Literature DB >> 17079539

Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls.

Deborah A Cohen1, J Scott Ashwood, Molly M Scott, Adrian Overton, Kelly R Evenson, Lisa K Staten, Dwayne Porter, Thomas L McKenzie, Diane Catellier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Physical activity may be constrained or facilitated by local environments. The availability of neighborhood facilities for physical activity may be particularly relevant for youth, who are unable to drive and whose activity is often limited to the immediate distance they are able to walk or bicycle. Several studies have shown that proximity to recreational facilities and parks is one of the most important predictors of physical activity. Because the United States already has an extensive infrastructure of parks, with 70% of adults indicating that they live within walking distance of a park or playground, parks may be a potential venue for increasing physical activity. This might be particularly important for adolescent girls, whose physical activity levels decline substantially as they go through puberty. The goal of this study was to examine the association between park proximity, park type, and park features and physical activity in adolescent girls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study using baseline data from the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls. It included 1556 grade 6 girls who were randomly selected from 6 middle schools in each of the following 6 field site areas: Washington, DC, and Baltimore, Maryland; Columbia, South Carolina; Minneapolis, Minnesota; New Orleans, Louisiana; Tucson, Arizona; and San Diego, California. Girls wore accelerometers for 6 days to measure metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, a measure accounting for the volume and intensity of activity. Metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was calculated for the hours outside of school time using 2 different cutpoints, activity levels > or = 3.0 metabolic equivalents and > or = 4.6 metabolic equivalents, the latter indicating activity at the intensity of a brisk walk or higher. We mapped all of the parks within 1 mile of each girl's home. Trained staff used a checklist to document the presence of facilities and amenities at each park, including passive amenities, such as drinking fountains, restrooms, and areas with shade, as well as active amenities like basketball courts, multipurpose fields, playgrounds, and tennis courts.
RESULTS: Mean nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity, using the 4.6 metabolic equivalent cutoff, was 611.1 minutes (range: 49.7-4718.6 metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days) and 1704.8 metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days (range: 276.2-5792.6 metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days) when using the 3.0 metabolic equivalent cutpoint. Many girls had multiple parks within a 1-mile radius of their homes: 57% had > or = 1 type of park, the majority being neighborhood or community parks; 42% had between 1 and 3 parks, 37% had > or = 4 parks, and 14% had > or = 8 parks. The type, number, and specific parks features were associated with girls' nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity. At the 4.6 metabolic equivalent cutpoint, higher levels of nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity were associated with both neighborhood and community parks (22 metabolic equivalent minutes) and miniparks (40 metabolic equivalent minutes). Each park, regardless of type, in the half-mile around each girl's home was associated with an increase in nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity by 2.8% or 17.2 nonschool minutes of metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity per 6 days. Beyond a half-mile, each park increased nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity by 1.1% or 6.7 metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days. For the average girl with 3.5 parks within a 1-mile radius of home, the presence of parks accounted for 36.5 extra nonschool metabolic equivalent minutes per 6 days, approximately 6% of total nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity. Using the 3.0 metabolic equivalent cutpoint, this sums to an additional 68 metabolic equivalent minutes of nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity over 6 days, or 4% of the total. The most common amenities in the parks were playgrounds, multipurpose fields, and picnic areas. Slightly more than one third of girls lived within a half-mile of a park with a basketball court, and > 20% had access to walking paths and tennis courts in their local park. Higher levels of nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity per 6 days were associated with walking paths (13 metabolic equivalent minutes), running tracks (82 metabolic equivalent minutes), playgrounds (28 metabolic equivalent minutes), and basketball courts (30 metabolic equivalent minutes). Parks with streetlights and floodlights were also associated with an increase of 18 and 22 minutes of nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity, respectively. With the 3.0 metabolic equivalent cutoff for metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity, additional nonschool metabolic equivalent minutes more than doubled when girls had miniparks (92 metabolic equivalent minutes), natural resource areas (36 metabolic equivalent minutes), walking paths (59 metabolic equivalent minutes), and running tracks (208 metabolic equivalent minutes) within a half-mile of their homes. Skateboard areas and special-use parks were negatively associated with nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity in adolescent girls.
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent girls who live near more parks, particularly near those with amenities that are conducive to walking and with active features, engage in more nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity than those with fewer parks. Whether this is because of actual use of the parks or neighborhood choice could not be determined. Although the magnitude of the association between parks and additional minutes of metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity was small for an individual, amounting to an average of 4%-6% of a girl's total nonschool metabolic equivalent-weighted moderate/vigorous physical activity, it is likely to have a large population-level association. Because of the potential population level impact, the use of parks to promote physical activity should be further studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17079539      PMCID: PMC2239262          DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-1226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  11 in total

Review 1.  A different route to health: implications of transport policies.

