Literature DB >> 18258991

Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease.

Julie R Gralow1, Harold J Burstein, William Wood, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Luca Gianni, Gunter von Minckwitz, Aman U Buzdar, Ian E Smith, William F Symmans, Baljit Singh, Eric P Winer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the state of the science with respect to preoperative systemic therapy and pathologic assessment in operable breast cancer.
METHODS: This article reviews data presented at the National Cancer Institute State of the Science Conference on Preoperative Therapy in Invasive Breast Cancer as well as supporting published data.
RESULTS: Preoperative chemotherapy in operable breast cancer has been shown to improve breast conservation rates as a result of tumor response to therapy. When patients are given preoperative systemic therapy, regimens should be the same as those established as safe and active in the adjuvant setting. At present, there are no data to suggest that systemic treatment should be tailored based on initial tumor response, or based on the extent of residual disease. In operable breast cancer, there seems to be no survival advantage from initiation of systemic therapy before surgery. A variety of clinical, imaging, and pathologic measurements are available to gauge tumor response to treatment. There is a clear correlation between tumor response in the breast and lymph nodes and both disease-free and overall survival. Pathologic complete response and other pathologic measures may be useful as surrogate end points in evaluating and understanding new therapies.
CONCLUSION: In operable breast cancer, preoperative systemic therapy is effective and can improve breast conservation rates. Unless the tumor is large or the patient is in a clinical trial, postoperative adjuvant systemic therapy is the standard of care. To achieve optimal outcomes, preoperative systemic therapy must be administered as part of a coordinated, multimodality treatment program. The preoperative setting provides a unique opportunity to study the impact of systemic therapies on breast cancer biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18258991     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  113 in total

1.  Breast cancer: Neoadjuvant bevacizumab treatment-signal or noise?

Authors:  Harold J Burstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Early monitoring of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT: defining a clinical aim.

Authors:  David Groheux; Sylvie Giacchetti; Marc Espié; Domenico Rubello; Jean-luc Moretti; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Donald A Berry; Angela DeMichele; Lisa Carey; Sarah E Davis; Meredith Buxton; Cliff Hudis; Joe W Gray; Charles Perou; Christina Yau; Chad Livasy; Helen Krontiras; Leslie Montgomery; Debasish Tripathy; Constance Lehman; Minetta C Liu; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Hope S Rugo; John T Carpenter; Lynn Dressler; David Chhieng; Baljit Singh; Carolyn Mies; Joseph Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Dilip Giri; Laura van 't Veer; Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Does response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy impact breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Babak Mehrara; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Utility of DNA postreplication repair protein Rad6B in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Malathy P V Shekhar; Laura A Biernat; Nat Pernick; Larry Tait; Judith Abrams; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: assessing treatment progress and managing poor responders.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Georg Thomas Budd
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Quantitative assessment Ki-67 score for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason R Brown; Michael P DiGiovanna; Brigid Killelea; Donald R Lannin; David L Rimm
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 8.  New horizons in imaging and surgical assessment of breast cancer lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Firouzeh Arjmandi; Ann Mootz; Deborah Farr; Sangeetha Reddy; Basak Dogan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Prospective phase II study of neoadjuvant doxorubicin followed by cisplatin/docetaxel in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Taher A Al-Tweigeri; Dahish S Ajarim; Adher A Alsayed; Mohamed M Rahal; Mohamed O Alshabanah; Asma M Tulbah; Osama A Al-Malik; Doha M Fatani; Gamal A El-Husseiny; Naser B Elkum; Adnan A Ezzat
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  Landmark trials in the medical oncology management of early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Whitney Hensing; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Lindsay L Peterson; Jennifer Y Sheng
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.