Literature DB >> 18258988

Statement of the science concerning locoregional treatments after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer: a National Cancer Institute conference.

Thomas A Buchholz1, Constance D Lehman, Jay R Harris, Barbara A Pockaj, Nagi Khouri, Nola F Hylton, Michael J Miller, Timothy Whelan, Lori J Pierce, Laura J Esserman, Lisa A Newman, Barbara L Smith, Harry D Bear, Eleftherios P Mamounas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the state of the science with respect to diagnostic imaging and locoregional therapy for patients with breast cancer receiving preoperative chemotherapy.
METHODS: Published data relevant to clinical staging, monitoring of tumor response, and locoregional therapy for patients with breast cancer treated with preoperative chemotherapy were reviewed.
RESULTS: High-quality data from prospective randomized trials are limited. Available data suggest that locoregional therapy decisions should be based on both the pretreatment clinical extent of disease and the pathologic extent of the disease after chemotherapy. Accordingly, physical examination and imaging studies that accurately define the initial extent of disease are required before treatment. Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be performed either before or after preoperative chemotherapy for patients with clinical N0 disease. The success of breast conservation after preoperative chemotherapy depends on careful patient selection and achieving negative surgical margins. Adjuvant breast radiation is indicated for all patients treated with breast conservation. For patients treated with mastectomy, chest-wall and regional nodal radiation should be considered for those who present with clinical stage III disease or have histologically positive lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy. Additional prospective studies are needed to determine the value of postmastectomy radiation for patients with stage II breast cancer who have negative lymph nodes after chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: The increased use of preoperative chemotherapy has raised new questions concerning the optimal methods to stage and monitor disease response to treatment and how to optimize locoregional treatment. The available evidence suggests that a multidisciplinary approach improves outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18258988     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.0326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  50 in total

1.  Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL--CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657.

Authors:  Laura J Esserman; Donald A Berry; Angela DeMichele; Lisa Carey; Sarah E Davis; Meredith Buxton; Cliff Hudis; Joe W Gray; Charles Perou; Christina Yau; Chad Livasy; Helen Krontiras; Leslie Montgomery; Debasish Tripathy; Constance Lehman; Minetta C Liu; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Hope S Rugo; John T Carpenter; Lynn Dressler; David Chhieng; Baljit Singh; Carolyn Mies; Joseph Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Dilip Giri; Laura van 't Veer; Nola Hylton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Postmastectomy radiation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: review and interpretation of available data.

Authors:  Amar U Kishan; Susan A McCloskey
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: assessing treatment progress and managing poor responders.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Georg Thomas Budd
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Quantitative assessment Ki-67 score for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jason R Brown; Michael P DiGiovanna; Brigid Killelea; Donald R Lannin; David L Rimm
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 5.662

5.  Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: use and trends in radiotherapy practice.

Authors:  T A Koulis; K Beecham; C Speers; S Tyldesley; D Voduc; C Simmons; R Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Recent developments in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Fitzal; O Riedl; R Jakesz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for assessing tumor response in patients with HER2-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with molecular biomarker profile.

Authors:  Aida Kuzucan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Shadfar Bahri; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Peter T Fwu; Hon J Yu; David J B Hsiang; Karen T Lane; John A Butler; Stephen A Feig; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Interdisciplinary GoR level III Guidelines for the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up Care of Breast Cancer: Short version - AWMF Registry No.: 032-045OL AWMF-Register-Nummer: 032-045OL - Kurzversion 3.0, Juli 2012.

Authors:  R Kreienberg; U-S Albert; M Follmann; I B Kopp; T Kühn; A Wöckel
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  MRI and Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast and Axilla after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph J Weber; Maxine S Jochelson; Anne Eaton; Emily C Zabor; Andrea V Barrio; Mary L Gemignani; Melissa Pilewskie; Kimberly J Van Zee; Monica Morrow; Mahmoud El-Tamer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Noninvasive monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using optical tomography with ultrasound localization.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Susan Tannenbaum; Poornima Hegde; Mark Kane; Chen Xu; Scott H Kurtzman
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.