Literature DB >> 18258156

Ischemic preconditioning during the use of the PercuSurge occlusion balloon for carotid angioplasty and stenting.

Peter L Faries1, Brian DeRubertis, Susan Trocciola, John Karwowski, K Craig Kent, Rabih A Chaer.   

Abstract

Ischemic preconditioning (IP) uses transient ischemia to render tissues tolerant to subsequent, prolonged ischemia. This study sought to evaluate factors that contributed to the development of cerebral ischemia during PercuSurge balloon (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) occlusion in patients undergoing carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). The PercuSurge occlusion balloon was used in 43 of 165 patients treated with CAS for high-grade stenosis; 20% were symptomatic. Symptoms of cerebral hypoperfusion during temporary occlusion of the internal carotid artery occurred in 10 of 43 patients and included dysarthria, agitation, decreased level of consciousness, and focal hemispheric deficit. The development of neurologic symptoms after initial PercuSurge balloon inflation and occluded internal carotid artery flow was associated with a decrease in the mean Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) from 15 to 10 (range 9-14); the GCS returned to normal after occlusion balloon deflation. The mean time to spontaneous recovery of full neurologic function was 8 minutes (range 4-15 minutes). The mean subsequent procedure duration was 11.9 minutes (range 6-21 minutes). No recurrence of neurologic symptoms occurred when the occlusion balloon was reinflated. All 10 patients underwent successful CAS without occlusion, dissection, cerebrovascular accident, or death. Ischemic preconditioning can be used to enable CAS with embolic protection in patients who cannot tolerate initial interruption of antegrade cerebral perfusion by PercuSurge occlusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18258156     DOI: 10.2310/6670.2008.00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vascular        ISSN: 1708-5381            Impact factor:   1.285


  6 in total

1.  Rationale and Design for the Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

Authors:  Natalie D Sridharan; Darve Robinson; Partha Thirumala; Ali Arak; Oladipupo Olafiranye; Edith Tzeng; Efthymios Avgerinos
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  Remote ischemic limb preconditioning after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a phase Ib study of safety and feasibility.

Authors:  Sebastian Koch; Michael Katsnelson; Chuanhui Dong; Miguel Perez-Pinzon
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Preconditioning the human brain: practical considerations for proving cerebral protection.

Authors:  Sebastian Koch
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.829

4.  Should the STAIR criteria be modified for preconditioning studies?

Authors:  Michael M Wang; Guohua Xi; Richard F Keep
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Collaterals: an important determinant of prolonged ischemic penumbra versus rapid cerebral infarction?

Authors:  Elisabeth Breese Marsh; Richard Leigh; Martin Radvany; Philippe Gailloud; Rafael H Llinas
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on cerebral vasospasm, biomarkers of cerebral ischemia, and functional outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (ERVAS): A randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  R P Sangeetha; Ramesh J Venkatapura; Sriganesh Kamath; Rita Christopher; Dhananjaya Ishwar Bhat; H R Arvinda; Dhritiman Chakrabarti
Journal:  Brain Circ       Date:  2021-05-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.