| Literature DB >> 18273406 |
Sara E Dover1, Alla A Aroutcheva, S Faro, Michael L Chikindas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of the antimicrobial peptide, lactocin 160.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18273406 PMCID: PMC2216118 DOI: 10.1155/2007/78248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol ISSN: 1064-7449
ET-50 values of products using the EpiVaginal tissue model (mean standard deviation).
| Product and active ingredient | ET-50 (h) |
|---|---|
| Lactocin 160 (200 mg/mL) |
|
| Spermicide | |
| Nonoxynol 9 (4%) |
|
| Antifungal cream | |
| Miconazole nitrate (4%) |
|
Figure 1Lactocin 160 preparation is not toxic for human vaginal cells as tested in EpiVaginal tissue (VEC-100) model. The presented data illustrate %viability versus time (hours) for following preparations: , nonoxynol 9 (4%); , lactocin 160 (200 mg/mL); , miconazole nitrate (4%).
Hemolytic activity of lactocin 160.
| Substance | Lactocin 160 (mg/mL) | N9 (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration | 200 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 12.5 | 1–4 |
|
| ||||||
| Hemolytic activity (% of control) |
|
|
|
| 0 | 100 |
Individual vaginal irritation and histopathology scores. Histopathology scores include evaluation of epithelium, leukocytes infiltration, vascular congestion, and edema.
| Average score | Vaginal discharge/erythema | Histopathology score (Group mean) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||
| Day | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 |
| Distill water ( | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 5.2 |
| N-9 ( | 0.0/0.0 | 0.3/0.5 | 0.3/0.5 | 0.3/0.7 | 0.3/0.7 | 0.8/1.0 | 1.2/1.0 | 1.0/1.3 | 1.7/1.5 | 1.3/1.3 | 10.5 |
| Lactocin 160 ( | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.2 | 0.0/0.2 | 0.0/0.2 | 0.3/0.3 | 0.3/0.3 | 0.3/0.3 | 0.3/0.3 | 5.7 |