Gerald Falchook1, Robert L Coleman2, Andrzej Roszak3, Kian Behbakht4, Ursula Matulonis5, Isabelle Ray-Coquard6, Piotr Sawrycki7, Linda R Duska8, William Tew9, Sharad Ghamande10, Anne Lesoin11, Peter E Schwartz12, Joseph Buscema13, Michel Fabbro14, Alain Lortholary15, Barbara Goff16, Razelle Kurzrock17, Lainie P Martin18, Heidi J Gray16, Siqing Fu2, Emily Sheldon-Waniga19, Huamao Mark Lin19, Karthik Venkatakrishnan19, Xiaofei Zhou19, E Jane Leonard19, Russell J Schilder20. 1. Sarah Cannon Research Institute at HealthONE, Denver, Colorado. 2. University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 3. Greater Poland Cancer Centre/University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. 4. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora. 5. Gynecologic Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Centre Léon Bérard & University Claude Bernard, Lyon, France. 7. Department of Oncology and Chemotherapy, L. Rydygiera District Hospital, Torun, Poland. 8. University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville. 9. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 10. Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia. 11. Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France. 12. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 13. Arizona Oncology Associates PC, Tucson, Arizona. 14. Institut Regional du Cancer, Montpellier, France. 15. Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France. 16. University of Washington, Seattle. 17. San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California. 18. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 19. Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc (a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited), Cambridge, Massachusetts. 20. Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: There is an unmet medical need for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, and new approaches are needed to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Objective: This phase 1/2 study evaluated the activity of alisertib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with breast (phase 1) and ovarian cancer (phase 1 and phase 2). Design, Setting, and Participants: An open-label phase 1 and randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted from April 16, 2010, for phase 1 and March 28, 2012, to August 12, 2013, for phase 2 was conducted at 33 sites (United States, France, and Poland). Data are reported from a cutoff date of August 12, 2014, with a median duration of follow-up of 7.2 months in the alisertib plus paclitaxel arm and 4.6 months in the paclitaxel arm. A total of 191 women with advanced breast (phase 1 only) or recurrent ovarian cancer were enrolled, including 142 patients randomized toalisertib plus paclitaxel (n = 73) or paclitaxel alone (n = 69) in the phase 2 study. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 stratified by platinum-free interval (refractory, 0-6 months, 6-12 months) and prior weekly taxane treatment (yes, no) to receive alisertib 40 mg twice per day orally and 3 days on and 4 days off for 3 weeks, plus paclitaxel (60 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1, 8, and 15), or weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously in 28-day cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary endpoint was PFS; primary efficacy analysis and safety analysis used modified intention to treat (mITT) population (all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug). Results: The median age for the 191 patients enrolled in phase 1 was 59 (range, 29-75) years. The median age for the 142 patients enrolled in phase 2 was 63 (range, 30-81) years for patients receiving alisertib plus paclitaxel and 61 (range, 41-81) years for patients receivingpaclitaxel. At data cutoff, 107 (75%) patients had a documented PFS event; 52 (71%) in the alisertib plus paclitaxel arm, and 55 (80%) in the paclitaxel arm. Median PFS was 6.7 months with alisertib plus paclitaxel vs 4.7 months with paclitaxel (HR, 0.75; 80% CI, 0.58-0.96; P = .14; 2-sided P value cutoff = .20 to be considered worthy of further investigation). Drug-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 63 (86%) vs 14 (20%) patients in the alisertib plus paclitaxel and paclitaxel arms, including 56 (77%) vs 7 (10%) neutropenia, 18 (25%) vs 0 stomatitis, and 10 (14%) vs 2 (3%) anemia; 54 (74%) vs 17 (25%) had adverse events leading to dose reductions. Two patients died during the study (1 in each arm); neither death was considered related to study drug. Conclusions and Relevance: The primary endpoint, PFS, significantly favored alisertib plus paclitaxel over paclitaxel alone. Further investigation is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01091428.
