Literature DB >> 18258101

Protochlamydia naegleriophila as etiologic agent of pneumonia.

Nicola Casson1, Rolf Michel, Karl-Dieter Müller, John David Aubert, Gilbert Greub.   

Abstract

Using ameba coculture, we grew a Naegleria endosymbiont. Phenotypic, genetic, and phylogenetic analyses supported its affiliation as Protochlamydia naegleriophila sp. nov. We then developed a specific diagnostic PCR for Protochlamydia spp. When applied to bronchoalveolar lavages, results of this PCR were positive for 1 patient with pneumonia. Further studies are needed to assess the role of Protochlamydia spp. in pneumonia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18258101      PMCID: PMC2600176          DOI: 10.3201/eid1401.070980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


Recently, a Naegleria endosymbiont (KNic) was observed but remained uncultivable, precluding precise identification (. We grew a large amount of strain KNic by using Acanthamoeba castellanii, which enabled phenotypic, genetic and phylogenetic analyses that supported its affiliation as Protochlamydia naegleriophila. This new ameba-resistant intracellular bacteria might represent a new etiologic agent of pneumonia because it is likely also resistant to human alveolar macrophages (,). Because other Parachlamydiaceae were associated with lung infection (–), we assessed the role of Pr. naegleriophila in pneumonia by developing a diagnostic PCR and applying it to bronchoalveolar lavages.

The Study

KNic growth in A. castellanii was assessed by immunofluorescence with in-house mouse anti-KNic and Alexa488-coupled anti-immunoglobulin antibodies (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA). Confocal microscopy (LSM510; Zeiss, Feldbach, Switzerland) confirmed the intracellular location of KNic and demonstrated its rapid growth within A. castellanii. To precisely assess the growth rate, we performed PCR on A. castellanii/KNic coculture by using PrF/PrR primers and PrS probe. After 60 hours, we observed an increased number of bacteria per microliter of 4 logarithms (Appendix Figure). A. castellanii/KNic and N. lovaniensis/KNic cocultures were processed for electron microscopy as described. Ameba filled with bacteria exhibiting 3 developmental stages already described in other Parachlamydiaceae were observed (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Transmission electron microscopy of Protochlamydia naegleriophila. A) Naegleria lovaniensis trophozoite after transfer of endocytobionts; strain KNic (p) from the original host strain showing 15 coccoid bacteria distributed randomly within the cytoplasm of the host ameba. N, nucleus; en, endosome (karyosome) within the nucleus; v, empty food vacuoles. Magnification ×10,500; bar = 1 μm. B) N. lovaniensis trophozoite jammed with numerous endoparasitic stages of Pr. naegleriophila. Magnification ×16,800; bar = 1 μm. C) Enlarged detail of N. lovaniensis trophozoite with intracytoplasmic stages of Pr. naegleriophila. Some stages show binary fission indicated by the fission furrow (arrows). The endoparasites have a wrinkled gram-negative outer membrane rendering a spiny appearance to the endoparasites. Signs of damage are obvious within the cytoplasm of the host ameba. mi, mitochondria. Magnification ×43,500; bar = 0.5 μm. D) Pr. naegleriophila within vacuoles of Acanthamoebae castellanii ameba 2 days postinfection. Elementary bodies (eb) and reticulate bodies (rb) are visible. Elementary bodies harbor a smooth membrane compared with the reticulate bodies, which have a spiny shape. Magnification ×10,000; bar = 2 μm. E) Enlarged detail of A. castellanii trophozoite with intracytoplasmic stages of Pr. naegleriophila 3 days postinfection. Binary fission is observed (di). Magnification ×20,000; bar = 1 μm. F) Crescent body (arrow) within A. castellanii observed 3 days postinfection. Magnification ×20,000; bar = 1 μm.

