Literature DB >> 18262731

Estrogen-dependent prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in early-stage invasive breast cancers treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation.

Bruce G Haffty1, Qifeng Yang, Meena S Moran, Antoinette R Tan, Michael Reiss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic significance of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy (CS+RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1975 and 2003, we retrieved specimens from 504 breast cancer patients treated with CS+RT. The specimens were constructed into tissue microarrays processed and stained for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor, Her2/neu, and COX-2. Each core was scored as positive or negative. All data including demographics, clinical, pathologic, staging, and outcome variables were entered into a computerized database.
RESULTS: Expression of COX-2 was positive in 58% of cases and correlated with younger age (p = 0.01) and larger tumor size (p = 0.001). Expression of COX-2 was predictive of local relapse (relative risk[RR], 3.248; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.340-7.871; p = 0.0091), distant metastasis (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.259-3.896; p = 0.0058), and decreased survival (RR, 2.321; 95% CI, 1.324-4.071; p = 0.0033). Among ER-positive patients, COX-2 expression was predictive of worse local control (85% vs. 93%, p = 0.04), distant metastasis (75% vs. 95%, p = 0.002) and worse survival (65% vs. 94%, p = 0.002). Among ER-negative tumors COX-2 expression was not significantly correlated with local control (87 vs. 95%, p = 0.12), distant metastasis (73% vs. 78%, p = 0.39), or survival (77% vs. 87%, p = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: In breast cancer patients treated with CS+RT, COX-2 expression is associated with younger age, larger tumor size, worse local control, distant metastasis, and worse overall survival. The significance is limited to hormone receptor-positive tumors, consistent with the known effect of COX-2/PGE2 on aromatase activity. Use of COX-2 inhibitors in estrogen-dependent breast cancers warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18262731     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Evaluation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the p53 binding protein 1 (TP53BP1) gene in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation (BCS + RT).

Authors:  Bruce G Haffty; Sharad Goyal; Diptee Kulkarni; Camille Green; Alexi Vazquez; Devora Schiff; Meena S Moran; Qifeng Yang; Shridar Ganesan; Kim M Hirsfield
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Impact of cyclooxygenase-2 over-expression on the prognosis of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sertaç Ata Güler; Mustafa Ümit Uğurlu; Handan Kaya; Semiha Şen; Yasemin Nazlı; Bahadır M Güllüoğlu
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 5.  Inflammation and cancer: how friendly is the relationship for cancer patients?

Authors:  Bharat B Aggarwal; Prashasnika Gehlot
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.547

6.  COX2 expression in high-grade breast cancer: evidence for prognostic significance in the subset of triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Bar Chikman; Sergey Vasyanovich; Ron Lavy; Liliana Habler; Gleb Tolstov; Andronik Kapiev; Ariel Halevy; Judith Sandbank
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Weak expression of cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with poorer outcome in endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: analysis of data from randomized trial between radiation alone versus concurrent chemo-radiation (SQNP-01).

Authors:  Susan Li Er Loong; Jacqueline Siok Gek Hwang; Hui Hua Li; Joseph Tien Seng Wee; Swee Peng Yap; Melvin Lee Kiang Chua; Kam Weng Fong; Terence Wee Kiat Tan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in non-metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Kailash Mosalpuria; Carolyn Hall; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Ashutosh Lodhi; D Michael Hallman; Mary S Baraniuk; Anirban Bhattacharyya; Anthony Lucci
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-23

Review 9.  A systematic review to establish the frequency of cyclooxygenase-2 expression in normal breast epithelium, ductal carcinoma in situ, microinvasive carcinoma of the breast and invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Glover; C M Hughes; M M Cantwell; L J Murray
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prognostic influence of cyclooxygenase-2 protein and mRNA expression in node-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Isabel Sicking; Karlien Rommens; Marco J Battista; Daniel Böhm; Susanne Gebhard; Antje Lebrecht; Cristina Cotarelo; Gerald Hoffmann; Jan G Hengstler; Marcus Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.