RCT Entities:
Importance: There is an unmet medical need for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer, and new approaches are needed to improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Objective: This phase 1/2 study evaluated the activity of alisertib in combination with weekly paclitaxel in patients with breast (phase 1) and ovarian cancer (phase 1 and phase 2). Design, Setting, and Participants: An open-label phase 1 and randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted from April 16, 2010, for phase 1 and March 28, 2012, to August 12, 2013, for phase 2 was conducted at 33 sites (United States, France, and Poland). Data are reported from a cutoff date of August 12, 2014, with a median duration of follow-up of 7.2 months in the alisertib plus paclitaxel arm and 4.6 months in the paclitaxel arm. A total of 191 women with advanced breast (phase 1 only) or recurrent ovarian cancer were enrolled, including 142 patients randomized to alisertib plus paclitaxel (n = 73) or paclitaxel alone (n = 69) in the phase 2 study. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 stratified by platinum-free interval (refractory, 0-6 months, 6-12 months) and prior weekly taxane treatment (yes, no) to receive alisertib 40 mg twice per day orally and 3 days on and 4 days off for 3 weeks, plus paclitaxel (60 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1, 8, and 15), or weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously in 28-day cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary endpoint was PFS; primary efficacy analysis and safety analysis used modified intention to treat (mITT) population (all randomized patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug). Results: The median age for the 191 patients enrolled in phase 1 was 59 (range, 29-75) years. The median age for the 142 patients enrolled in phase 2 was 63 (range, 30-81) years for patients receiving alisertib plus paclitaxel and 61 (range, 41-81) years for patients receiving paclitaxel. At data cutoff, 107 (75%) patients had a documented PFS event; 52 (71%) in the alisertib plus paclitaxel arm, and 55 (80%) in the paclitaxel arm. Median PFS was 6.7 months with alisertib plus paclitaxel vs 4.7 months with paclitaxel (HR, 0.75; 80% CI, 0.58-0.96; P = .14; 2-sided P value cutoff = .20 to be considered worthy of further investigation). Drug-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported in 63 (86%) vs 14 (20%) patients in the alisertib plus paclitaxel and paclitaxel arms, including 56 (77%) vs 7 (10%) neutropenia, 18 (25%) vs 0 stomatitis, and 10 (14%) vs 2 (3%) anemia; 54 (74%) vs 17 (25%) had adverse events leading to dose reductions. Two patients died during the study (1 in each arm); neither death was considered related to study drug. Conclusions and Relevance: The primary endpoint, PFS, significantly favored alisertib plus paclitaxel over paclitaxel alone. Further investigation is warranted. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01091428.
Authors: Ursula A Matulonis; Sudarshan Sharma; Sharad Ghamande; Michael S Gordon; Salvatore A Del Prete; Isabelle Ray-Coquard; Elzbieta Kutarska; Hua Liu; Howard Fingert; Xiaofei Zhou; Hadi Danaee; Russell J Schilder Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Julie N Graff; Celestia S Higano; Noah M Hahn; Matthew H Taylor; Bin Zhang; Xiaofei Zhou; Karthik Venkatakrishnan; E Jane Leonard; John Sarantopoulos Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: D Belotti; V Vergani; T Drudis; P Borsotti; M R Pitelli; G Viale; R Giavazzi; G Taraboletti Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Laura J Havrilesky; Angeles A Alvarez; Robyn A Sayer; Johnathan M Lancaster; John T Soper; Andrew Berchuck; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Gustavo C Rodriguez; Michael E Carney Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Julia L Boland; Qin Zhou; Alexia E Iasonos; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Jason Konner; Margaret Callahan; Claire Friedman; Carol Aghajanian; Paul Sabbatini; Dmitriy Zamarin; Karen A Cadoo Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Haoyan Li; Yin Wang; Kevin Lin; Varadha Balaji Venkadakrishnan; Martin Bakht; Wei Shi; Chenling Meng; Jie Zhang; Kaitlyn Tremble; Xin Liang; Jian H Song; Xu Feng; Vivien Van; Pingna Deng; Jared K Burks; Ana Aparicio; Khandan Keyomarsi; Junjie Chen; Yue Lu; Himisha Beltran; Di Zhao Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Thomas J Semrad; Edward J Kim; I-Yeh Gong; Tianhong Li; Scott Christensen; Mili Arora; Jonathan W Riess; David R Gandara; Karen Kelly Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Vladislav Korobeynikov; Michelle Borakove; Yayi Feng; William M Wuest; Alex B Koval; Anna S Nikonova; Ilya Serebriiskii; Jonathan Chernoff; Virginia F Borges; Erica A Golemis; Elena Shagisultanova Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Katherine N Lynch; Joyce F Liu; Nikolas Kesten; Kin-Hoe Chow; Aniket Shetty; Ruiyang He; Mosammat Faria Afreen; Liping Yuan; Ursula A Matulonis; Whitfield B Growdon; Michael G Muto; Neil S Horowitz; Colleen M Feltmate; Michael J Worley; Ross S Berkowitz; Christopher P Crum; Bo R Rueda; Sarah J Hill Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Katie A Thies; Matthew W Cole; Rachel E Schafer; Jonathan M Spehar; Dillon S Richardson; Sarah A Steck; Manjusri Das; Arthur W Lian; Alo Ray; Reena Shakya; Sue E Knoblaugh; Cynthia D Timmers; Michael C Ostrowski; Arnab Chakravarti; Gina M Sizemore; Steven T Sizemore Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Jianwen Hao; Qizhen Peng; Keruo Wang; Ge Yu; Yi Pan; Xiaoling Du; Na Hu; Xuening Zhang; Yu Qin; Huikai Li Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 3.411