Literature DB >> 12534550

Hymenoptera ultra-rush venom immunotherapy (210 min): a safety study and risk factors.

J Birnbaum1, M Ramadour, A Magnan, D Vervloet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, which summarizes our last 5 years of experience, we evaluated the side-effects of ultra-rush venom immunotherapy and the possibility to define some risk factors for side-effects as age, Hymenoptera venom used for treatment, treatment phase, severity of prior insect sting reaction, concentration of skin test positivity, and level of specific IgE.
METHODS: In our protocol on day 1, an initial venom dose of 0.1 microg was followed by 1, 10, 20 microg at 30-min intervals and then 30 and 40 microg at 60-min intervals. Patients who completed this protocol received two booster injections of 50 microg on day 15 and one of 100 microg on day 45. Subsequently, monthly 100 microg boosters were given.
RESULTS: Fifty-one children (9.20 +/- 3.41 years) and 207 adults (40.62 +/- 14.00 years) underwent an ultra-rapid venom immunotherapy (ultra-RVIT). Single ultra-RVIT was administered to 195 patients: 69 with honeybee, 123 with yellow jacket and three with wasp venoms. Two venoms were injected into 59 patients: 42 with yellow jacket and wasp, 17 with yellow jacket and honeybee. Four patients received the three venoms. The frequency of immediate systemic reactions (SR) was not significantly different between adults and children: 11.2% vs. 10.8%. SR were experienced more frequently on day 1 (n= 33). They were uncommon on day 15 (n= 2) and on day 45 (n= 1). No late reactions have been observed. Honeybee venom induced significantly more SR (30%) vs. yellow jacket (3.2%) and wasp venom (6.1%). Among the 33 patients who experienced a SR on day 1, 24 had a reaction grade 1 or 2 and nine had a reaction grade 3 or 4. There is a significant risk for patients with a prior reaction grade 3 or 4 to experience a SR during venom immunotherapy (VIT). The strength of positive skin tests and the level of specific IgE were not related to an increased risk of SR (P= NS).
CONCLUSION: Treatment with honeybee extract induced more SR than the treatment with yellow jacket and wasp venom. Doses increase phase on day 1 is risk factors for SR of ultra-RVIT, as well as the severity of the prior reaction. Age, degree of positive skin tests, and specific IgE are not risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12534550     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01564.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  17 in total

Review 1.  Clinical immunology review series: an approach to desensitization.

Authors:  M T Krishna; A P Huissoon
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Fatalities following allergen immunotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea T Borchers; Carl L Keen; M Eric Gershwin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 8.667

3.  Safety of specific immunotherapy using an ultra-rush induction regimen in bee and wasp allergy.

Authors:  Andrzej Bożek; Krzysztof Kołodziejczyk
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Induction of specific immunotherapy with hymenoptera venoms using ultrarush regimen in children: safety and tolerance.

Authors:  Alice Köhli-Wiesner; Lisbeth Stahlberger; Christian Bieli; Tamar Stricker; Roger Lauener
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-07-19

5.  Honeybee venom immunotherapy: a comparative study using purified and nonpurified aqueous extracts in patients with normal Basal serum tryptase concentrations.

Authors:  M Beatrice Bilò; Barbara Cinti; M Feliciana Brianzoni; M Chiara Braschi; Martina Bonifazi; Leonardo Antonicelli
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2012-01-12

6.  Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy: Tolerance and Efficacy of an Ultrarush Protocol versus a Rush and a Slow Conventional Protocol.

Authors:  Vincenzo Patella; Giovanni Florio; Ada Giuliano; Carmine Oricchio; Giuseppe Spadaro; Gianni Marone; Arturo Genovese
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2012-05-24

Review 7.  Facing Hymenoptera Venom Allergy: From Natural to Recombinant Allergens.

Authors:  Amilcar Perez-Riverol; Débora Lais Justo-Jacomini; Ricardo de Lima Zollner; Márcia Regina Brochetto-Braga
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 8.  Risk associated with bee venom therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeong Hwan Park; Bo Kyung Yim; Jun-Hwan Lee; Sanghun Lee; Tae-Hun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Novel birch pollen specific immunotherapy formulation based on contiguous overlapping peptides.

Authors:  Céline Pellaton; Yannick Perrin; Caroline Boudousquié; Nathalie Barbier; Jacqueline Wassenberg; Giampietro Corradin; Anne-Christine Thierry; Régine Audran; Christophe Reymond; François Spertini
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 10.  [Venom immunotherapy. Side effects and efficacy of treatment].

Authors:  F Ruëff; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.