Literature DB >> 21415404

Remote ischemic limb preconditioning after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a phase Ib study of safety and feasibility.

Sebastian Koch1, Michael Katsnelson, Chuanhui Dong, Miguel Perez-Pinzon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Making a limb transiently ischemic has been shown to induce ischemic tolerance in a distant organ. This phenomenon is known as remote ischemic limb preconditioning. We conducted a Phase IB study of remote ischemic limb preconditioning to determine the safety and feasibility of increasing durations of limb ischemia in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.
METHODS: Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage underwent limb preconditioning every 24 to 48 hours for 14 days. Limb preconditioning consisted of 3 5-minute inflations of a blood pressure cuff to 200 mm Hg around a limb followed by 5 minutes of reperfusion. In the lead-in phase, we preconditioned the upper extremities, but this proved impractical and we began preconditioning the leg in a similar manner. Ischemia times were then escalated to 7.5 and 10 minutes. After each session, a visual analog scale was obtained and the extremity examined for neurovascular complications.
RESULTS: A total of 33 patients completed the study. Mean age was 53±12 years and mean Hunt Hess score was 2.4±0.9. In the lead-in phase, an average of 7.7±2.4 preconditioning sessions was completed with mean visual analog scale 3.6±3.4. In the dose escalation phase, an average of 8.6±2.1 preconditioning sessions was done with mean visual analog scale 1.8±2.2 and 2.5±2.9 for the 7.5- and 10-minute cohorts, respectively. No session was prematurely terminated due to subject discomfort. No objective signs of neurovascular injury were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: We found limb preconditioning to be safe and well tolerated, even at ischemia times of 10 minutes, in critically ill patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21415404      PMCID: PMC3082628          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  31 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on children undergoing cardiac surgery: first clinical application in humans.

Authors:  Michael M H Cheung; Rajesh K Kharbanda; Igor E Konstantinov; Mikiko Shimizu; Helena Frndova; Jia Li; Helen M Holtby; Peter N Cox; Jeffrey F Smallhorn; Glen S Van Arsdell; Andrew N Redington
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Remote ischemic preconditioning for cerebral and cardiac protection during carotid endarterectomy: results from a pilot randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Stewart R Walsh; S A Nouraei; Tjun Y Tang; Umar Sadat; Roger H Carpenter; Michael E Gaunt
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 1.089

Review 3.  Ischemic tolerance.

Authors:  Takaaki Kirino
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Remote ischemic preconditioning in human coronary artery bypass surgery: from promise to disappointment?

Authors:  Ishtiaq A Rahman; Jorge G Mascaro; Rick P Steeds; Michael P Frenneaux; Peter Nightingale; Peter Gosling; Peter Townsend; John N Townend; David Green; Robert S Bonser
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Preconditioning the human brain: practical considerations for proving cerebral protection.

Authors:  Sebastian Koch
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Limb remote-preconditioning protects against focal ischemia in rats and contradicts the dogma of therapeutic time windows for preconditioning.

Authors:  C Ren; X Gao; G K Steinberg; H Zhao
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  The role of extracellular signal-regulated kinases in the neuroprotection of limb ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Rui-Li Jin; Wen-Bin Li; Qing-Jun Li; Min Zhang; Xiao-Hui Xian; Xiao-Cai Sun; Hong-Gang Zhao; Jie Qi
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Derek J Hausenloy; Peter K Mwamure; Vinod Venugopal; Joanne Harris; Matthew Barnard; Ernie Grundy; Elizabeth Ashley; Sanjeev Vichare; Carmelo Di Salvo; Shyam Kolvekar; Martin Hayward; Bruce Keogh; Raymond J MacAllister; Derek M Yellon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Why do we still not have cardioprotective drugs?

Authors:  James M Downey; Michael V Cohen
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 2.993

10.  Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ziad A Ali; Chris J Callaghan; Eric Lim; Ayyaz A Ali; S A Reza Nouraei; Asim M Akthar; Jonathan R Boyle; Kevin Varty; Rajesh K Kharbanda; David P Dutka; Michael E Gaunt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  67 in total

Review 1.  Preconditioning provides neuroprotection in models of CNS disease: paradigms and clinical significance.

Authors:  R Anne Stetler; Rehana K Leak; Yu Gan; Peiying Li; Feng Zhang; Xiaoming Hu; Zheng Jing; Jun Chen; Michael J Zigmond; Yanqin Gao
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 2.  Moving towards preconditioning for neurological disorders: are we ready for clinical trials?

Authors:  Sebastian Koch
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 3.  Ischemic conditioning-induced endogenous brain protection: Applications pre-, per- or post-stroke.

Authors:  Yuechun Wang; Cesar Reis; Richard Applegate; Gary Stier; Robert Martin; John H Zhang
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Ischemic Preconditioning: The Long-Awaited Savior of Neuroprotection. Has It Arrived?

Authors:  Magdy Selim; Michael Wang
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.620

5.  Proceedings of the 2nd translational preconditioning meeting Miami.

Authors:  Sebastian Koch; Miguel A Perez-Pinzon
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 6.  Poised for success: implementation of sound conditioning strategies to promote endogenous protective responses to stroke in patients.

Authors:  Bethann McLaughlin; Jeff M Gidday
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 7.  Clinical application of preconditioning and postconditioning to achieve neuroprotection.

Authors:  Cameron Dezfulian; Matthew Garrett; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 6.829

8.  Muscle microdialysis to confirm sublethal ischemia in the induction of remote ischemic preconditioning.

Authors:  Arzu Bilgin-Freiert; Joshua R Dusick; Nathan R Stein; Maria Etchepare; Paul Vespa; Nestor R Gonzalez
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Should the STAIR criteria be modified for preconditioning studies?

Authors:  Michael M Wang; Guohua Xi; Richard F Keep
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 10.  Hurdles to clear before clinical translation of ischemic postconditioning against stroke.

Authors:  Heng Zhao
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 6.829

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.