Literature DB >> 18258063

Bartonella australis sp. nov. from kangaroos, Australia.

Pierre-Edouard Fournier, Carmel Taylor, Jean-Marc Rolain, Lina Barrassi, Greg Smith, Didier Raoult.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18258063      PMCID: PMC2876737          DOI: 10.3201/eid1312.060559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: During April–May 1999, 3 Bartonella isolates (AUST/NH1, AUST/NH2, AUST/NH3) were cultivated and established from the blood of 5 Macropus giganteus gray kangaroos from central coastal Queensland, Australia. We used multigene sequencing to evaluate whether these Bartonella isolates fulfill the minimum requirements for classification as a new species. DNA from each Bartonella isolate was extracted by using the QIAamp tissue kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Partial PCR amplification and sequencing of the genes encoding the 16S rDNA (rrs), citrate synthase (gltA), β-subunit of the RNA polymerase (rpoB), and cell division protein (ftsZ), as well as for the 16S–23S rDNA intergenic spacer (ITS) were attempted by using previously described primers and conditions (). Bartonella sp. isolates AUST/NH1 to AUST/NH3 exhibited identical sequences for all 4 genes and the spacer studied, and isolate AUST/NH1 was selected as type strain among kangaroo isolates. Similarity rates between strain Aust/NH1 and validated Bartonella species (Appendix Table) ranged from 84.7% to 91.6%, from 97.5% to 98.5%, from 79.6% to 87.2%, from 85.4% to 95.0%, and from 83.5% to 87.1% for the ITS and rrs, gltA, rpoB, and ftsZ genes, respectively. Therefore, for each of these 4 genes or the spacer, strain AUST/NH1 exhibited similarity rates with all other species lower than the cutoffs published to classify Bartonella isolates within a validated species (). It may thus be regarded as a new species. To estimate the genomic G+C content of strain AUST/NH1, we amplified and sequenced its ftsY gene as described () by using the BartftsyF (5′-ATGACAAAAYCYTTTATMAA-3′) and BartftsyR (5′-TCATGAGTGTCTTCCTGC-3′) primers. The ftsY G+C content was 37.7%; the calculated genomic G+C content was 39.51%. The ftsY sequence was deposited in GenBank under accession no. DQ538398. The phylogenetic relationships among the studied bartonellae were inferred from sequence alignments of each gene and from concatenated gene sequences by using the maximum parsimony and neighbor-joining methods within the MEGA version 2.1 software package () and the maximum-likelihood method within the PHYLIP software package (). Using rrs, gltA, and rpoB sequences, the phylogenetic position of strain AUST/NH1 was supported by bootstrap values <70%. In contrast, by using the ITS, ftsZ, and concatenated sequences, strain AUST/NH1 clustered with a group of B. tribocorum, B. grahamii, and B. elizabethae, with elevated bootstrap values according to the 3 analysis methods (Figure).
Figure

Unrooted dendrogram showing the phylogenetic position of Bartonella sp. strain AUST/NH1 among Bartonella species inferred from the comparison of concatenated sequences from the rrs, gltA, intergenic spacer, rpoB, and ftsZ genes by the neighbor-joining method. We included only species for which all 5 genes were available. Bootstrap values are indicated at the nodes. The scale bar indicates nucleotide sequence divergence of 0.5%.

Unrooted dendrogram showing the phylogenetic position of Bartonella sp. strain AUST/NH1 among Bartonella species inferred from the comparison of concatenated sequences from the rrs, gltA, intergenic spacer, rpoB, and ftsZ genes by the neighbor-joining method. We included only species for which all 5 genes were available. Bootstrap values are indicated at the nodes. The scale bar indicates nucleotide sequence divergence of 0.5%. The Bartonella strains we describe are the first, to our knowledge, obtained from kangaroos and, more generally, from marsupials. Before this study, the only 2 Bartonella species found in Australia were B. henselae () and B. quintana (). We demonstrated that strain AUST/NH1 was reliably associated with a well-established cluster, including the rodent-associated B. elizabethae, B. grahamii, and B. tribocorum (). Therefore, we are confident that the phylogenic position of the new Bartonella, which was similar according to 3 analysis methods and supported by high bootstrap values, is reliable. Although B. grahamii () and B. elizabethae (), members of the same phylogenetic cluster as strain AUST/NH1, cause human infections, the pathogenicity of B. tribocorum is as yet unknown. Its pathogenicity should therefore be investigated, especially for persons who come in contact with kangaroos. B. australis is a facultative intracellular gram-negative bacterium. It grows on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood at 32°C to 37°C in a moist atmosphere containing 5% CO2. A primary culture was obtained after 7 days, and subculture was obtained after 4 days under the same conditions. Colonies are homogeneous, smooth, round, and gray-white. The 3 strains tested were oxidase negative, catalase negative, and nonmotile. Pathogenicity for humans is, as yet, unknown. The type strain is strain AUST/NH1. The new species is distinguished from other Bartonella species by its 16S rRNA, gltA, rpoB, ftsZ gene sequences, as well as its 16S–23S rRNA ITS sequence. The estimated G+C content is 38%. The type strain exhibits a specific serotype () and was susceptible to amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, imipenem, erythromycin, clarithromycin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, and tetracycline (unpub. data). The type strain AUST/NH1 has been deposited in the Collection of the World Health Organization Collaborative Center for Rickettsioses, Borrelioses and Tick-borne Infections (CSUR), Marseille, France, under reference CSUR B1; in the Collection de l’Institut Pasteur (CIP) under reference CIP 108978T; and in the Culture Collection of the University of Göteborg (CCUG), Sweden, under reference CCUG 51999. The strains AUST/NH2 and AUST/NH3 have been deposited in CSUR under references CSUR B2 and CSUR B3, in the CIP under references CIP 108980 and CIP 108979, and in CCUG under references CCUG 52000 and CCUG 52001, respectively.

