Literature DB >> 18266737

Methodology for comparing source and plume remediation alternatives.

Ronald W Falta1.   

Abstract

It is often difficult at contaminated sites to decide whether remediation effort should be focused on the contaminant source, the dissolved plume, or on both zones. The decision process at these sites is hampered by a lack of quantitative tools for comparing remediation alternatives. A new screening-level mass balance approach is developed for simulating the transient effects of simultaneous ground water source and plume remediation. The contaminant source model is based on a power function relationship between source mass and source discharge, and it can consider partial source remediation at any time after the initial release. The source model serves as a time-dependent mass flux boundary condition to a new analytical plume model, where flow is assumed to be one dimensional, with three-dimensional dispersion. The plume model simulates first-order sequential decay and production of several species, and the decay rates and parent/daughter yield coefficients are variable functions of time and distance. This new method allows for flexible simulation of natural attenuation or remediation efforts that enhance plume degradation. The plume remediation effort may be temporary or delayed in time, limited in space, and it may have different chemical effects on different contaminant species in the decay chain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18266737     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00416.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ground Water        ISSN: 0017-467X            Impact factor:   2.671


  3 in total

1.  Source strength functions from long-term monitoring data and spatially distributed mass discharge measurements.

Authors:  Michael C Brooks; A Lynn Wood; Jaehyun Cho; Christine A P Williams; William Brandon; Michael D Annable
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 2.  Microbial degradation of chloroethenes: a review.

Authors:  Iva Dolinová; Martina Štrojsová; Miroslav Černík; Jan Němeček; Jiřina Macháčková; Alena Ševců
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Arsenic release from pyrite ash waste over an active hydrogeological system and its effects on water quality.

Authors:  Diego Baragaño; Carlos Boente; Eduardo Rodríguez-Valdés; Alicia Fernández-Braña; Amalia Jiménez; José Luis R Gallego; Beatriz González-Fernández
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.