PURPOSE: To validate a commercial database of community-level physical activity facilities that can be used in future research examining associations between access to physical activity facilities and individual-level physical activity and obesity. METHODS: Physical activity facility characteristics and locations obtained from a commercial database were compared to a field census conducted in 80 census block groups within two U.S. communities. Agreement statistics, agreement of administratively defined neighborhoods, and distance between locations were used to quantify count, attribute, and positional error. RESULTS: There was moderate agreement (concordance: nonurban: 0.39; urban: 0.46) of presence of any physical activity facility and poor to moderate agreement (kappa range: 0.14 to 0.76) of physical activity facility type. The mean Euclidean distance between commercial database versus field census locations was 757 and 35 m in the nonurban and urban communities, respectively. However, 94% and 100% of nonurban and urban physical activity facilities, respectively, fell into the same 5-digit ZIP code, dropping to 92% and 98% in the same block group and 71% along the same street. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the commercial database of physical activity facilities may contain appreciable error, but patterns of error suggest that built environment-health associations are likely biased downward.
PURPOSE: To validate a commercial database of community-level physical activity facilities that can be used in future research examining associations between access to physical activity facilities and individual-level physical activity and obesity. METHODS: Physical activity facility characteristics and locations obtained from a commercial database were compared to a field census conducted in 80 census block groups within two U.S. communities. Agreement statistics, agreement of administratively defined neighborhoods, and distance between locations were used to quantify count, attribute, and positional error. RESULTS: There was moderate agreement (concordance: nonurban: 0.39; urban: 0.46) of presence of any physical activity facility and poor to moderate agreement (kappa range: 0.14 to 0.76) of physical activity facility type. The mean Euclidean distance between commercial database versus field census locations was 757 and 35 m in the nonurban and urban communities, respectively. However, 94% and 100% of nonurban and urban physical activity facilities, respectively, fell into the same 5-digit ZIP code, dropping to 92% and 98% in the same block group and 71% along the same street. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the commercial database of physical activity facilities may contain appreciable error, but patterns of error suggest that built environment-health associations are likely biased downward.
Authors: Matthew R Bonner; Daikwon Han; Jing Nie; Peter Rogerson; John E Vena; Jo L Freudenheim Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Thomas McGinn; Peter C Wyer; Thomas B Newman; Sheri Keitz; Rosanne Leipzig; Gordon Guyatt For Journal: CMAJ Date: 2004-11-23 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Deborah A Cohen; J Scott Ashwood; Molly M Scott; Adrian Overton; Kelly R Evenson; Lisa K Staten; Dwayne Porter; Thomas L McKenzie; Diane Catellier Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kelly R Evenson; Amanda S Birnbaum; Ariane L Bedimo-Rung; James F Sallis; Carolyn C Voorhees; Kimberly Ring; John P Elder Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2006-09-14 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Matthew J Strickland; Csaba Siffel; Bennett R Gardner; Alissa K Berzen; Adolfo Correa Journal: Environ Health Date: 2007-04-04 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Katie M Heinrich; Joseph Hughey; Anthony Randles; Dustin Wall; N Andrew Peterson; Nattinee Jitnarin; LaVerne Berkel; Peter Eaton; Doug Bowles; C Keith Haddock; W S Carlos Poston Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Nicole Larson; Jonathan M Miller; Marla E Eisenberg; Allison W Watts; Mary Story; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: Appetite Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Tanya K Kaufman; Andrew Rundle; Kathryn M Neckerman; Daniel M Sheehan; Gina S Lovasi; Jana A Hirsch Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Sydney A Jones; Latetia V Moore; Kari Moore; Melissa Zagorski; Shannon J Brines; Ana V Diez Roux; Kelly R Evenson Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Jennifer A Makelarski; Stacy Tessler Lindau; Vanessa D Fabbre; Colleen M Grogan; Eugene M Sadhu; Jonathan C Silverstein; Thuy Tien T Tran; Martha Van Haitsma; Eric Whitaker; Daniel Johnson Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Angela D Liese; Natalie Colabianchi; Archana P Lamichhane; Timothy L Barnes; James D Hibbert; Dwayne E Porter; Michele D Nichols; Andrew B Lawson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 4.897