Authors:  C Dora
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-19

2.  Objective physical activity of filipino youth stratified for commuting mode to school.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Barbara E Ainsworth; Linda S Adair; Barry M Popkin
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity, and morbidity.

Authors:  Reid Ewing; Tom Schmid; Richard Killingsworth; Amy Zlot; Stephen Raudenbush
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

4.  Barriers to children walking and biking to school--United States, 1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Physical activity cost of the school run: impact on schoolchildren of being driven to school (EarlyBird 22).

Authors:  Brad Metcalf; Linda Voss; Alison Jeffery; Jenny Perkins; Terry Wilkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-18

6.  Access to pedestrian roads, daily activities, and physical performance of adolescents.

Authors:  A N Sjolie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Design of the Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls (TAAG).

Authors:  June Stevens; David M Murray; Diane J Catellier; Peter J Hannan; Leslie A Lytle; John P Elder; Deborah R Young; Denise G Simons-Morton; Larry S Webber
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 8.  Active commuting to school: an overlooked source of childrens' physical activity?

Authors:  C Tudor-Locke; B E Ainsworth; B M Popkin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars.

Authors:  Lawrence D Frank; Martin A Andresen; Thomas L Schmid
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Commuting to school: are children who walk more physically active?

Authors:  Ashley R Cooper; Angie S Page; Lucy J Foster; Dina Qahwaji
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  112 in total

1.  Rural Latino youth park use: characteristics, park amenities, and physical activity.

Authors:  Cynthia K Perry; Brain E Saelens; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-06

2.  Physical activity trajectories and multilevel factors among adolescent girls.

Authors:  Kathleen R Zook; Brit I Saksvig; Tong Tong Wu; Deborah Rohm Young
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Sedentary activity and body composition of middle school girls: the trial of activity for adolescent girls.

Authors:  Charlotte Pratt; Larry S Webber; Chris D Baggett; Dianne Ward; Russell R Pate; David Murray; Timothy Lohman; Leslie Lytle; John P Elder
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Physical activity, black carbon exposure and airway inflammation in an urban adolescent cohort.

Authors:  Stephanie Lovinsky-Desir; Kyung Hwa Jung; Andrew G Rundle; Lori A Hoepner; Joshua B Bautista; Frederica P Perera; Steven N Chillrud; Matthew S Perzanowski; Rachel L Miller
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Overweight in Latino preschoolers: do parental health beliefs matter?

Authors:  Margaret Kersey; Rebecca Lipton; Michael T Quinn; John D Lantos
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2010 May-Jun

6.  Neighborhood park use by children: use of accelerometry and global positioning systems.

Authors:  Genevieve Fridlund Dunton; Estela Almanza; Michael Jerrett; Jennifer Wolch; Mary Ann Pentz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Neighborhood design and perceptions: relationship with active commuting.

Authors:  Carolyn C Voorhees; Scott Ashwood; Kelly R Evenson; John R Sirard; Ariane L Rung; Marsha Dowda; Thomas L Mckenzie
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness, low physical activity and an urban environment are independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk in children.

Authors:  S Kriemler; S Manser-Wenger; L Zahner; C Braun-Fahrländer; C Schindler; J J Puder
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 9.  Encouraging walking for transport and physical activity in children and adolescents: how important is the built environment?

Authors:  Billie Giles-Corti; Sally F Kelty; Stephen R Zubrick; Karen P Villanueva
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Environmental factors of obesity in communities with native Hawaiians.

Authors:  Marjorie K Mau; Kara N Wong; Jimmy Efird; Margaret West; Erin P Saito; Jay Maddock
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.