Literature DB >> 18271604

Proteome-wide identification of proteins and their modifications with decreased ambiguities and improved false discovery rates using unique sequence tags.

Yufeng Shen1, Nikola Tolić, Kim K Hixson, Samuel O Purvine, Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić, Wei-Jun Qian, Joshua N Adkins, Ronald J Moore, Richard D Smith.   

Abstract

Identifying proteins and their modification states and with known levels of confidence remains as a significant challenge for proteomics. Random or decoy peptide databases are increasingly being used to estimate the false discovery rate (FDR), e.g., from liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analyses of tryptic digests. We show that this approach can significantly underestimate the FDR and describe an approach for more confident protein identifications that uses unique partial sequences derived from a combination of database searching and amino acid residue sequencing using high-accuracy MS/MS data. Applied to a Saccharomyces cerevisiae tryptic digest, the approach provided 3 132 confident peptide identifications ( approximately 5% modified in some fashion), covering 575 proteins with an estimated zero FDR. The conventional approach provided 3 359 peptide identifications and 656 proteins with 0.3% FDR based upon a decoy database analysis. However, the present approach revealed approximately 5% of the 3 359 identifications to be incorrect and many more as potentially ambiguous (e.g., due to not considering certain amino acid substitutions and modifications). In addition, 677 peptides and 39 proteins were identified that had been missed by conventional analysis, including nontryptic peptides, peptides with a variety of expected/unexpected chemical modifications, known/unknown post-translational modifications, single nucleotide polymorphisms or gene encoding errors, and multiple modifications of individual peptides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18271604      PMCID: PMC2600587          DOI: 10.1021/ac702328x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  36 in total

1.  GutenTag: high-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Anita Saraf; John R Yates
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast.

Authors:  Won-Ki Huh; James V Falvo; Luke C Gerke; Adam S Carroll; Russell W Howson; Jonathan S Weissman; Erin K O'Shea
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Top-down proteomics.

Authors:  Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  A Heuristic method for assigning a false-discovery rate for protein identifications from Mascot database search results.

Authors:  D Brent Weatherly; James A Atwood; Todd A Minning; Cameron Cavola; Rick L Tarleton; Ron Orlando
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Peptide sequence tags for fast database search in mass-spectrometry.

Authors:  Ari Frank; Stephen Tanner; Vineet Bafna; Pavel Pevzner
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.466

6.  Virtual polymorphism: finding divergent peptide matches in mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Rebekah Starkweather; Charles S Barnes; Gerald J Wyckoff; J Andrew Keightley
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags.

Authors:  M Mann; M Wilm
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Overalkylation of a protein digest with iodoacetamide.

Authors:  E S Boja; H M Fales
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 9.  Autophagy in yeast: a review of the molecular machinery.

Authors:  Wei-Pang Huang; Daniel J Klionsky
Journal:  Cell Struct Funct       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.212

10.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Nevan J Krogan; Gerard Cagney; Haiyuan Yu; Gouqing Zhong; Xinghua Guo; Alexandr Ignatchenko; Joyce Li; Shuye Pu; Nira Datta; Aaron P Tikuisis; Thanuja Punna; José M Peregrín-Alvarez; Michael Shales; Xin Zhang; Michael Davey; Mark D Robinson; Alberto Paccanaro; James E Bray; Anthony Sheung; Bryan Beattie; Dawn P Richards; Veronica Canadien; Atanas Lalev; Frank Mena; Peter Wong; Andrei Starostine; Myra M Canete; James Vlasblom; Samuel Wu; Chris Orsi; Sean R Collins; Shamanta Chandran; Robin Haw; Jennifer J Rilstone; Kiran Gandi; Natalie J Thompson; Gabe Musso; Peter St Onge; Shaun Ghanny; Mandy H Y Lam; Gareth Butland; Amin M Altaf-Ul; Shigehiko Kanaya; Ali Shilatifard; Erin O'Shea; Jonathan S Weissman; C James Ingles; Timothy R Hughes; John Parkinson; Mark Gerstein; Shoshana J Wodak; Andrew Emili; Jack F Greenblatt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  21 in total

1.  Pressurized pepsin digestion in proteomics: an automatable alternative to trypsin for integrated top-down bottom-up proteomics.

Authors:  Daniel López-Ferrer; Konstantinos Petritis; Errol W Robinson; Kim K Hixson; Zhixin Tian; Jung Hwa Lee; Sang-Won Lee; Nikola Tolić; Karl K Weitz; Mikhail E Belov; Richard D Smith; Ljiljana Pasa-Tolić
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  The pros and cons of peptide-centric proteomics.

Authors:  Mark W Duncan; Ruedi Aebersold; Richard M Caprioli
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  A method to enhance a1 ions and application for peptide sequencing and protein identification.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Wan Chan; Kim-Chung Lee; Zongwei Cai
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Effectiveness of CID, HCD, and ETD with FT MS/MS for degradomic-peptidomic analysis: comparison of peptide identification methods.

Authors:  Yufeng Shen; Nikola Tolić; Fang Xie; Rui Zhao; Samuel O Purvine; Athena A Schepmoes; Ronald J Moore; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Analyzing protease specificity and detecting in vivo proteolytic events using tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Nitin Gupta; Kim K Hixson; David E Culley; Richard D Smith; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Improving collision induced dissociation (CID), high energy collision dissociation (HCD), and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) fourier transform MS/MS degradome-peptidome identifications using high accuracy mass information.

Authors:  Yufeng Shen; Nikola Tolić; Samuel O Purvine; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Characterization of strategies for obtaining confident identifications in bottom-up proteomics measurements using hybrid FTMS instruments.

Authors:  Aleksey V Tolmachev; Matthew E Monroe; Samuel O Purvine; Ronald J Moore; Navdeep Jaitly; Joshua N Adkins; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  A high-throughput de novo sequencing approach for shotgun proteomics using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Chongle Pan; Byung H Park; William H McDonald; Patricia A Carey; Jillian F Banfield; Nathan C VerBerkmoes; Robert L Hettich; Nagiza F Samatova
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  An empirical strategy for characterizing bacterial proteomes across species in the absence of genomic sequences.

Authors:  Joshua E Turse; Matthew J Marshall; James K Fredrickson; Mary S Lipton; Stephen J Callister
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  De novo sequencing of unique sequence tags for discovery of post-translational modifications of proteins.

Authors:  Yufeng Shen; Nikola Tolić; Kim K Hixson; Samuel O Purvine; Gordon A Anderson; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.