Appendix Table

Bartonella spp. and sequences used to validate Bartonella isolates (AUST/NH1, AUST/NH2, AUST/NH3) from 5 Macropus giganteus gray kangaroos, Australia, 1999*
  10 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis using PHYLIP.

Authors:  J D Retief
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software.

Authors:  S Kumar; K Tamura; I B Jakobsen; M Nei
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Gene-sequence-based criteria for species definition in bacteriology: the Bartonella paradigm.

Authors:  Bernard La Scola; Zaher Zeaiter; Atieh Khamis; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 17.079

4.  Estimation of prokaryote genomic DNA G+C content by sequencing universally conserved genes.

Authors:  Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Karsten Suhre; Ghislain Fournous; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Bartonella (Rochalimaea) quintana causing fever and bacteremia in an immunocompromised patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  P Rathbone; S Graves; D Miller; D Odorico; S Jones; A Hellyar; V Sinickas; A Grigg
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.306

Review 6.  Molecular phylogeny of the genus Bartonella: what is the current knowledge?

Authors:  P Houpikian; D Raoult
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Demonstration of Bartonella grahamii DNA in ocular fluids of a patient with neuroretinitis.

Authors:  F T Kerkhoff; A M Bergmans; A van Der Zee; A Rothova
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rochalimaea elizabethae sp. nov. isolated from a patient with endocarditis.

Authors:  J S Daly; M G Worthington; D J Brenner; C W Moss; D G Hollis; R S Weyant; A G Steigerwalt; R E Weaver; M I Daneshvar; S P O'Connor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Improved culture from lymph nodes of patients with cat scratch disease and genotypic characterization of Bartonella henselae isolates in Australia.

Authors:  Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Jenny Robson; Zaher Zeaiter; Rodney McDougall; Shane Byrne; Didier Raoult
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Microarray for serotyping of Bartonella species.

Authors:  Cyrille J Bonhomme; Claude Nappez; Didier Raoult
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 3.605

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  An immunocompromised murine model of chronic Bartonella infection.

Authors:  Lucius Chiaraviglio; Scott Duong; Daniel A Brown; Richard J Birtles; James E Kirby
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Evidence of transfer by conjugation of type IV secretion system genes between Bartonella species and Rhizobium radiobacter in amoeba.

Authors:  Watcharee Saisongkorh; Catherine Robert; Bernard La Scola; Didier Raoult; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Is there a Lyme-like disease in Australia? Summary of the findings to date.

Authors:  Melissa Judith Chalada; John Stenos; Richard Stewart Bradbury
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2016-04-07

4.  Identification of novel Bartonella spp. in bats and evidence of Asian gray shrew as a new potential reservoir of Bartonella.

Authors:  Jen-Wei Lin; Yuan-Man Hsu; Bruno B Chomel; Liang-Kong Lin; Jai-Chyi Pei; Sheng-Hai Wu; Chao-Chin Chang
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 5.  Emerging rodent-associated Bartonella: a threat for human health?

Authors:  Maria Krügel; Nina Król; Volkhard A J Kempf; Martin Pfeffer; Anna Obiegala
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  First Report of Bartonella spp. in Marsupials from Brazil, with a Description of Bartonella harrusi sp. nov. and a New Proposal for the Taxonomic Reclassification of Species of the Genus Bartonella.

Authors:  Renan Bressianini do Amaral; Marita Vedovelli Cardozo; Alessandro de Mello Varani; Maria Eduarda Chiaradia Furquim; Clara Morato Dias; William Oliveira de Assis; Alanderson Rodrigues da Silva; Heitor Miraglia Herrera; Rosangela Zacarias Machado; Marcos Rogério André
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-08-09

7.  Molecular detection of Bartonella species in rodents from the Lao PDR.

Authors:  E Angelakis; K Khamphoukeo; D Grice; P N Newton; V Roux; K Aplin; D Raoult; J M Rolain
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  A gene transfer agent and a dynamic repertoire of secretion systems hold the keys to the explosive radiation of the emerging pathogen Bartonella.

Authors:  Lionel Guy; Björn Nystedt; Christina Toft; Katarzyna Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka; Eva C Berglund; Fredrik Granberg; Kristina Näslund; Ann-Sofie Eriksson; Siv G E Andersson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Horizontal transfers and gene losses in the phospholipid pathway of bartonella reveal clues about early ecological niches.

Authors:  Qiyun Zhu; Michael Kosoy; Kevin J Olival; Katharina Dittmar
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.416

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.