Literature DB >> 14571410

Advances in imaging in the postoperative patient with a rising prostate-specific antigen level.

Hedvig Hricak1, Heiko Schöder, Darko Pucar, Eric Lis, Steven C Eberhardt, Chinyere N Onyebuchi, Howard I Scher.   

Abstract

Imaging prostate cancer continues to represent a clinical challenge for both primary and recurrent disease. In the evaluation of the persistent/recurrent/metastatic prostate cancer, knowledge of cancer location (local v distant), size, and extent are essential in order to design a treatment, tailored to each patient's needs. There are evidence-based guidelines for the use of imaging in assessing the presence of distant spread of prostate cancer. Radionuclide bone scans and computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or positron emission tomography (PET) supplement clinical and biochemical evaluations (prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) for suspected metastatic disease to bones and lymph nodes. There is no consensus about the use of imaging in the evaluation of local tumor recurrence. The use of ultrasound has been limited to biopsy guidance of the prostatic bed, or percutaneous biopsy of enlarged lymph nodes detected on CT or MRI. The use of MRI is evolving. Recent studies indicate that the use of MRI provides valuable information in the evaluation of local tumor recurrence, and nodal and bony metastases. In a patient post-radiation therapy, the method of combining MRI anatomic information with MR spectroscopic metabolic information is evolving. Another modality offering information about anatomy and metabolism of the local disease is PET/CT. The value of PET/CT at present is controversial, but new studies exploring the role of PET/CT in aggressive prostate cancer are promising.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14571410     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-7754(03)00359-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  21 in total

1.  Is 11C-choline the most appropriate tracer for prostate cancer? For.

Authors:  Ferruccio Fazio; Maria Picchio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Is 11C-choline the most appropriate tracer for prostate cancer? Against.

Authors:  Klaus Zöphel; Jörg Kotzerke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 3.  [PSA recurrence after primary curative therapy--local or systemic? When is a second curative therapy still possible?].

Authors:  M P Wirth; F M Engelhardt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  The normal post-surgical anatomy of the male pelvis following radical prostatectomy as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Steven D Allen; Alan Thompson; S Aslam Sohaib
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Novel Imaging in Detection of Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Clayton P Smith; Anna Laucis; Stephanie Harmon; Esther Mena; Liza Lindenberg; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Contemporary management of high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark Garzotto; Arthur Y Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radiohalogenated PET and Therapeutic Agents for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier; Markus Dietlein; Michael A Gorin; Michael R Zalutsky; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  [11C]choline PET/CT imaging in occult local relapse of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sven N Reske; Norbert M Blumstein; Gerhard Glatting
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  A standardised study to compare prostate cancer targeting efficacy of five radiolabelled bombesin analogues.

Authors:  Rogier P J Schroeder; Cristina Müller; Suzanne Reneman; Marleen L Melis; Wout A P Breeman; Erik de Blois; Chris H Bangma; Eric P Krenning; Wytske M van Weerden; Marion de Jong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Matthew D Greer; Sam Borofsky; Ismail M Kabakus; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.