Literature DB >> 18270182

Prospective randomized study comparing luteal phase support for ICSI patients up to the first ultrasound compared with an additional three weeks.

Mohamed A Aboulghar1, Yahia M Amin, Hesham G Al-Inany, Mona M Aboulghar, Latouna M Mourad, Gamal I Serour, Ragaa T Mansour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a consensus that administration of progesterone to women after IVF for luteal phase support (LPS) is associated with a higher ongoing pregnancy rate. However there are few studies, including only one randomized study, which have examined the optimal duration of LPS.
METHODS: A questionnaire concerning details of LPS was returned from 21 leading IVF centres. We then randomized 257 women, who were pregnant after ICSI on day of first ultrasound, into two groups: to continue LPS for three more weeks or to stop on the day of ultrasound.
RESULTS: The duration of LPS in the questionnaire varied from the day of positive pregnancy test up to 12 weeks of pregnancy in different centres. In the randomized study, 132 patients in Group A continued LPS for 3 weeks after first ultrasound, whereas 125 patients in Group B stopped LPS on day of first ultrasound. After confirming pulsations, the miscarriage rate up to 20 weeks of gestation was 4.6% (6/132) in group A and 4.8% (6/125) in group B [odds ratios (OR) = 0.94; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 0.3-3.1]. Bleeding episodes were 15.9% in Group A compared with 20.8% in group B (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.38-1.36).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no international consensus about the duration of LPS; our single-centre randomized trial did not support extending the LPS beyond the day of first ultrasound demonstrating echoes and pulsations. Trials registry number-ISRCTN: 88722916.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18270182     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

Review 1.  Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles.

Authors:  Michelle van der Linden; Karen Buckingham; Cindy Farquhar; Jan A M Kremer; Mostafa Metwally
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 2.  The optimal duration of progesterone supplementation in pregnant women after IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi-Ru Liu; Hua-Qiao Mu; Qi Shi; Xiao-Qiu Xiao; Hong-Bo Qi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.211

3.  Vaginal micronized progesterone capsule versus vaginal progesterone gel for lutheal support in normoresponder IVF/ICSI-ET cycles.

Authors:  Kenan Sofuoglu; Ismet Gun; Sadik Sahin; Okan Ozden; Oktay Tosun; Mustafa Eroglu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  Early stop of progesterone supplementation after confirmation of pregnancy in IVF/ICSI fresh embryo transfer cycles of poor responders does not affect pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  Song-Po Pan; Kuang-Han Chao; Chu-Chun Huang; Ming-Yih Wu; Mei-Jou Chen; Chin-Hao Chang; Jehn-Hsiahn Yang; Yu-Shih Yang; Shee-Uan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A 10-year follow-up on the practice of luteal phase support using worldwide web-based surveys.

Authors:  Gon Shoham; Milton Leong; Ariel Weissman
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Subcutaneous progesterone versus vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Banafsheh Mohammadi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2021-02-21

7.  A randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of aqueous subcutaneous progesterone with vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Christopher A Jones; Kevin Doody; Russell Foulk; Bill Yee; G David Adamson; Barbara Cometti; Gary DeVane; Gary Hubert; Silvia Trevisan; Fred Hoehler; Clarence Jones; Michael Soules
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Luteal Phase Support in IVF: Comparison Between Evidence-Based Medicine and Real-Life Practices.

Authors:  Federica Di Guardo; Habib Midassi; Annalisa Racca; Herman Tournaye; Michel De Vos; Christophe Blockeel
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  The effect of early administration of rectal progesterone in IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies on the preterm birth rate: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Mona Mohamed Aboulghar; Yahia El-Faissal; Ahmed Kamel; Ragaa Mansour; Gamal Serour; Mohamed Aboulghar; Yomna Islam
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 10.  Individualized luteal phase support after fresh embryo transfer: unanswered questions, a review.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Jie Hao; Yanping Li
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 3.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.