Transmission electron microscopy of Protochlamydia naegleriophila. A) Naegleria lovaniensis trophozoite after transfer of endocytobionts; strain KNic (p) from the original host strain showing 15 coccoid bacteria distributed randomly within the cytoplasm of the host ameba. N, nucleus; en, endosome (karyosome) within the nucleus; v, empty food vacuoles. Magnification ×10,500; bar = 1 μm. B) N. lovaniensis trophozoite jammed with numerous endoparasitic stages of Pr. naegleriophila. Magnification ×16,800; bar = 1 μm. C) Enlarged detail of N. lovaniensis trophozoite with intracytoplasmic stages of Pr. naegleriophila. Some stages show binary fission indicated by the fission furrow (arrows). The endoparasites have a wrinkled gram-negative outer membrane rendering a spiny appearance to the endoparasites. Signs of damage are obvious within the cytoplasm of the host ameba. mi, mitochondria. Magnification ×43,500; bar = 0.5 μm. D) Pr. naegleriophila within vacuoles of Acanthamoebae castellanii ameba 2 days postinfection. Elementary bodies (eb) and reticulate bodies (rb) are visible. Elementary bodies harbor a smooth membrane compared with the reticulate bodies, which have a spiny shape. Magnification ×10,000; bar = 2 μm. E) Enlarged detail of A. castellanii trophozoite with intracytoplasmic stages of Pr. naegleriophila 3 days postinfection. Binary fission is observed (di). Magnification ×20,000; bar = 1 μm. F) Crescent body (arrow) within A. castellanii observed 3 days postinfection. Magnification ×20,000; bar = 1 μm. To measure the serologic differentiation index (SDI) between strain KNic and other Chlamydia-like organisms, we immunized Balb/c mice to produce anti-KNic antibodies. Purified Pr. amoebophila (ATCC PRA-7), Simkania negevensis (ATCC VR-1471), Parachlamydia acanthamoebae strain Seine, Waddlia chondrophila (ATCC 1470), Neochlamydia hartmannellae (ATCC 50802), Criblamydia sequanensis (CRIB 18), and Rhabdochlamydia crassificans (CRIB 01) antigens were tested by micro-immunofluorescence against mouse anti-KNic antibodies, whereas KNic antigen was tested with serum against all these different Chlamydia-like organisms. SDIs were calculated as described. Serum from mice immunized with KNic showed strong reactivity against autologous antigen (titers of 4,096). Significant cross-reactivity between KNic and Pr. amoebophila (SDI = 7) and P. acanthamoebae (SDI = 10) was observed. Mouse anti-KNic serum did not react with other Chlamydia-like organisms (Table 1). Because cross-reactivity between members of the order Chlamydiales was proportional to the relatedness between each species, the strong cross-reactivity between KNic and Pr. amoebophila supports the affiliation of KNic in the genus Protochlamydia.
Table 1

Antibody titers and serologic differentiation index (SDI) obtained from reciprocal cross-reactions of mouse antiserum with different Chlamydia-like organisms, as determined by immunofluorescence* www.cdc.gov/EID/content/14/1/168-T1.htm

StrainsAntigen titers (SDI)
Pr. naegleriophila Pr. amoebophila Simkania negevensis P. a. strain Seine Waddlia chondrophila Neoclamydia hartmannellae Criblamydia sequanensis R. crassificans
Pr. naegleriophila 4,096 (0)256 (7)<4 (14)512 (10)4 (20)16 (14)<4 (20)<4 (13)
Pr. amoebophila 32 (7)256 (0)<32 (5)1,024 (3)64 (10)32 (0)128 (9)64 (3)
S. negevensis 32 (14)128 (5)512 (0)64 (12)128 (12)<32 (12)512 (8)256 (3)
P. strain Seine128 (10)512 (3)32 (12)16,384 (0)64 (19)64 (12)<32 (19)<32 (12)
W. chondrophila 32 (20)128 (10)32 (12)<32 (19)32,768 (0)<32 (18)512 (13)128 (10)
N. hartmannellae 32 (14)128 (0)<32 (12)128 (12)<32 (18)2,048 (0)<32 (18)<32 (11)
C. sequanensis 32 (20)128 (9)128 (8)64 (19)256 (13)<32 (18)32,768 (0)128 (8)
R. crassificans 32 (13)128 (3)64 (3)64 (12)64 (10)<32 (11)256 (8)256 (0)

*Pr., Protochlamydia; P. a., Parachlamydia acanthamoebae; R., Rhabdochlamydia. Titers highlighted in gray, previously published in (), are provided here because these data were used to calculate SDI between Pr. naegleriophila strain KNic and the other Chlamydia-related bacteria.

