| Literature DB >> 18253492 |
Takashi Hiroyama1, Kenichi Miharada, Kazuhiro Sudo, Inaho Danjo, Naoko Aoki, Yukio Nakamura.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The supply of transfusable red blood cells (RBCs) is not sufficient in many countries. If erythroid cell lines able to produce transfusable RBCs in vitro were established, they would be valuable resources. However, such cell lines have not been established. To evaluate the feasibility of establishing useful erythroid cell lines, we attempted to establish such cell lines from mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18253492 PMCID: PMC2212133 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Culture protocol.
| Phase | Culture period | Feeder cells | Attached cells | Detached cells | Specific factors used |
| I | Day 0 | OP9 cells | (Start) | (Start) | VEGF, IGF-II |
| II | Day 4 | Change to new cells | Discarded | Re-cultured | SCF, EPO, IL-3, Dex |
| II | Day 7 | No change | Remained | Re-cultured | SCF, EPO, IL-3, Dex |
| II | Day 10∼ | Change or No change | Remained or Discarded | Re-cultured | SCF, EPO, IL-3, Dex |
| III | Day 60∼ | (-) | (-) | Re-cultured | SCF, EPO, IL-3, Dex |
| IV | Day 120∼ | (-) | (-) | Re-cultured | Essential factors |
To induce hematopoiesis, 5×105 ES cells were cultured on feeder cells with cytokines in two 100 mm-dishes, with 2.5×105 ES cells per dish. Phase I∼IV, four different phases of culture. Attached cells and Detached cells, the cells derived from ES cells and attached to feeder cells or detached from feeder cells. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. IGF-II, insulin-like growth factor-II. SCF, stem cell factor. EPO, erythropoietin. IL-3, interleukin-3. Dex, dexamethasone.
a, the attached cells were discarded together with the used feeder cells. b, the detached cells collected from two dishes were cultured again on new OP9 cells in a 100 mm-dish. c, the attached cells were cultured further without any treatment. d, all detached cells collected from a dish were cultured again. e, medium changes were performed twice a week. f, when the attached cells reached approximately 80% confluence, feeder cells were changed to new OP9 cells. g, when the feeder cells were changed to new cells, the attached cells were discarded together with the used feeder cells. h, all detached cells collected from a dish were cultured again, or a portion of detached cells were cultured again and other detached cells were subjected to analyses or discarded. i, approximately as of Day 60 we started to try the culture in the absence of feeder cells using a portion of the detached cells, simultaneously continuing the culture in the presence of feeder cells as the Phase II culture. j, no feeder cells were used in the Phase III and IV culture. k, the cells attached to the dish were barely detected. l, approximately as of Day 120 the essential factor(s) for proliferation was evaluated, and then each cell line was cultured in the presence of the essential factor(s) alone.
The number of trials to establish cell lines and the number of established cell lines.
| Method A | |||
| Name of ES cell line | Number of trial | Number of established cell line | Designation |
| E14TG2a | 10 | 1 | MEDEP-E14 |
| D3 | 3 | 0 | |
| TT2 | 3 | 0 | |
| BRC4 | 7 | 0 | |
| BRC5 | 10 | 1 | MEDEP-BRC5 |
| BRC6 | 6 | 1 | MEDMC-BRC6 |
| BRC7 | 6 | 0 | |
| NTES2 | 6 | 1 | MEDMC-NT2 |
| Method B | |||
| Name of ES cell line | Number of trial | Number of established cell line | Designation |
| BRC4 | 4 | 1 | MEDEP-BRC4 |
| BRC5 | 2 | 0 | |
| BRC6 | 4 | 0 | |
| BRC7 | 2 | 0 | |
Method A, the method described in Table 1. Method B, the use of IL-3 was excluded from Method A through all procedures.
Figure 1Characteristics of erythroid cell lines derived from mouse ES cells, MEDEP.
(A) Morphology of two erythroid cell lines, MEDEP-E14 and MEDEP-BRC5. Wright-Giemsa staining. (B) Cytokine dependent proliferation. Cells (1×105 cells/ml) were cultured in various conditions for three days. The added factor(s) is shown at the bottom. None, no specific factor. SCF, stem cell factor. EPO, erythropoietin. Broken line, the number of cells at the start of culture. Values are mean±S.D. Results shown are representative of several independent experiments performed at different time points after establishment of the cell lines. (C) RT-PCR analyses. Oct-3/4 and Nanog, transcription factors specific for ES cells. GATA-1 and EKLF (Erythroid Krüppel-like factor), transcription factors specific for erythroid cells. EPOR, erythropoietin receptor. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. NC, negative control without cDNA. Day 0, E14TG2a cells before differentiation. Day 4, 7, 10, 14 and 21, the cells following induction of differentiation into hematopoietic cells from E14TG2a by the method described in Table 1 (Method A). The cycle numbers performed in each PCR are shown at the right. Results shown are representative of two independent experiments.
Figure 2In vitro differentiation of MEDEP.
The in vitro differentiation of MEDEP-E14 was performed by culture for two days after deprivation of erythropoietin (EPO). The in vitro differentiation of MEDEP-BRC5 was performed by culture for three days after deprivation of stem cell factor (SCF) and addition of EPO. (A) Flow cytometric analyses. Control, results with isotype controls. Before and After, the cells before and after in vitro differentiation. CD71, transferrin receptor. c-Kit, receptor for SCF. TER119, a cell surface antigen specific for mature erythroid cells. (B) Cell pellets before and after in vitro differentiation. The method for in vitro differentiation of MEDEP-BRC4 is described in Figure S4. (C) Morphology of the cells after in vitro differentiation. Arrows indicate enucleated red blood cells. (A–C) Results shown are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 3In vivo proliferation and differentiation of MEDEP.
