Elva M Arredondo1, Jessica Haughton2, Guadalupe X Ayala2, Donald J Slymen2, James F Sallis3, Kari Burke2, Christina Holub2, Dayana Chanson2, Lilian G Perez2, Rodrigo Valdivia4, Sherry Ryan5, John Elder2. 1. Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, Institute for Behavioral and Community Health (IBACH), San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: earredon@mail.sdsu.edu. 2. Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, Institute for Behavioral and Community Health (IBACH), San Diego, CA, USA. 3. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, Active Living Research, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. Diocese of San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA. 5. School of Public Affairs, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe both conditions of a two-group randomized trial, one that promotes physical activity and one that promotes cancer screening, among churchgoing Latinas. The trial involves promotoras (community health workers) targeting multiple levels of the Ecological Model. This trial builds on formative and pilot research findings. DESIGN:Sixteen churches were randomly assigned to either the physical activity intervention or cancer screening comparison condition (approximately 27 women per church). In both conditions, promotoras from each church intervened at the individual- (e.g., beliefs), interpersonal- (e.g., social support), and environmental- (e.g., park features and access to health care) levels to affect change on target behaviors. MEASUREMENTS: The study's primary outcome is min/wk of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at baseline and 12 and 24 months following implementation of intervention activities. We enrolled 436 Latinas (aged 18-65 years) who engaged in less than 250 min/wk of MVPA at baseline as assessed by accelerometer, attended church at least four times per month, lived near their church, and did not have a health condition that could prevent them from participating in physical activity. Participants were asked to complete measures assessing physical activity and cancer screening as well as their correlates at 12- and 24-months. SUMMARY: Findings from the current study will address gaps in research by showing the long term effectiveness of multi-level faith-based interventions promoting physical activity and cancer screening among Latino communities.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To describe both conditions of a two-group randomized trial, one that promotes physical activity and one that promotes cancer screening, among churchgoing Latinas. The trial involves promotoras (community health workers) targeting multiple levels of the Ecological Model. This trial builds on formative and pilot research findings. DESIGN: Sixteen churches were randomly assigned to either the physical activity intervention or cancer screening comparison condition (approximately 27 women per church). In both conditions, promotoras from each church intervened at the individual- (e.g., beliefs), interpersonal- (e.g., social support), and environmental- (e.g., park features and access to health care) levels to affect change on target behaviors. MEASUREMENTS: The study's primary outcome is min/wk of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at baseline and 12 and 24 months following implementation of intervention activities. We enrolled 436 Latinas (aged 18-65 years) who engaged in less than 250 min/wk of MVPA at baseline as assessed by accelerometer, attended church at least four times per month, lived near their church, and did not have a health condition that could prevent them from participating in physical activity. Participants were asked to complete measures assessing physical activity and cancer screening as well as their correlates at 12- and 24-months. SUMMARY: Findings from the current study will address gaps in research by showing the long term effectiveness of multi-level faith-based interventions promoting physical activity and cancer screening among Latino communities.
Authors: Marci Kramish Campbell; Marlyn Allicock Hudson; Ken Resnicow; Natasha Blakeney; Amy Paxton; Monica Baskin Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2007 Impact factor: 21.981
Authors: Elva Arredondo; Kristin Mueller; Elizabeth Mejia; Tanya Rovira-Oswalder; Dana Richardson; Tracy Hoos Journal: Health Promot Pract Date: 2013-01-29
Authors: Paul D Sorlie; Larissa M Avilés-Santa; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Robert C Kaplan; Martha L Daviglus; Aida L Giachello; Neil Schneiderman; Leopoldo Raij; Gregory Talavera; Matthew Allison; Lisa Lavange; Lloyd E Chambless; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jacqueline Kerr; Dori E Rosenberg; Andrea Nathan; Rachel A Millstein; Jordan A Carlson; Katie Crist; Kari Wasilenko; Khalisa Bolling; Cynthia M Castro; David M Buchner; Simon J Marshall Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sandra H Soto; Stephanie Sanz; Kathleen M Merchant; Jeanne F Nichols; Elva M Arredondo Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Ana Cristina Lindsay; Sherrie F Wallington; Luísa M Rabello; Amanda De Sá Melo Alves; Carlos André Moura Arruda; Thaís C Rocha; Gabriela P De Andrade; Gabriela V B Vianna; Raquel de Souza Mezzavilla; Mariana Gonçalves de Oliveira; Maria Helena Hasselmann; Márcia M T Machado; Mary L Greaney Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2020-05-26
Authors: Elva M Arredondo; John P Elder; Jessica Haughton; Donald J Slymen; James F Sallis; Lilian G Perez; Natalicio Serrano; Maíra T Parra; Rodrigo Valdivia; Guadalupe X Ayala Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 9.308