*Pr., Protochlamydia; P. a., Parachlamydia acanthamoebae; R., Rhabdochlamydia. Titers highlighted in gray, previously published in (), are provided here because these data were used to calculate SDI between Pr. naegleriophila strain KNic and the other Chlamydia-related bacteria. Taxonomic position of KNic was further defined by sequencing 16Sr RNA (rrs, DQ635609) and ADP/ATP translocase (nnt, EU056171) encoding genes. The rrs was amplified/sequenced using 16SIGF/RP2Chlam primers. The nnt was amplified/sequenced using nntF2p (5′-TGT(AT)GAT(CG)CATGGCAA(AG)TTTC-3′) and nntR1p (5′-GATTT(AG)CTCAT(AG)AT(AG)TTTTG-3′) primers. Genetic and phylogenetic analyses were conducted by using MEGA software . The 1,467-bp rrs sequence showed 97.6% similarity with Pr. amoebophila, 91.8%–93.2% with other Parachlamydiaceae, and 85.7%–88.6% with other Chlamydiales. Based on the Everett genetic criteria , KNic corresponds to a new species within the Protochlamydia genus because its sequence similarity with Pr. amoebophila is >95% (same genus) and <98.5% (different species). Phylogenetic analyses of rrs gene sequences showed that KNic clustered with Pr. amoebophila, with bootstraps of 98% and 95% in neighbor-joining and minimum-evolution trees, respectively. The 569-bp nnt sequence exhibited 91.1% similarity with Pr. amoebophila, 65.5%–72.6% with other Parachlamydiaceae, and 55.4%–72.6% with other Chlamydiales. Phylogenetic analyses of nnt sequences showed that KNic clustered with Pr. amoebophila. On the basis of these analyses, we propose to name strain KNic “Protochlamydia naegleriophila.” We then developed a specific diagnostic PCR for Protochlamydia spp. Primers PrF (5′-CGGTAATACGGAGGGTGCAAG-3′) and PrR (5′-TGTTCCGAGGTTGAGCCTC-3′) as well as probe PrS (5′-TCTGACTGACACCCCCGCCTACG-3′) were selected. The 5′-Yakima-Yellow probe (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) contained locked nucleic acids (underlined in sequence above). The reactions were performed with 0.2 μM each primer, 0.1 μM probe, and iTaqSupermix (Bio-Rad, Rheinach, Switzerland). Cycling conditions were as described, and PCR products were detected with ABIPrism7000 (Applied Biosystems, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Each sample was amplified in duplicate. Inhibition, negative PCR mixture, and extraction controls were systematically tested. To allow quantification, a plasmid containing the target gene was constructed by cloning PCR products into pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Basel, Switzerland). Recombinant plasmid DNA quantified using Nanodrop ND-1000 (Witech, Littau, Switzerland) was 10-fold diluted and used as positive controls. The analytical sensitivity was 10 copy/μL (Figure 2, panel A). Intra-run variability was good (Figure 2 panel B) with a Bland-Altman bias of 0.99 and a limit of agreement of 2.87 (Figure 2, panel A). Inter-run variability was low at high concentration, 1.12, 1.71, 0.82, 1.77 cycles for 105, 104, 103, 102 copies/μL, respectively. Inter-run variability was higher at low concentration, 4.22 cycles for 101 copies/μL (Figure 2, panel A). Analytical specificity was tested with bacterial and eukaryotic DNA (Table 2). The PCR slightly amplified DNA from R. crassificans, another Chlamydia-like organism. No cross-amplification was observed with any other bacteria or with human cells. The absence of cross-amplification of P. acanthamoebae is important because this Chlamydia-related bacteria is considered an emerging agent of pneumonia (–).
Figure 2

A) Intra and inter-run reproducibility of the real-time PCR assessed on duplicate of plasmidic positive controls performed at 10-fold dilutions from 105 to 101 plasmid/μL during 6 successive runs. Standard deviations show the intra-run reproducibility of the real-time PCR. B) Plots of the cycle threshold (Ct) of first and second duplicates, showing intra-run and inter-run variability of the real-time PCR between duplicates of positive control. 95% confidence interval is shown by the dashed lines. C) Bland-Altman graph showing the difference of Ct of both duplicates according to the mean of the Ct of duplicates. The dashed line shows the 95% confidence interval (i.e., limit of agreement).

