OBJECTIVE: Chromosome correlation maps display correlations between gene expression patterns on the same chromosome. Our goal was to map the genes on chromosome regions and to identify correlations through their location on chromosome regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following microarray analysis we used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to construct gene networks of the co-deregulated genes in bladder cancer. Chromosome mapping, mathematical modeling and data simulations were performed using the WebGestalt and Matlab(®) softwares. RESULTS: The top deregulated molecules among 129 bladder cancer samples were implicated in the PI3K/AKT signaling, cell cycle, Myc-mediated apoptosis signaling and ERK5 signaling pathways. Their most prominent molecular and cellular functions were related to cell cycle, cell death, gene expression, molecular transport and cellular growth and proliferation. Chromosome correlation maps allowed us to detect significantly co-expressed genes along the chromosomes. We identified strong correlations among tumors of Tα-grade 1, as well as for those of Tα-grade 2, in chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 7, 12 and 19. Chromosomal domains of gene co-expression were revealed for the normal tissues, as well. The expression data were further simulated, exhibiting an excellent fit (0.7 < R(2) < 0.9). The simulations revealed that along the different samples, genes on same chromosomes are expressed in a similar manner. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression is highly correlated on the chromosome level. Chromosome correlation maps of gene expression signatures can provide further information on gene regulatory mechanisms. Gene expression data can be simulated using polynomial functions.
OBJECTIVE: Chromosome correlation maps display correlations between gene expression patterns on the same chromosome. Our goal was to map the genes on chromosome regions and to identify correlations through their location on chromosome regions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following microarray analysis we used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) to construct gene networks of the co-deregulated genes in bladder cancer. Chromosome mapping, mathematical modeling and data simulations were performed using the WebGestalt and Matlab(®) softwares. RESULTS: The top deregulated molecules among 129 bladder cancer samples were implicated in the PI3K/AKT signaling, cell cycle, Myc-mediated apoptosis signaling and ERK5 signaling pathways. Their most prominent molecular and cellular functions were related to cell cycle, cell death, gene expression, molecular transport and cellular growth and proliferation. Chromosome correlation maps allowed us to detect significantly co-expressed genes along the chromosomes. We identified strong correlations among tumors of Tα-grade 1, as well as for those of Tα-grade 2, in chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 7, 12 and 19. Chromosomal domains of gene co-expression were revealed for the normal tissues, as well. The expression data were further simulated, exhibiting an excellent fit (0.7 < R(2) < 0.9). The simulations revealed that along the different samples, genes on same chromosomes are expressed in a similar manner. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression is highly correlated on the chromosome level. Chromosome correlation maps of gene expression signatures can provide further information on gene regulatory mechanisms. Gene expression data can be simulated using polynomial functions.
Authors: M Takahashi; D R Rhodes; K A Furge; H Kanayama ; S Kagawa; B B Haab; B T Teh Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-08-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lars Dyrskjøt; Thomas Thykjaer; Mogens Kruhøffer; Jens Ledet Jensen; Niels Marcussen; Stephen Hamilton-Dutoit; Hans Wolf; Torben F Orntoft Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2002-12-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Nicholas D Socci; Elizabeth Charytonowicz; Minglan Lu; Michael Prystowsky; Geoffrey Childs; Carlos Cordon-Cardo Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-12-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: D T Ross; U Scherf; M B Eisen; C M Perou; C Rees; P Spellman; V Iyer; S S Jeffrey; M Van de Rijn; M Waltham; A Pergamenschikov; J C Lee; D Lashkari; D Shalon; T G Myers; J N Weinstein; D Botstein; P O Brown Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: E Rogala; E Skopińska-Rózewska; E Sommer; K Pastewka; J Chorostowska-Wynimko; I Sokolnicka; M Kazoń Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: T Sørlie; C M Perou; R Tibshirani; T Aas; S Geisler; H Johnsen; T Hastie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; T Thorsen; H Quist; J C Matese; P O Brown; D Botstein; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-09-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein Journal: Nature Date: 2000-08-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: T Thykjaer; C Workman; M Kruhøffer; K Demtröder; H Wolf; L D Andersen; C M Frederiksen; S Knudsen; T F Orntoft Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Dionysios V Chartoumpekis; Apostolos Zaravinos; Panos G Ziros; Ralitsa P Iskrenova; Agathoklis I Psyrogiannis; Venetsana E Kyriazopoulou; Ioannis G Habeos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240