INTRODUCTION: The psychomotor stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) has been shown to improve attentional processes, reflected in behavioural measures such as vigilance, reaction time and visual attention tasks. The neural mechanisms of MPH action on sensory information processing, however, remain poorly understood. To the authors' knowledge, this present study is the first to investigate whether a single dose of MPH affects neural substrates of passive attention in healthy adults studied with simultaneous whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). METHODS:Monaural left-ear auditory stimuli were presented in an oddball paradigm with infrequent deviant tones differing in frequency and duration. Neuronal activity was recorded with simultaneous whole-head MEG and EEG in 13 healthy subjects (five females; aged 27 +/- 5 years) after oral administration of 40 mg MPH or placebo in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over design. We analysed both electric and magnetic N100, P200 and mismatch negativity (MMN) components. RESULTS:MPH increased arousal levels in visual analogue scales. MPH had no effect on the dipole strength of MMN or MMNm in either frequency or duration deviations. MPH did, however, reduce P200 amplitudes in EEG. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of effect of MPH on either MMN or MMNm suggests no association between catecholaminergic activities and MMN generation. However, our findings imply that MPH may change the neural bases of auditory information processing such as the early stimulus evaluation reflected in the P200 component. Dopamine and noradrenaline neurotransmitter systems could be responsible for the modulation of these processes. The exclusive effect of MPH on the P200 component could have a clinical application.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The psychomotor stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) has been shown to improve attentional processes, reflected in behavioural measures such as vigilance, reaction time and visual attention tasks. The neural mechanisms of MPH action on sensory information processing, however, remain poorly understood. To the authors' knowledge, this present study is the first to investigate whether a single dose of MPH affects neural substrates of passive attention in healthy adults studied with simultaneous whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). METHODS: Monaural left-ear auditory stimuli were presented in an oddball paradigm with infrequent deviant tones differing in frequency and duration. Neuronal activity was recorded with simultaneous whole-head MEG and EEG in 13 healthy subjects (five females; aged 27 +/- 5 years) after oral administration of 40 mg MPH or placebo in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over design. We analysed both electric and magnetic N100, P200 and mismatch negativity (MMN) components. RESULTS:MPH increased arousal levels in visual analogue scales. MPH had no effect on the dipole strength of MMN or MMNm in either frequency or duration deviations. MPH did, however, reduce P200 amplitudes in EEG. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of effect of MPH on either MMN or MMNm suggests no association between catecholaminergic activities and MMN generation. However, our findings imply that MPH may change the neural bases of auditory information processing such as the early stimulus evaluation reflected in the P200 component. Dopamine and noradrenaline neurotransmitter systems could be responsible for the modulation of these processes. The exclusive effect of MPH on the P200 component could have a clinical application.
Authors: Dahlia Sharon; Matti S Hämäläinen; Roger B H Tootell; Eric Halgren; John W Belliveau Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Nicholas J Cooper; Hannah Keage; Daniel Hermens; Leanne M Williams; David Debrota; C Richard Clark; Evian Gordon Journal: J Integr Neurosci Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 2.117
Authors: Daniel Umbricht; Daniel Javitt; Gerald Novak; John Bates; Simcha Pollack; Jeffrey Lieberman; John Kane Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: André Schmidt; Rosilla Bachmann; Michael Kometer; Philipp A Csomor; Klaas E Stephan; Erich Seifritz; Franz X Vollenweider Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Timothy P L Roberts; Sarah Y Khan; Mike Rey; Justin F Monroe; Katelyn Cannon; Lisa Blaskey; Sarah Woldoff; Saba Qasmieh; Mike Gandal; Gwen L Schmidt; Deborah M Zarnow; Susan E Levy; J Christopher Edgar Journal: Autism Res Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 5.216