A transformant of MEDEP-E14 expressing Venus as a marker was established, MEDEP-E14-Venus. (A) The in vitro differentiation of MEDEP-E14-Venus was performed by culture for two days after deprivation of erythropoietin. Control, results with isotype controls. Before and After, the cells before and after in vitro differentiation. (B) In vivo differentiation of MEDEP-E14-Venus cells. Acute anemia was induced in an immuno-deficient mouse (NOD-SCID) and the next day MEDEP-E14-Venus cells (2×107 cells/mouse) were transplanted into the anemic mouse. Three days after cell transplantation, bone marrow and spleen cells were subjected to flow cytometric analyses. Control mouse, NOD-SCID mouse without cell transplantation. The vast majority of Venus-positive cells in the spleen show differentiation into CD71+TER119+ mature erythroid cells. (A, B) CD71 and TER119, see legend of Figure 2A. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments. (C) In vivo proliferation of MEDEP-E14-Venus cells. Cell transplantation was performed as in (B). We determined the proportion (%) of Venus-positive cells and calculated the absolute number of Venus-positive cells in the spleen. Day 1 and Day 3, one day and three days following cell transplantation, respectively. Values are mean±S.D. (N = 3).
Figure 4Amelioration of anemia by transplantation of MEDEP.
(A) MEDEP-E14 cells (2×107 cells/mouse) were transplanted into an immuno-deficient mouse (NOD-SCID) 24 hours after the induction of hemolysis by phenylhydrazine (60 mg/kg body weight) injection. Day 5 and Day 26, five and twenty-six days after cell transplantation. RBC, red blood cell. White bars (n = 10) and black bars (n = 14), the data obtained from the mice transplanted with control cells and MEDEP-E14 cells, respectively. Values are mean±S.D. * p<0.01 (by the Student's t-test) (B) Increased survival of mice transplanted with MEDEP cells following induction of severe acute anemia. MEDEP-E14 cells (2×107 cells/mouse) were transplanted into an NOD-SCID mouse 24 hours following the first induction of hemolysis by phenylhydrazine (60 mg/kg body weight) injection. Five days following the cell transplantation, the second induction of hemolysis by phenylhydrazine (80 mg/kg body weight) injection was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test. (A, B) Control cell, mast cell line derived from mouse ES cells (MEDMC-NT2) (Figures S1 and S2). MEDMC-NT2 cells (2×107 cells/mouse) were transplanted similarly as a control experiment.
Blood count after induction of acute anemia and cell transplantation.
| RBC | Hb | Ht | MCV | MCH | MCHC | WBC | Platelet | |
| Experiment A | ||||||||
| Day 5 | ||||||||
| MEDEP-E14-Venus (N = 3) | 502.0±30.4 | 14.1±0.7 | 36.7±1.0 | 73.3±3.9 | 28.1±0.6 | 38.4±1.3 | 680.3±86.1 | 97.1±14.6 |
| MEDMC-NT2 (N = 3) | 401.0±11.4 | 10.8±0.3 | 29.2±0.8 | 72.8±0.6 | 26.9±0.2 | 37.0±0.5 | 783.3±53.2 | 98.0±3.7 |
| Day 26 | ||||||||
| MEDEP-E14-Venus (N = 3) | 761.3±31.0 | 15.0±0.3 | 41.7±1.2 | 54.7±0.7 | 19.7±0.3 | 36.0±0.3 | 17.0±1.7 | 118.7±11.6 |
| MEDMC-NT2 (N = 3) | 772.0±25.3 | 15.1±0.5 | 41.4±1.8 | 53.7±0.3 | 19.5±0.3 | 36.5±0.3 | 12.7±5.7 | 124.3±9.3 |
| Experiment B | ||||||||
| Day 5 | ||||||||
| MEDEP-BRC5 (N = 10) | 562.7±22.4 | 13.0±1.1 | 34.7±1.4 | 61.6±1.2 | 23.0±1.1 | 37.4±1.7 | 150.7±36.1 | 75.5±8.0 |
| MEDMC-BRC6 (N = 10) | 506.9±31.7 | 12.1±0.7 | 32.3±1.5 | 63.8±2.5 | 23.8±1.2 | 37.4±2.5 | 216.4±100.5 | 86.1±19.2 |
| Day 26 | ||||||||
| MEDEP-BRC5 (N = 10) | 933.5±34.4 | 14.9±1.2 | 49.0±2.3 | 52.5±1.5 | 15.9±1.0 | 30.4±1.3 | 72.5±17.3 | 95.1±6.9 |
| MEDMC-BRC6 (N = 10) | 922.7±26.1 | 14.8±1.0 | 48.7±1.2 | 52.8±1.2 | 16.0±1.0 | 30.3±1.4 | 78.3±17.7 | 105.0±10.3 |
Experiment A, MEDEP-E14-Venus and MEDMC-NT2 (2×107 cells/mouse) were transplanted into immuno-deficient mice (NOD-SCID) 24 hours following the induction of hemolysis by phenylhydrazine (60 mg/kg body weight) injection. Experiment B, MEDEP-BRC5 and MEDMC-BRC6 (2×107 cells/mouse) were transplanted into C57BL/6 mice 24 hours following the induction of hemolysis by phenylhydrazine (80 mg/kg body weight) injection. Day 5 and Day 26, five and twenty-six days after cell transplantation. RBC, red blood cell, ×104/µl. Hb, hemoglobin, g/dl. Ht, hematocrit, %. MCV, mean corpuscular volume, fl. MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, pg. MCHC, MCH concentration, g/dl. WBC, white blood cell, ×102/µl. Platelet, ×104/µl.
p<0.01 (by the Student's t-test)