Literature DB >> 18254099

Ischaemic preconditioning for liver transplantation.

K S Gurusamy1, Y Kumar, D Sharma, B R Davidson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ischaemic preconditioning is a mechanism for reducing organ ischaemia reperfusion injury by a brief period of organ ischaemia.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the advantages and disadvantages of ischaemic preconditioning during donor hepatectomy for liver transplant recipients. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until March 2007. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised clinical trials comparing ischaemic preconditioning versus no ischaemic preconditioning during donor liver retrievals performed in humans in this review (irrespective of language or publication status). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We collected the data on the characteristics of the trial, methodological quality of the trials, mortality, initial poor function, primary graft non-function, re-transplantation, liver function tests, markers of neutrophil activation, apoptosis, and intensive therapy unit stay. We analysed the data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models. For each binary outcome we calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on intention-to-treat analysis. For continuous outcomes, we calculated the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. MAIN
RESULTS: In three trials, 162 cadaveric liver donor retrievals were randomised; 78 to ischaemic preconditioning and 84 to no ischaemic preconditioning. In one trial, 15 living donor liver retrievals were randomised; 10 to ischaemic preconditioning and 5 to no ischaemic preconditioning. Three of the four trials were of low-risk bias. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality, initial poor function, primary graft non-function, or re-transplant. There was no statistically significant difference in the transaminase activity, bilirubin level, prothrombin activity, median myeloperoxidase activity, median cluster of differentiation eight (CD8) expression, median inducible nitrogen oxide synthetase, or apoptosis. There was also no significant difference in the median intensive therapy unit stay of the recipients. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence to support or refute the use of ischaemic preconditioning in donor liver retrievals. Further studies are necessary to identify the optimal ischaemic preconditioning stimulus. Further randomised clinical trials are necessary to evaluate the role of ischaemic preconditioning in donor liver retrievals involving a period of warm reperfusion, following ischaemic preconditioning during donor liver retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18254099      PMCID: PMC8988153          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006315.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  26 in total

1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses.

Authors:  L L Kjaergard; J Villumsen; C Gluud
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches.

Authors:  Pamela Royle; Ruairidh Milne
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

6.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

Authors:  K F Schulz; I Chalmers; R J Hayes; D G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Ischemic preconditioning in deceased donor liver transplantation: a prospective randomized clinical trial of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Baburao Koneru; Adrian Fisher; Yan He; Kenneth M Klein; Joan Skurnick; Dorian J Wilson; Andrew N de la Torre; Anand Merchant; Rakesh Arora; Arun K Samanta
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 8.  A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease.

Authors:  P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 9.  Protection of the liver by ischemic preconditioning: a review of mechanisms and clinical applications.

Authors:  Rahul S Koti; Alexander M Seifalian; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2003-07-02       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 10.  Ischaemic preconditioning for liver transplantation.

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; Y Kumar; D Sharma; B R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Post reperfusion syndrome during liver transplantation: From pathophysiology to therapy and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Antonio Siniscalchi; Lorenzo Gamberini; Cristiana Laici; Tommaso Bardi; Giorgio Ercolani; Laura Lorenzini; Stefano Faenza
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Current protective strategies in liver surgery.

Authors:  Kurinchi S Gurusamy; Hector D Gonzalez; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Heme oxygenase system in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  James A Richards; Stephen J Wigmore; Luke R Devey
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Redox therapeutics in hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Rakesh P Patel; John D Lang; Alvin B Smith; Jack H Crawford
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-01-27

Review 5.  Impact of ischaemic preconditioning on experimental steatotic livers following hepatic ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael J J Chu; Ryash Vather; Anthony J R Hickey; Anthony R J Phillips; Adam S J R Bartlett
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Clamping techniques and protecting strategies in liver surgery.

Authors:  Mickael Lesurtel; Kuno Lehmann; Olivier de Rougemont; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 7.  Role of ischemic preconditioning in liver surgery and hepatic transplantation.

Authors:  Eduardo E Montalvo-Jave; Enrique Piña; Cesar Montalvo-Arenas; Raúl Urrutia; Luis Benavente-Chenhalls; Julieta Peña-Sanchez; David A Geller
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Post-liver transplant hepatitis C virus recurrence: an unresolved thorny problem.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Giorgio Ballardini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Key Considerations Before and After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Yuval A Patel; Carl L Berg; Cynthia A Moylan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 10.  Ischaemic preconditioning for liver transplantation.

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; Y Kumar; D Sharma; B R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.