Literature DB >> 18265993

Laparoscopic assisted dismembered pyeloplasty in children: intermediate results.

Sudhir Sukumar1, Balagopal Nair, K V Sanjeevan, Georgie Mathew, H Sanjay Bhat.   

Abstract

To study the results of an innovative minimally invasive technique of performing dismembered pyeloplasty in children. Using 5 mm camera and 3 mm working ports, the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) is mobilized by a transperitoneal laparoscopic technique. The UPJ is brought out through a tiny flank incision and a standard dismembered pyeloplasty is performed over a double J stent. Between October 2003 and January 2005, 13 children underwent laparoscopic assisted dismembered pyeloplasty. Indications, operative duration, hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative isotope renogram parameters were analyzed. The children were in the age range of 3 months to 6 years-three were right sided and ten were left sided. Only three were symptomatic while the remaining ten were detected to have UPJ obstruction during evaluation for antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Mean operative duration was 104.2 min (range 80-150 min) with no significant difference in the two patients with crossing vessels. Incision was smaller than 2 cms in all and the average postoperative hospital stay was 3.2 days (range 2-5 days). Follow-up ranging from 28 to 44 months showed reduction in hydronephrosis and improvement in renal function of all the operated units. Isotope renogram in only one patient showed equivocal slopes and prolonged half clearance times though no further surgical intervention was required. This technique has results comparable to that of open pyeloplasty and hence, maybe considered a good option for surgeons making the transition to laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18265993     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-008-2109-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  13 in total

1.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Arnaud Bonnard; Virginie Fouquet; Elisabeth Carricaburu; Yves Aigrain; Alaa El-Ghoneimi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  H L Tan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Pelviureteric obstruction in children: conventional pyeloplasty is superior to endo-urology.

Authors:  S Ahmed; S Crankson; V Sripathi
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1998-09

4.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children.

Authors:  Mallikarjun Reddy; R B Nerli; Rajeev Bashetty; I R Ravish
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Retroperitoneal-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: initial experience.

Authors:  Walid Farhat; Kourosh Afshar; Frank Papanikolaou; Rebecca Austin; Antoine Khoury; Darius Bagli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Laparoscopic mobilization and exteriorization for minimally invasive small bowel resection.

Authors:  A Nassar
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery.

Authors:  Richard S Lee; Alan B Retik; Joseph G Borer; Craig A Peters
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years.

Authors:  S Cascio; A Tien; W Chee; H L Tan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.

Authors:  C A Peters; R N Schlussel; A B Retik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children.

Authors:  A El-Ghoneimi; W Farhat; S Bolduc; D Bagli; G McLorie; Y Aigrain; A Khoury
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  2 in total

1.  Study comparing the applicability of dorsal lumbotomy in older children.

Authors:  Jonathan Cloutier; Nadim Haidar; Marie-Pier Rompre-Deschenes; Maryse Grimard; Stéphane Bolduc
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Pyeloplasty techniques using minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Francesco Turrà; Maria Escolino; Alessandra Farina; Alessandro Settimi; Ciro Esposito; François Varlet
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2016-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.