OBJECTIVES: Weekly paclitaxel (WP) has been reported to have significant activity in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer patients while retaining a favorable toxicity profile. This study assessed the current usage of WP in routine clinical practice in a tertiary cancer center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective audit in 53 patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer treated with WP (80-100 mg/m(2)) over a 2-year period (Nov 2003-Nov 2005). Toxicity was assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria, and response was evaluated using radiological and CA-125 criteria. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 69 (36-86) and previously received a median of 3 treatments (range 1-7). A median of 13 weekly doses of paclitaxel (range 1-39) were given. The response rate was 48% by radiological criteria and 69% by CA-125 assessment. Grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (13% of patients), peripheral neuropathy (11%) and neutropenia (8%) and there were no grade 4 toxicities. The median progression-free survival was 4. 8 months and median survival was 13. 5 months. There was no significant difference in efficacy between those 24 patients previously treated with taxanes (radiol. response 43%/CA-125 response 63%) and those 29 patients who had not received prior taxanes (radiol. response 52%/CA-125 response 76%). There was also no difference in efficacy for patients with platinum-free or treatment-free intervals of less than 6 months compared to 6 months or longer. CONCLUSIONS: WP is a well tolerated and active regimen in patients with pre-treated ovarian cancer and its use in recurrent disease is likely to increase. Further studies should aim to assess the importance of the "paclitaxel-free interval" in predicting response in relapsed disease, along similar lines as are now established for platinums.
OBJECTIVES: Weekly paclitaxel (WP) has been reported to have significant activity in patients with ovarian and primary peritoneal cancerpatients while retaining a favorable toxicity profile. This study assessed the current usage of WP in routine clinical practice in a tertiary cancer center. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective audit in 53 patients with recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer treated with WP (80-100 mg/m(2)) over a 2-year period (Nov 2003-Nov 2005). Toxicity was assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria, and response was evaluated using radiological and CA-125 criteria. RESULTS:Patients had a median age of 69 (36-86) and previously received a median of 3 treatments (range 1-7). A median of 13 weekly doses of paclitaxel (range 1-39) were given. The response rate was 48% by radiological criteria and 69% by CA-125 assessment. Grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (13% of patients), peripheral neuropathy (11%) and neutropenia (8%) and there were no grade 4 toxicities. The median progression-free survival was 4. 8 months and median survival was 13. 5 months. There was no significant difference in efficacy between those 24 patients previously treated with taxanes (radiol. response 43%/CA-125 response 63%) and those 29 patients who had not received prior taxanes (radiol. response 52%/CA-125 response 76%). There was also no difference in efficacy for patients with platinum-free or treatment-free intervals of less than 6 months compared to 6 months or longer. CONCLUSIONS: WP is a well tolerated and active regimen in patients with pre-treated ovarian cancer and its use in recurrent disease is likely to increase. Further studies should aim to assess the importance of the "paclitaxel-free interval" in predicting response in relapsed disease, along similar lines as are now established for platinums.
Authors: A Stathis; D Hess; R von Moos; K Homicsko; G Griguolo; M Joerger; M Mark; C J Ackermann; S Allegrini; C V Catapano; A Xyrafas; M Enoiu; S Berardi; P Gargiulo; C Sessa Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Gerald Falchook; Robert L Coleman; Andrzej Roszak; Kian Behbakht; Ursula Matulonis; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Piotr Sawrycki; Linda R Duska; William Tew; Sharad Ghamande; Anne Lesoin; Peter E Schwartz; Joseph Buscema; Michel Fabbro; Alain Lortholary; Barbara Goff; Razelle Kurzrock; Lainie P Martin; Heidi J Gray; Siqing Fu; Emily Sheldon-Waniga; Huamao Mark Lin; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; Xiaofei Zhou; E Jane Leonard; Russell J Schilder Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 31.777