| Literature DB >> 18271946 |
Rebecca Schramm1, Alicia Abadie, Na Hua, Zhimin Xu, Marybeth Lima.
Abstract
Value-added processing with respect to rice milling has traditionally treated the rice bran layer as a homogenous material that contains significant concentrations of high-value components of interest for pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications. Investigators have shown that high-value components in the rice bran layer vary from differences in kernel-thickness, bran fraction, rice variety, and environmental conditions during the growing season. The objectives of this study were to quantify the amount of rice bran removed at pre-selected milling times and to correlate the amount of rice bran removed at each milling time with the concentration of vitamin E, gamma-oryzanol, rice bran saccharide, and protein obtained. The ultimate goal of this research is to show that rice bran fractionation is a useful method to obtain targeted, nutrient-rich bran samples for value-added processing. Two long grain rice cultivars, Cheniere and Cypress, were milled at discrete times between 3 and 40 seconds using a McGill mill to obtain bran samples for analysis. Results showed that the highest oryzanol and protein concentrations were found in the outer portion of the rice bran layer, while the highest rice bran saccharide concentration was found in the inner portion of the bran layer. Vitamin E concentration showed no significant difference across the bran layer within a variety, though the highest magnitude of concentration occurs within the first 10 seconds of milling for both varieties. To extract the higher concentration of oryzanol and protein only the outer portion of the bran layer requires processing, while to extract the higher concentration of rice bran saccharide, only the inner portion of the bran layer requires processing. Rice bran fractionation allows for the selective use of portions of the bran layer and is advantageous for two reasons: (1) bran fractions contain higher concentrations of components of interest with respect to the overall bran layer average, and (2) less bran needs to be processed to obtain components of interest.Entities:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18271946 PMCID: PMC2265295 DOI: 10.1186/1754-1611-1-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Eng ISSN: 1754-1611 Impact factor: 4.355
Vitamin E and oryzanol concentration and bran fraction as a function of time for Cypress and Cheniere rice varieties (Mean values ± one standard deviation reported)
| 5 | 202.13 ± 11.71 | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 2516.24 ± 255.61 | 217.02 ± 13.86 | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 2671.19 ± 230.98 |
| 10 | 218.21 ± 18.62 | 0.08 ± 0.008 | 2338.71 ± 94.21a | 229.93 ± 8.39 | 0.07 ± 0.001 | 2699.05 ± 90.42a |
| 15 | 195.02 ± 48.58 a | 0.11 ± 0.000 | 2480.83 ± 264.78 | 214.75 ± 20.00 a | 0.10 ± 0.003 | 2564.12 ± 273.88 |
| 20 | 217.86 ± 16.94 a | 0.12 ± 0.002 | 2374.48 ± 39.74 | 213.19 ± 17.63 a | 0.11 ± 0.004 | 2418.41 ± 45.98b10 |
| 25 | 175.73 ± 22.62 a | 0.12 ± 0.000 | 1946.37 ± 180.14b5,10,15,20 | 204.20 ± 21.81 a | 0.11 ± 0.004 | 2136.72 ± 20.40b5,10,15,20 |
| 30 | 187.58 ± 19.64 | 0.12 ± 0.008 | 2161.72 ± 451.80 | 208.29 ± 18.29 | 0.12 ± 0.004 | 2114.77 ± 150.10c |
| 35 | 172.26 ± 31.46 a | 0.14 ± 0.003 | 2009.12 ± 341.61 | 212.78 ± 22.58 a | 0.12 ± 0.005 | 2010.36 ± 283.10b5,10 |
| 40 | 188.76 ± 30.01 | 0.13 ± 0.009 | 2102.17 ± 43.47b5,10,20 | 210.66 ± 20.43 | 0.13 ± 0.004 | 2110.25 ± 218.93b5,10 |
| 45 | 170.26 ± 45.63 a | 0.14 ± 0.001 | 1846.98 ± 248.32b5,10,20,25 | 209.12 ± 25.47 a | 0.13 ± 0.004 | 2022.55 ± 186.08b5,10,15,20 |
a-statistically different between varieties at same operational time setting
b-statistically different within a variety between operational time settings listed
c-one less data point
Figure 1Vitamin E concentration, oryzanol concentration, and percent bran fraction as a function of milling time (p < 0.05).
Protein and RBS Data for Cypress and Cheniere Rice Varieties (Mean values ± one standard deviation reported)
| 3 | 15.15 ± 0.470 a | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.551 ± 0.133 a | 13.81 ± 0.382 | 0.02 ± 0.000 | 0.300 ± 0.081 a |
| 5 | 14.89 ± 0.168 a, b3 | 0.04 ± 0.008 | 0.532 ± 0.197 | 13.47 ± 0.246 | 0.04 ± 0.006 | 0.510 ± 0.223 |
| 10 | 14.56 ± 0.159 a,b3 | 0.07 ± 0.013 | 0.532 ± 0.121 | 12.93 ± 0.128 b3,5 | 0.08 ± 0.002 | 0.459 ± 0.240 |
| 20 | 13.99 ± 0.256 a,b3,5,10 | 0.11 ± 0.001 | 0.902 ± 0.352 b3,5 | 12.49 ± 0.178 b3,5,10 | 0.12 ± 0.001 | 0.615 ± 0.098 |
| 40 | 13.32 ± 0.094 a,b3,5,10,20 | 0.13 ± 0.016 | 1.148 ± 0.208 b5 | 11.97 ± 0.339 b3,5,10 | 0.15 ± 0.001 | 0.988 ± 0.200 b10,20 |
a-statistically different between varieties at same operational time setting
b-statistically different within a variety between operational time settings listed
Figure 2Mean protein, RBS concentration and percent bran fraction as a function of milling time (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Percent difference in component concentration with respect to the overall component average as a function of milling time.