Literature DB >> 18264835

How do hospitalized patients feel about resident work hours, fatigue, and discontinuity of care?

Kathlyn E Fletcher1, Francine C Wiest, Lakshmi Halasyamani, Jeffrey Lin, Victoria Nelson, Samuel R Kaufman, Sanjay Saint, Marilyn Schapira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered care requires that physicians understand patients' perspectives. Since the resident work hour rules were instituted, little information is available about how patients perceive these issues. Our objectives were to explore patients' knowledge, concerns, and attitudes about resident work hours, fatigue, and continuity of inpatient care and to evaluate the association between patients' trust and satisfaction with these concerns and attitudes.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 134 internal medicine inpatients at 3 institutions including a tertiary care academic health center, a Veterans Affairs medical center, and a private community teaching hospital.
RESULTS: Mean age was 59 (range, 24-90), with 60% men and 70% white. Most patients agreed (50%) or felt neutral (38%) toward resident work hours being limited. Patients estimated that residents worked 60 h per week but thought that they should work no more than 51 h per week (p < .01 for the difference). Twenty-seven percent of patients had some concern about fatigue in the residents, and 28% reported concern about how often hand-offs of care occurred. Factor analysis yielded 3 factors: "worried about discontinuity/fatigue," "attitude toward resident/nurse work hours," and "perceived resident/nurse fatigue." In multivariable analyses, the "worried about fatigue/discontinuity" factor significantly predicted trust and satisfaction, and the "perceived resident/nurse fatigue" factor also predicted satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: Some inpatients are concerned about both fatigue in resident physicians and discontinuity of care. This may play a role in trust and satisfaction for patients. Taking steps to design systems to minimize fatigue and discontinuity would be ideal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264835      PMCID: PMC2324147          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0384-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  9 in total

1.  Does continuity of care matter? Yes: consistent contact with a physician improves outcomes.

Authors:  D A Christakis
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-07

2.  New requirements for resident duty hours.

Authors:  Ingrid Philibert; Paul Friedmann; William T Williams
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians.

Authors:  D H Thom; K M Ribisl; A L Stewart; D A Luke
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships.

Authors:  L A Anderson; R F Dedrick
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1990-12

5.  Patients' experiences with hospital care in five countries.

Authors:  A Coulter; P D Cleary
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust in regular doctors and patient satisfaction with consultations with family doctors.

Authors:  Richard Baker; Arch G Mainous; Denis Pereira Gray; Margaret M Love
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 7.  Measuring patients' trust in physicians when assessing quality of care.

Authors:  David H Thom; Mark A Hall; L Gregory Pawlson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style.

Authors:  C Lerman; M D Schwartz; S M Miller; M Daly; C Sands; B K Rimer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Good physicians from the perspective of their patients.

Authors:  Ami Schattner; Dan Rudin; Navah Jellin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-09-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Medical education on the brink: 62 years of front-line observations and opinions.

Authors:  Herbert L Fred
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

2.  The 80-hour work week for residents: views from obstetric and gynecology program directors.

Authors:  Jabin Janoo; Mahreen Hashmi; Dara J Seybold; Robert Shapiro; Byron C Calhoun; Stephen H Bush
Journal:  W V Med J       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

3.  Patient Perceptions of Whom is Most Involved in Their Care with Successive Duty Hour Limits.

Authors:  Vineet M Arora; Micah T Prochaska; Jeanne M Farnan; David O Meltzer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Toward "The Genius of the AND": Balancing Professionalism and Duty Hour Requirements in Graduate Medical Education.

Authors:  James K Stoller; J Harry Isaacson; Craig Nielsen
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

5.  Hospitalized Patients' Perceptions of Resident Fatigue, Duty Hours, and Continuity of Care.

Authors:  Brian C Drolet; Charles H Hyman; Kimeya F Ghaderi; Joshua Rodriguez-Srednicki; Jordan M Thompson; Staci A Fischer
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-12

6.  Resident duty hours: Families' knowledge and perceptions in the paediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ronish Gupta; Kaylee Eady; Katherine Moreau; Jason R Frank; Hilary K Writer
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.253

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.