Literature DB >> 16601362

Neural effects of nicotine during auditory selective attention in smokers: an event-related potential study.

Verner Knott1, Crystal Blais, Carole Scherling, Jordan Camarda, Anne Millar, Derek Fisher, Judy McIntosh.   

Abstract

Acute nicotine has been found to improve task performance in smokers after smoking abstinence, but the attentional processes mediating these improvements are unclear. Since scalp-recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) have been shown to be sensitive indicators of selective attention, the effects of acutely administered nicotine were examined on ERPs and concomitant behavioural performance measures in an auditory selective attention task. Ten (6 males) overnight smoking-abstinent cigarette smokers received nicotine gum (4 mg) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design. In a dichotic listening task [which required participants to attend and detect (target) deviant stimuli in one ear and to ignore similar stimuli in the other ear] which included ERP recordings and assessment of response speed and accuracy measures, nicotine gum failed to alter behavioural performance or amplitudes of ERP components sensitive to selective attention [reflected in the N100 and negative difference (Nd) component] or to pre-attentive detection of acoustic change [reflected in the mismatch negativity (MMN) component]. However, nicotine did influence the speed of these voluntary selective processes, as reflected by shortened latencies of the early Nd component. The findings are discussed in relation to the stimulus filter theory of smoking, and with respect to nicotine's actions on involuntary and controlled aspects of selective attention processes. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16601362     DOI: 10.1159/000092541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychobiology        ISSN: 0302-282X            Impact factor:   2.328


  4 in total

1.  Effects of acute nicotine on auditory change-related cortical responses.

Authors:  Naofumi Otsuru; Aki Tsuruhara; Eishi Motomura; Hisashi Tanii; Makoto Nishihara; Koji Inui; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Acute dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptor stimulation does not modulate mismatch negativity (MMN) in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Sumie Leung; Rodney J Croft; Torsten Baldeweg; Pradeep J Nathan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The effect of methylphenidate on auditory information processing in healthy volunteers: a combined EEG/MEG study.

Authors:  Milena Korostenskaja; Dubravko Kicić; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  The mismatch negativity: a review of underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Marta I Garrido; James M Kilner; Klaas E Stephan; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 3.708

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.