Literature DB >> 12149307

American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition.

Rowan T Chlebowski1, Nananda Col, Eric P Winer, Deborah E Collyar, Steven R Cummings, Victor G Vogel, Harold J Burstein, Andrea Eisen, Isaac Lipkus, David G Pfister.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To update an evidence-based technology assessment of chemoprevention strategies for breast cancer risk reduction. POTENTIAL
INTERVENTIONS: Tamoxifen, raloxifene, aromatase inhibition, and fenretinide. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefit. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for relevant topics. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed. VALUES: More weight was given to published randomized trials. BENEFITS/HARMS: A woman's decision regarding breast cancer risk reduction strategies is complex and will depend on the importance and weight attributed to information regarding both cancer- and noncancer-related risks and benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: For women with a defined 5-year projected breast cancer risk of > or= 1.66%, tamoxifen (at 20 mg/d for 5 years) may be offered to reduce their risk. Risk/benefit models suggest that greatest clinical benefit with least side effects is derived from use of tamoxifen in younger (premenopausal) women (who are less likely to have thromboembolic sequelae and uterine cancer), women without a uterus, and women at higher breast cancer risk. Data do not as yet suggest that tamoxifen provides an overall health benefit or increases survival. In all circumstances, tamoxifen use should be discussed as part of an informed decision-making process with careful consideration of individually calculated risks and benefits. Use of tamoxifen combined with hormone replacement therapy or use of raloxifene, any aromatase inhibitor or inactivator, or fenretinide to lower the risk of developing breast cancer is not recommended outside of a clinical trial setting. This technology assessment represents an ongoing process and recommendations will be updated in a timely matter. VALIDATION: The conclusions were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12149307     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

1.  A randomized, controlled trial to increase discussion of breast cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Celia P Kaplan; Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske; Steven E Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Rena J Pasick; Alice Chen; Jessica Quinn; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Breast cancer chemoprevention: progress and controversy.

Authors:  D Lawrence Wickerham
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.495

3.  Impact of a primary care based intervention on breast cancer knowledge, risk perception and concern: A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah S Karliner; Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske; Steven Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Rena J Pasick; Alice Chen; Jessica Quinn; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  Risk-reducing medications for primary breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Annabel Goodwin; Sandro Pasquali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-29

Review 5.  Treatment of osteoporosis and reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with raloxifene.

Authors:  Seung Sang Ko; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.889

6.  Meta-analysis of vascular and neoplastic events associated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  R Scott Braithwaite; Rowan T Chlebowski; Joseph Lau; Suzanne George; Rachel Hess; Nananda F Col
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Hip bone density predicts breast cancer risk independently of Gail score: results from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Leslie Arendell; Mikel Aickin; Jane Cauley; Cora E Lewis; Rowan Chlebowski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  Prevention of breast cancer in postmenopausal women: approaches to estimating and reducing risk.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; Jeffrey A Tice; Scott Bauer; Warren S Browner; Jack Cuzick; Elad Ziv; Victor Vogel; John Shepherd; Celine Vachon; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  Should tamoxifen be used in breast cancer prevention?

Authors:  Rita Kramer; Powel Brown
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on the use of pharmacologic interventions including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition for breast cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Kala Visvanathan; Rowan T Chlebowski; Patricia Hurley; Nananda F Col; Mary Ropka; Deborah Collyar; Monica Morrow; Carolyn Runowicz; Kathleen I Pritchard; Karen Hagerty; Banu Arun; Judy Garber; Victor G Vogel; James L Wade; Powel Brown; Jack Cuzick; Barnett S Kramer; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.