Table 2

Bacterial and eukaryotic DNA used to determine the specificity of the real-time PCR

Bacterial DNASource/strain
Bordetella pertussis Clinical specimen
Chlamydia trachomatis Clinical specimen
Chlamydophila pneumoniae ATCC VR-1310
Criblamydia sequanensis CRIB-18
Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212
Escherichia coli ATCC 35218
Gardnerella vaginalis Clinical specimen
Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 49247
Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 27736
Lactobacillus spp.Clinical specimen
Legionella pneumophila Clinical specimen
Listeria monocytogenes Clinical specimen
Moraxella catharralis Clinical specimen
Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical specimen
Neisseria lactamica Clinical specimen
Neisseria weaveri Clinical specimen
Neochlamydia hartmanella ATCC 50802
Parachlamydia acanthamoebae strain BN9ATCC VR-1476
Parachlamydia acanthamoebae strain Hall's coccusATCC VR-1476
Protochlamydia amoebophila strain UWE25ATCC PRA-7
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853
Rhabdochlamydia crassificans CRIB-01
Simkania negevensis ATCC VR-1471
Staphylococcus epidermidis Clinical specimen
Streptococcus agalactiae ATCC 13813
Streptococcus mutans Clinical specimen
Streptococcus pneumoniae Clinical specimen
Streptococcus pyogenes ATCC 19615
Waddlia chondrophila ATCC VR-1470
Eukaryotic DNASource/strain
Acanthamoebae castellanii ATCC 30010
Candida albicans
ATCC 10231
Human cellsATCC CCL-185
A) Intra and inter-run reproducibility of the real-time PCR assessed on duplicate of plasmidic positive controls performed at 10-fold dilutions from 105 to 101 plasmid/μL during 6 successive runs. Standard deviations show the intra-run reproducibility of the real-time PCR. B) Plots of the cycle threshold (Ct) of first and second duplicates, showing intra-run and inter-run variability of the real-time PCR between duplicates of positive control. 95% confidence interval is shown by the dashed lines. C) Bland-Altman graph showing the difference of Ct of both duplicates according to the mean of the Ct of duplicates. The dashed line shows the 95% confidence interval (i.e., limit of agreement). We tested 134 bronchoalveolar lavage samples from patients with (n = 65) and without (n = 69) pneumonia and extracted DNA by using a Bio-Rad Tissue Kit. One sample was positive, with 543 and 480 copies/μL. This positive result was confirmed using the 16sigF/16sigR PCR , which targets another DNA segment. This sequence exhibited 99.6% (284/285) similarity with Pr. naegleriophila strain KNic and 95.1% (269/283) with Pr. amoebophila. The presence of Protochlamydia antigen in the sample was confirmed by immunofluorescence performed using rabbit anti-KNic antibody directly on the bronchoalveolar lavage sample and by ameba coculture (Appendix Figure). The positive sample was taken from an immunocompromised patient who had cough, dyspnea, and a lung infiltrate. Bronchoscopy examination of the lower respiratory tract showed mucosal inflammation localized at the middle lung lobe. Cytology and Gram stain of the bronchoalveolar lavage showed many leucocytes with macrophages (65%) and neutrophils (23%). Although no antimicrobial treatment was administered prior to bronchoscopy, no other etiologic agent was identified despite extensive microbiologic investigations of bronchial aspirate and bronchoalveolar lavage. Results of Gram stain, auramine stain (for Mycobacterium spp.), and silver stain (for Pneumocystis carinii) tests were negative. Only physiologic oropharyngeal flora could be grown on sheep-blood and chocolate-bacitracin agars. Cell culture, as well as culture for fungi and mycobacteria, remained sterile. Moreover, results of PCRs specific for the detection of Legionella pneumophila, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae were all negative. The patient recovered and remained free of symptoms of acute lung infection during the next 20 months.

Conclusions

Isolating new species from environmental and clinical samples is important to better define their epidemiology and potential pathogenicity. We defined the taxonomic position of a novel Naegleria endosymbiont and proposed its affiliation within the Protochlamydia genus as Pr. naegleriophila sp. nov. Moreover, we developed a new PCR targeting Protochlamydia spp., applied it to clinical samples, and identified a possible role of Pr. naegleriophila as an agent of pneumonia. Protochlamydia naegleriophila (nae.gle.rio′.phi.la Gr. fem.n. Naegleria, name of host cell, Gr. adj. philos, -a friendly to, referring to intracellular growth of Protochlamydia naegleriophila strain KNic within Naegleria amebae). The 16Sr RNA sequence (DQ635609) of KNic is 97.6% similar to that of P. amoebophila, making this organism a member of the genus Protochlamydia. KNic does not grow on axenic media but grows by 4 logarithms in 60 h within A. castellanii. KNic exhibits a Chlamydia-like developmental cycle, with reticulate, elementary, and crescent bodies. The reticulate body is about 900 nm and has a spiny appearance similar to that of P. amoebophila (Figure 2, panel B). To be classified within the Pr. naegleriophila species, a new strain should show a 16Sr RNA similarity >98.5% and similar phenotypic traits.

