| Literature DB >> 18253468 |
Claudia Perez-Cruz1, Jeanine I H Müller-Keuker, Urs Heilbronner, Eberhard Fuchs, Gabriele Flügge.
Abstract
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays an important role in the stress response. We filled pyramidal neurons in PFC layer III with neurobiotin and analyzed dendrites in rats submitted to chronic restraint stress and in controls. In the right prelimbic cortex (PL) of controls, apical and distal dendrites were longer than in the left PL. Stress reduced the total length of apical dendrites in right PL and abolished the hemispheric difference. In right infralimbic cortex (IL) of controls, proximal apical dendrites were longer than in left IL, and stress eliminated this hemispheric difference. No hemispheric difference was detected in anterior cingulate cortex (ACx) of controls, but stress reduced apical dendritic length in left ACx. These data demonstrate interhemispheric differences in the morphology of pyramidal neurons in PL and IL of control rats and selective effects of stress on the right hemisphere. In contrast, stress reduced dendritic length in the left ACx.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18253468 PMCID: PMC1975761 DOI: 10.1155/2007/46276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1Boundaries of the PFC subareas in the rat visualized with antibodies. In the anterior PFC (3.70 − 2.20 mm from bregma), three subareas can be distinguished: IL, PL, and ACx. Pictures in the lower panels show the same sections at higher magnification. (a) Staining with the SMI-32 antibody shows the border between PL and ACx, and between ACx and premotor cortex (FR). (b) Parvalbumin (PV) is a good marker to distinguish IL from PL. The PV antibody stains neurons in layer V and in the other cortical layers in all three subareas. (c) The NeuN antibody strongly labels layer II, and also layers I–V can be easily distinguished with this antibody. (d) With Nissl staining, it is possible to distinguish layer I but not the other cortical layers. Scale bars: 500 μm.
Figure 2Example of an intracellularly labeled and reconstructed pyramidal neuron in the PFC of a control rat. (a) Photomicrograph of an intracellularly labeled pyramidal neuron in layer III of the prelimbic subarea (left hemisphere). (b) Line drawing of the neuron shown in (a) (reconstruction with NeuroLucida). The relative position of the pyramidal cell is shown by lines indicating the cortical layers (I–V). Scale bar: 100 μm.
Figure 3Sholl analysis of dendrites on pyramidal cells in the left (open circles) and the right hemisphere (closed circles) of controls (left panel) and stressed rats (right panel). Basilar dendrites are plotted to the left and apical dendrites to the right as a function of the distance from the soma center (0). The schematic drawing in the top panel illustrates the Sholl circles that correspond to the distances from soma depicted in (a) infralimbic, (b) prelimbic, and (c) anterior cingulate. Data points represent the sum of all dendrites detected at the respective distance (radius) from the soma center set as zero (mean ± SEM). Symbols indicate significant differences within each 10 μm ring determined by ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc test (∗P < .05, #P < .01).
Total length (sum of all dendrites, μm) of basilar and apical dendrites on pyramidal neurons in the three PFC subareas of control and stressed rats. Hemispheric asymmetry refers to the dendritic length in the right compared to the left hemisphere (expressed as percentage). In the PL, chronic restraint stress reduced apical dendritic length exclusively in the right hemisphere (mean ± SEM). n is the number of animals from which data were derived.
| Control | Stress | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total dendritic length ( | Hemispheric | Total dendritic length ( | Hemispheric | ||||
| asymmetry | asymmetry | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| L | R | R as % of L | L | R | R as % of L | ||
|
| |||||||
| Basilar dendrites | IL | 2928 ± 433 | 2471 ± 400 | 84% | 2671 ± 441 | 2530 ± 463 | 95% |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| PL | 2779 ± 135 | 2402 ± 333 | 86% | 2742 ± 416 | 2257 ± 217 | 82% | |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| ACx | 3364 ± 406 | 3220 ± 564 | 96% | 2811 ± 442 | 2265 ± 281 | 81% | |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||||
| Apical dendrites | IL | 2261 ± 295 | 2514 ± 383 | 111% | 2204 ± 301 | 2880 ± 412 | 131% |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| PL | 2066 ± 186 | 3289 ± 625 | 159% | 2397 ± 444 | 1957 ± 170 | 82% | |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| ACx | 2339 ± 212 | 2618 ± 283 | 112% | 1956 ± 416 | 2269 ± 408 | 116% | |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
*P < .05 significant difference to control as determined by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc test. IL, infralimbic cortex; PL, prelimbic cortex; ACx, anterior cingulate cortex; L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere.
