer Sloan; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Hsin-Hui Huang; Jeffrey Borrebach; Patricia A Cluss; Jessica G Burke
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2015

6.  School related factors and 1yr change in physical activity amongst 9-11 year old English schoolchildren.

Authors:  Joyce A Mantjes; Andrew P Jones; Kirsten Corder; Natalia R Jones; Flo Harrison; Simon J Griffin; Esther M F van Sluijs
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 7.  Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.

Authors:  Philip R A Baker; Daniel P Francis; Jesus Soares; Alison L Weightman; Charles Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-05

8.  Residents' diverse perspectives of the impact of neighbourhood renewal on quality of life and physical activity engagement: improvements but unresolved issues.

Authors:  J C Coulson; K R Fox; D A Lawlor; T Trayers
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.078

9.  The impact and process of a community-led intervention on reducing environmental inequalities related to physical activity and healthy eating - a pilot study.

Authors:  Rachel C Davey; Gemma L Hurst; Graham R Smith; Sarah C Grogan; Judy Kurth
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Physical activity and the rejuvenation of Connswater (PARC study): protocol for a natural experiment investigating the impact of urban regeneration on public health.

Authors:  Mark A Tully; Ruth F Hunter; Helen McAneney; Margaret E Cupples; Michael Donnelly; Geraint Ellis; George Hutchinson; Lindsay Prior; Michael Stevenson; Frank Kee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.