Literature DB >> 18272471

Prospective evaluation of selection criteria for active surveillance in Japanese patients with stage T1cN0M0 prostate cancer.

Yoshiyuki Kakehi1, Toshiyuki Kamoto, Taizou Shiraishi, Osamu Ogawa, Yoshimi Suzukamo, Shunichi Fukuhara, Yuko Saito, Ken-Ichi Tobisu, Tadao Kakizoe, Taro Shibata, Haruhiko Fukuda, Koichiro Akakura, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Nobuo Shinohara, Shin Egawa, Akira Irie, Takefumi Sato, Osamu Maeda, Norio Meguro, Yoshiteru Sumiyoshi, Takanori Suzuki, Nobuaki Shimizu, Yoichi Arai, Akito Terai, Tetsuro Kato, Tomonori Habuchi, Hiroyuki Fujimoto, Masashi Niwakawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Selection criteria for active surveillance (AS) program of localized prostate cancer remain to be standardized. The purpose was to evaluate the validity of selection criteria and investigate the feasibility of this AS program.
METHODS: Patients meeting the criteria (i) stage T1cN0M0, (ii) age 50-80, (iii) serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) </=20 ng/ml, (iv) one or two positive cores per 6-12 systematic biopsy cores, (v) Gleason score </=6, and (vi) cancer involvement in positive core </=50% were enrolled and encouraged to start AS for at least 6 months during the period between January 2002 and December 2003. PSA was measured bimonthly for 6 months and every 3 months thereafter. Trigger of treatment recommendation was PSA-doubling time (PSADT) of </=2 years or pathological progression at re-biopsy. Primary endpoint was '%PSADT > 2y', which was defined as the proportion of patients who showed PSADT assessed at 6 months >2 years out of all the patients who chose AS. Point estimate of '%PSADT > 2y' was expected to be >80%.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighteen patients opted for AS and 16 chose immediate treatment at enrollment. PSADT for the initial 6 months based on four measurements could be assessed in 106 patients. Intent-to-treat analysis of '%PSADT > 2y' was 71.2% (84/118, 95% CI: 62.1-79.2). Pathological progression rate at 1-year re-biopsy was 33%. Fifty-four (46%) patients remained on AS for maximal observation of 54 months. General health-related QOL in patients undergoing AS was not impaired.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary endpoint, '%PSADT > 2y', did not meet the pre-specified decision criteria. Further prospective study with revised program and endpoint is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18272471     DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hym161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   3.019


  30 in total

Review 1.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katsuyoshi Hashine; Hiroyuki Iio; Yoshiteru Ueno; Shohei Tsukimori; Iku Ninomiya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: diversity of practice across Europe.

Authors:  A Azmi; R A Dillon; S Borghesi; M Dunne; R E Power; L Marignol; B D P O'Neill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 4.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Role of active surveillance and focal therapy in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancers.

Authors:  Henk van der Poel; Laurence Klotz; Gerald Andriole; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Anders Bjartell; Olivier Cussenot; Freddy Hamdy; Markus Graefen; Paolo Palma; Arturo Rodriguez Rivera; Christian G Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Impact of a robotic surgical system on treatment choice for men with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Kobayashi; Kent Kanao; Motoo Araki; Naoki Terada; Yasuyuki Kobayashi; Atsuro Sawada; Takahiro Inoue; Shin Ebara; Toyohiko Watanabe; Tomomi Kamba; Makoto Sumitomo; Yasutomo Nasu; Osamu Ogawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The preoperative pad test as a predictor of urinary incontinence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective, observational, clinical study.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Kurimura; Nobuhiro Haga; Tomohiko Yanagida; Ryo Tanji; Akifumi Onagi; Ruriko Honda; Kanako Matsuoka; Seiji Hoshi; Junya Hata; Mitsutaka Onoda; Yuichi Sato; Hidenori Akaihata; Masao Kataoka; Soichiro Ogawa; Kei Ishibashi; Akio Matsubara; Yoshiyuki Kojima
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Role of active surveillance in the management of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Allison S Glass; Matthew R Cooperberg; Maxwell V Meng; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

Review 9.  Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: overview and update.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.