Literature DB >> 18256926

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 and estrogen receptor expression, a demonstration project using the residual tissue repository of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.

W F Anderson1, S Luo, N Chatterjee, P S Rosenberg, R K Matsuno, M T Goodman, B Y Hernandez, M Reichman, M P Dolled-Filhart, R M O'Regan, M Garcia-Closas, C M Perou, I Jatoi, R W Cartun, M E Sherman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2001, the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program established Residual Tissue Repositories (RTR) in the Hawaii, Iowa, and Los Angeles Tumor Registries to collect discarded tissue blocks from pathologic laboratories within their catchment areas. To validate the utility of the RTR for supplementing SEER's central database, we assessed human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) and estrogen receptor expression (ER) in a demonstration project. MATERIALS: Using a prepared set of tissue microarrays (TMAs) residing in the Hawaii Tumor Registry (HTR), we performed standard immunohistochemistry. Breast cancers in the TMA were diagnosed in 1995, followed through 2006, and linked to SEER's main database.
RESULTS: The TMA included 354 cases, representing 51% of 687 breast cancers in the HTR (1995). The HTR and TMA cases were similar with respect to patient demographics and tumor characteristics. Seventy-six percent (76%, 268 of 354) of TMA cases were HER2+ and/or ER+, i.e., 28 HER2+ER-, 12 HER2+ER+, and 228 HER2-ER+. There were 67 HER2-ER- cases and 19 were unclassified. Age distributions at diagnosis were bimodal with dominant early-onset modes for HER2+ER- tumors and dominant late-onset modes for HER2-ER+ breast cancers. Epidemiologic patterns for concordant HER2+ER+ (double-positive) and HER2-ER- (double-negative) were intermediate to discordant HER2+ER- and HER2-ER+.
CONCLUSION: Results showed contrasting incidence patterns for HER2+ (HER2+ER-) and ER+ (HER2-ER+) breast cancers, diagnosed in 1995. Though sample sizes were small, this demonstration project validates the potential utility of the RTR for supplementing the SEER program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18256926      PMCID: PMC2676874          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-9918-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  26 in total

1.  Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Chad A Livasy; Lynn G Dressler; David Cowan; Kathleen Conway; Gamze Karaca; Melissa A Troester; Chiu Kit Tse; Sharon Edmiston; Sandra L Deming; Joseph Geradts; Maggie C U Cheang; Torsten O Nielsen; Patricia G Moorman; H Shelton Earp; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Co-expression of steroid receptors (estrogen receptor alpha and/or progesterone receptors) and Her-2/neu: Clinical implications.

Authors:  Daniel R Ciocca; Francisco E Gago; Mariel A Fanelli; Stuart K Calderwood
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 4.292

3.  Differences in risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypes in a population-based study.

Authors:  Xiaohong R Yang; Mark E Sherman; David L Rimm; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Stephen M Hewitt; William F Anderson; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Alicja Bardin-Mikolajczak; Witold Zatonski; Richard Cartun; Daniza Mandich; Grzegorz Rymkiewicz; Marcin Ligaj; Stanislaw Lukaszek; Radzisaw Kordek; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Comparison of age distribution patterns for different histopathologic types of breast carcinoma.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Graça M Dores; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry.

Authors:  Katrina R Bauer; Monica Brown; Rosemary D Cress; Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Predicting the HER2 status of breast cancer from basic histopathology data: an analysis of 1500 breast cancers as part of the HER2000 International Study.

Authors:  M Bilous; C Ades; J Armes; J Bishop; R Brown; B Cooke; M Cummings; G Farshid; A Field; A Morey; P McKenzie; W Raymond; P Robbins; L Tan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  HER-2 testing in breast cancer using parallel tissue-based methods.

Authors:  Hadi Yaziji; Lynn C Goldstein; Todd S Barry; Robert Werling; Harry Hwang; Georgiana K Ellis; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Allen M Gown
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Variation in breast cancer hormone receptor and HER2 levels by etiologic factors: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Mark E Sherman; David L Rimm; Xiaohong R Yang; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Beata Peplonska; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Witold Zatonski; Richard Cartun; Daniza Mandich; Grzegorz Rymkiewicz; Marcin Ligaj; Stanisław Lukaszek; Radzislaw Kordek; Zynep Kalaylioglu; Malini Harigopal; Lori Charrette; Roni T Falk; Douglas Richesson; William F Anderson; Stephen M Hewitt; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Gene expression profiling and histopathological characterization of triple-negative/basal-like breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Bas Kreike; Marieke van Kouwenhove; Hugo Horlings; Britta Weigelt; Hans Peterse; Harry Bartelink; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  29 in total

1.  The potential of digital microscopy in breast pathology.

Authors:  T Krenacs; I Zsakovics; Cs Diczhazi; L Ficsor; V S Varga; B Molnar
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Qualitative age interactions in breast cancer studies: mind the gap.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Ismail Jatoi; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  MDM2, MDM2-C, and mutant p53 expression influence breast cancer survival in a multiethnic population.

Authors:  Lenora W M Loo; Chong Gao; Yurii B Shvetsov; Danielle R Okoro; Brenda Y Hernandez; Jill Bargonetti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Prevalence and prognostic role of triple-negative breast cancer by race: a surveillance study.

Authors:  Helen Swede; David I Gregorio; Susan H Tannenbaum; Jessica A Brockmeyer; Christine Ambrosone; Lori L Wilson; Mellisa A Pensa; Lou Gonsalves; Richard G Stevens; Carolyn D Runowicz
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  How many etiological subtypes of breast cancer: two, three, four, or more?

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Aleix Prat; Charles M Perou; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Tracking and evaluating molecular tumor markers with cancer registry data: HER2 and breast cancer.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status.

Authors:  Nadia Howlader; Sean F Altekruse; Christopher I Li; Vivien W Chen; Christina A Clarke; Lynn A G Ries; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Soy consumption and histopathologic markers in breast tissue using tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Eva Erber; Martijn Verheus; Brenda Y Hernandez; Jeffrey Killeen; Suzanne Cashin; J Mark Cline
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 9.  New insights on PI3K/AKT pathway alterations and clinical outcomes in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sherry X Yang; Eric Polley; Stanley Lipkowitz
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Mammographic density and epithelial histopathologic markers.

Authors:  Martijn Verheus; Gertraud Maskarinec; Eva Erber; Jana S Steude; Jeffrey Killeen; Brenda Y Hernandez; J Mark Cline
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.