Literature DB >> 18265618

Formal notations are diagrams: evidence from a production task.

David Landy1, Robert L Goldtone.   

Abstract

Although a general sense of the magnitude, quantity, or numerosity of objects is common in both untrained people and animals, the abilities to deal exactly with large quantities and to reason precisely in complex but well-specified situations--to behave formally, that is--are skills unique to people trained in symbolic notations. These symbolic notations typically employ complex, hierarchically embedded structures, which all extant analyses assume are constructed by concatenative, rule-based processes. The primary goal of this article is to establish, using behavioral measures on naturalistic tasks, that some of the same cognitive resources involved in representing spatial relations and proximities are also involved in representing symbolic notations--in short, that formal notations are a kind of diagram. We examined self-generated productions in the domains of handwritten arithmetic expressions and typewritten statements in a formal logic. In both tasks, we found substantial evidence for spatial representational schemes even in these highly symbolic domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18265618     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  7 in total

1.  Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors.

Authors:  L Boroditsky
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-04-14

2.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases.

Authors:  M H Fischer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  The surface form x problem size interaction in cognitive arithmetic: evidence against an encoding locus.

Authors:  J I Campbell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-03-01

4.  Why won't you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations.

Authors:  Nicole M McNeil; Martha W Alibali
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

5.  How abstract is symbolic thought?

Authors:  David Landy; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Human symbol manipulation within an integrated cognitive architecture.

Authors:  John R Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-05-06

7.  Gesture-speech mismatch and mechanisms of learning: what the hands reveal about a child's state of mind.

Authors:  M W Alibali; S Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.468

  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger; Ryan W Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-07-02

2.  The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis.

Authors:  Edouard Machery
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

3.  How to reason without words: inference as categorization.

Authors:  Ronaldo Vigo; Colin Allen
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-07-15

4.  Persistent perceptual grouping effects in the evaluation of simple arithmetic expressions.

Authors:  Jessie Rivera; Patrick Garrigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

5.  A perceptual account of symbolic reasoning.

Authors:  David Landy; Colin Allen; Carlos Zednik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-21

6.  Spacing and Presentation Modes Affect the Unit-Decade Compatibility Effect During Number Comparison.

Authors:  Belinda Pletzer; Andrea Scheuringer; TiAnni Harris
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2016-06

7.  Mastering algebra retrains the visual system to perceive hierarchical structure in equations.

Authors:  Tyler Marghetis; David Landy; Robert L Goldstone
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-07

8.  Representing Variability: The Case of Life Cycle Diagrams.

Authors:  David Menendez; Olympia N Mathiaparanam; David Liu; Vienne Seitz; Martha W Alibali; Karl S Rosengren
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.