Literature DB >> 18269651

Positron emission tomography and pathological evidence of response to neoadjuvant therapy in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

B M Smithers1, G C Couper, J M Thomas, D Wong, D C Gotley, I Martin, J A Harvey, D B Thomson, E T Walpole, N Watts, B H Burmeister.   

Abstract

Our aim was to determine if fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) could be correlated with a pathological response in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation therapy. Patients with resectable, histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the esophagus were entered in the study. Preoperative chemotherapy comprised two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Radiation therapy commenced with the second cycle on day 22. FDG-PET images were obtained pre-treatment and on completion of intended neo-adjuvant treatment. Quantification was achieved by the calculation of both standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor/liver ratios (TLR). Evidence of histopathological response was identified according to the Mandard tumor regression scoring system. There were 45 patients, 22 receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 23 chemoradiation therapy. Forty patients underwent surgical resection. Seven patients (16%) had a histopathological response. The mean percentage change in SUV in the histological responders group was -56.8% (SD 29) and in the non-responders -27.8% (SD 32.1) (P = 0.035). The mean percentage change in TLR was -49.1% (SD 44.8) in the responders and in the non-responders -27.3% (SD 31.3) (P = 0.128). There was no difference between the two methods of assessment, however there was less variation with SUV. There was no correlation between the FDG-PET response and the histopathological response. Presently an FDG-PET scan performed 3-6 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus should not be used as a marker of the potential result of the treatment. The optimal timing of a second FDG-PET remains unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18269651     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00732.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  21 in total

1.  Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Michael Christensen; Jonathan D Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Kevin Crawford; Oleh Haluszka; Jeffrey Tokar; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Alan Maurer; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tracy Klayton; Tianyu Li; Jian Q Yu; Lanea Keller; Jonathan Cheng; Steven J Cohen; Neal J Meropol; Walter Scott; Meng Xu-Welliver; Andre Konski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

3.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Evaluation of response: is 18F-FDG PET the answer?

Authors:  Arturo Chiti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Prediction of tumour response by FDG-PET in patients with adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Hinrich Wieder; Wolfgang Weber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Prediction of tumour response by FDG-PET in patients with adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient modifications in assessing gastro-oesophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment: comparison with tumour regression grade at histology.

Authors:  Francesco De Cobelli; Francesco Giganti; Elena Orsenigo; Michaela Cellina; Antonio Esposito; Giulia Agostini; Luca Albarello; Elena Mazza; Alessandro Ambrosi; Carlo Socci; Carlo Staudacher; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Detecting treatment response in a model of human breast adenocarcinoma using hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate and [1,4-13C2]fumarate.

Authors:  T H Witney; M I Kettunen; D-e Hu; F A Gallagher; S E Bohndiek; R Napolitano; K M Brindle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Clinical role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in post-operative follow up of gastric cancer: initial results.

Authors:  Long Sun; Xin-Hui Su; Yong-Song Guan; Wei-Ming Pan; Zuo-Ming Luo; Ji-Hong Wei; Hua Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Elena Elimova; Xuemei Wang; Elba Etchebehere; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Roopma Wadhwa; Venkatram Planjery; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Mariela A Blum; Wayne Hofstetter; Jeff H Lee; Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Jane E Rogers; Dipen Maru; Heath D Skinner; Homer A Macapinlac; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.