Number of branching points and branches in basilar and apical dendrites on pyramidal neurons in PFC subareas.
| Control | Stress | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| IL | PL | ACx | IL | PL | ACx | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Basilar dendrites | Total number of branching points | L | 17.3 ± 2.7 (9) | 13.8 ± 0.7 (5) | 18.8 ± 2.9 (9) | 13.3 ± 1.7 (9) | 13.4 ± 1.5 (11) | 15.3 ± 2.1 (7) |
| R | 11.5 ± 1.3 (7) | 13.1 ± 1.2 (5) | 16.7 ± 2.0 (9) | 11.7 ± 1.7 (9) | 12.5 ± 1.0 (12) | 13.3 ± 2.3 (7) | ||
| Total number of branches | L | 40.6 ± 5.6 (9) | 35.3 ± 1.7 (5) | 44.6 ± 6.2 (9) | 32.2 ± 4.1 (9) | 30.3 ± 3.7 (11) | 37.7 ± 4.1 (7) | |
| R | 30.5 ± 2.6 (7) | 32.8 ± 2.7 (5) | 41.3 ± 4.2 (9) | 30.4 ± 3.9 (9) | 31.9 ± 2.2 (12) | 32.9 ± 4.9 (7) | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Apical dendrites | Total number of branching points | L | 12.4 ± 1.5 (9) | 11.7 ± 0.8 (5) | 13.0 ± 1.5 (9) | 11.0 ± 2.3 (9) | 11.6 ± 2.0 (11) | 11.0 ± 2.3 (7) |
| R | 15.1 ± 2.4 (7) | 17.3 ± 2.9 (5) | 14.7 ± 1.6 (9) | 13.6 ± 2.9 (9) |
| 13.6 ± 2.9 (7) | ||
| Total number of branches | L | 25.1 ± 2.7 (9) | 24.5 ± 1.8 (5) | 27.0 ± 2.9 (9) | 23.3 ± 4.8 (9) | 25.1 ± 4.1 (11) | 23.3 ± 4.8 (7) | |
| R | 31.4 ± 4.9 (7) | 36.1 ± 5.9 (5) | 30.8 ± 3.2 (9) | 28.4 ± 5.8 (9) | 22.8 ± 1.7 (12) | 28.4 ± 5.8 (7) | ||
| Number of branches (order 3) | L | 2.9 ± 0.3 (9) | 2.9 ± 0.4 (5) | 3.1 ± 0.4 (6) | 2.8 ± 0.4 (7) | 3.3 ± 0.3 (9) | 2.3 ± 0.3 (6) | |
| R | 2.8 ± 0.4 (6) | 4.0 ± 0.2 (5) | 2.4 ± 0.2 (5) | 2.5 ± 0.3 (7) |
|
| ||
| Number of branches (order 4) | L | 2.9 ± 0.3 (9) | 2.7 ± 0.3 (5) | 3.1 ± 0.4 (6) | 2.9 ± 0.4 (7) | 3.7 ± 0.6 (9) | 2.7 ± 0.4 (6) | |
| R |
| 3.1 ± 0.4 (5) | 4.0 ± 0.5 (5) | 3.5 ± 0.3 (7) | 3.3 ± 0.4 (8) | 3.7 ± 0.8 (7) | ||
| Number of branches (order 5) | L | 3.8 ± 0.3 (9) | 2.5 ± 0.4 (5) | 3.3 ± 0.3 (6) | 3.7 ± 0.6 (7) | 4.1 ± 0.8 (8) | 3.2 ± 0.7 (5) | |
| R | 3.1 ± 0.4 (6) | 3.6 ± 0.2 (5) | 3.8 ± 0.5 (5) | 3.6 ± 0.5 (7) | 3.1 ± 0.3 (8) | 3.0 ± 0.4 (7) | ||
| Number of branches (order 6) | L | 4.2 ± 0.6 (9) | 2.8 ± 0.3 (5) | 3.8 ± 0.8 (6) | 4.0 ± 0.6 (7) | 5.6 ± 1.0 (8) | 2.5 ± 0.5 (5) | |
| R |
| 4.6 ± 1.2 (5) | 4.2 ± 1.2 (5) | 3.6 ± 0.3 (7) | 3.0 ± 0.3 (8) | 3.7 ± 1.0 (7) | ||
| Number of branches (order 11) | L | 0 ± 0 (0) | 2.2 ± 0.9 (3) | 0 ± 0 (0) | 0 ± 0 (0) | 3.1 ± 0.7 (3) | 3.3 ± 0.7 (3) | |
| R |
| 2.5 ± 0.8 (3) | 2.0 ± 1.1 (3) | 3.3 ± 0.8 (3) | 3.0 ± 1.0 (3) |
| ||
| Number of branches (order 12) | L | 0 ± 0 (0) | 0 ± 0 (0) | 0 ± 0 (0) | 0 ± 0 (0) | 0 ± 0 (0) | 0 ± 0 (0) | |
| R |
| 0 ± 0 (0) | 0 ± 0 (0) |
| 0 ± 0 (0) | 0 ± 0 (0) | ||
*P < .05, **P < .01 significant differences between right (R) and left (L); # P < .05, ## P < .01 significant difference to control as determined by ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc test. Numbers in parentheses indicate number of animals from which data (means ± SEM) were derived (n). Abbreviations: IL, infralimbic cortex; PL, prelimbic cortex; ACx, anterior cingulate cortex.
Figure 4Comparisons of apical dendrites in the right hemispheres of IL and PL, and in the left ACx of stressed (closed circles) and control rats (open circles). Apical dendrites were plotted as a function of distance from the soma center (0). (a) and (b) show the effects of stress in the right hemisphere of the infralimbic and prelimbic, respectively. (c) show the effects of stress on the left hemisphere of the anterior cingulate. Data points represent the sum of all dendrites detected at the respective distance (radius) from the soma (mean ± SEM). Symbols indicate significant differences detected within each 10 μm ring as determined by three-way repeated measures ANOVA (∗P < .05, #P < .01).