Appendix Figure

A) Growth rate of Protochlamydia naegleriophila within Acanthamoeba castellanii assessed using a specific quantitative real-time PCR. Number of DNA copies present in culture are plotted according to time postinfection. Standard errors of the mean of duplicate experiments are shown. B) Indirect immunofluorescence preformed using rabbit anti-KNic antibody directly on the bronchoalveolar lavage showing the presence of few Pr. naegleriophila strain KNic or C) in clusters of this obligate intracellular bacteria. D) Immunofluorescence performed on amebal coculture showing the presence of Pr. naegleriophila. This strain was lost in subsequent passages.
  14 in total

1.  Development of a multiplex real-time quantitative PCR assay to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in respiratory tract secretions.

Authors:  Martine Welti; Katia Jaton; Martin Altwegg; Roland Sahli; Aline Wenger; Jacques Bille
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Koichiro Tamura; Masatoshi Nei
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 3.  Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae.

Authors:  Gilbert Greub; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Serological cross-reactivity between different Chlamydia-like organisms.

Authors:  Nicola Casson; José M Entenza; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Antigenic classification of Rickettsia felis by using monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Rong Fang; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-03

6.  Crescent bodies of Parachlamydia acanthamoeba and its life cycle within Acanthamoeba polyphaga: an electron micrograph study.

Authors:  Gilbert Greub; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Serological hint suggesting that Parachlamydiaceae are agents of pneumonia in polytraumatized intensive care patients.

Authors:  Gilbert Greub; Ioanna Boyadjiev; Bernard La Scola; Didier Raoult; Claude Martin
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Parachlamydiaceae: potential emerging pathogens.

Authors:  Gilbert Greub; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Emended description of the order Chlamydiales, proposal of Parachlamydiaceae fam. nov. and Simkaniaceae fam. nov., each containing one monotypic genus, revised taxonomy of the family Chlamydiaceae, including a new genus and five new species, and standards for the identification of organisms.

Authors:  K D Everett; R M Bush; A A Andersen
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1999-04

10.  Parachlamydiaceae as rare agents of pneumonia.

Authors:  Gilbert Greub; Pierre Berger; Laurent Papazian; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  20 in total

1.  Diversity of bacterial endosymbionts of environmental acanthamoeba isolates.

Authors:  Stephan Schmitz-Esser; Elena R Toenshoff; Susanne Haider; Eva Heinz; Verena M Hoenninger; Michael Wagner; Matthias Horn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Discovery of catalases in members of the Chlamydiales order.

Authors:  Brigida Rusconi; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Current and past strategies for bacterial culture in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Lagier; Sophie Edouard; Isabelle Pagnier; Oleg Mediannikov; Michel Drancourt; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Evolution and roles of cytokinin genes in angiosperms 2: Do ancient CKXs play housekeeping roles while non-ancient CKXs play regulatory roles?

Authors:  Xiaojing Wang; Jing Ding; Shanshan Lin; Decai Liu; Tingting Gu; Han Wu; Robert N Trigiano; Richard McAvoy; Jinling Huang; Yi Li
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.793

5.  Detection of novel Chlamydiae and Legionellales from human nasal samples of healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Daniele Corsaro; Danielle Venditti
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Evolution of the Cytokinin Dehydrogenase (CKX) Domain.

Authors:  Siarhei A Dabravolski; Stanislav V Isayenkov
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  New diagnostic real-time PCR for specific detection of Parachlamydia acanthamoebae DNA in clinical samples.

Authors:  Nicola Casson; Klara M Posfay-Barbe; Alain Gervaix; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Lawsonia intracellularis contains a gene encoding a functional rickettsia-like ATP/ADP translocase for host exploitation.

Authors:  Stephan Schmitz-Esser; Ilka Haferkamp; Silvia Knab; Thomas Penz; Michelle Ast; Christian Kohl; Michael Wagner; Matthias Horn
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Development of a real-time PCR for the specific detection of Waddlia chondrophila in clinical samples.

Authors:  G Goy; A Croxatto; K M Posfay-Barbe; A Gervaix; G Greub
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Parachlamydia and rhabdochlamydia in premature neonates.

Authors:  Frédéric Lamoth; Sébastien Aeby; Antoine Schneider; Katia Jaton-Ogay; Bernard Vaudaux; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.