R R Kipping1, C Payne, D A Lawlor. 1. Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol, BS8 2PR, UK. rrkipping@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a school obesity prevention project developed in the United States can be adapted for use in England. METHODS: A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial and interviews with teachers were carried out in 19 primary schools in South West England. Participants included 679 children in year 5 (age 9-10). Baseline and follow-up assessments were completed for 323 children (screen viewing) and 472 children (body mass index). Sixteen lessons on healthy eating, physical activity and reducing TV viewing were taught over 5 months by teachers. Main outcome measures were hours of screen activities, body mass index, mode of transport to school and teachers' views of the intervention. RESULTS: Children from intervention schools spent less time on screen-viewing activities after the intervention but these differences were imprecisely estimated: mean difference in minutes spent on screen viewing at the end of the intervention (intervention schools minus control schools) adjusted for baseline levels and clustering within schools was -11.6 (95% CI -42.7 to 19.4) for a week day and was -15.4 (95% CI -57.5 to 26.8) for a Saturday. There was no difference in mean body mass index or the odds of obesity. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to transfer this US school-based intervention to UK schools, and it may be effective in reducing the time children spend on screen-based activities. The study has provided information for a full-scale trial, which would require 50 schools ( approximately 1250 pupils) to detect effects on screen viewing and body mass index over 2 years of follow-up.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a school obesity prevention project developed in the United States can be adapted for use in England. METHODS: A pilot cluster randomised controlled trial and interviews with teachers were carried out in 19 primary schools in South West England. Participants included 679 children in year 5 (age 9-10). Baseline and follow-up assessments were completed for 323 children (screen viewing) and 472 children (body mass index). Sixteen lessons on healthy eating, physical activity and reducing TV viewing were taught over 5 months by teachers. Main outcome measures were hours of screen activities, body mass index, mode of transport to school and teachers' views of the intervention. RESULTS:Children from intervention schools spent less time on screen-viewing activities after the intervention but these differences were imprecisely estimated: mean difference in minutes spent on screen viewing at the end of the intervention (intervention schools minus control schools) adjusted for baseline levels and clustering within schools was -11.6 (95% CI -42.7 to 19.4) for a week day and was -15.4 (95% CI -57.5 to 26.8) for a Saturday. There was no difference in mean body mass index or the odds of obesity. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to transfer this US school-based intervention to UK schools, and it may be effective in reducing the time children spend on screen-based activities. The study has provided information for a full-scale trial, which would require 50 schools ( approximately 1250 pupils) to detect effects on screen viewing and body mass index over 2 years of follow-up.
Authors: Amy van Grieken; Nicole P M Ezendam; Winifred D Paulis; Johannes C van der Wouden; Hein Raat Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2012-05-28 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Debbie A Lawlor; Russell Jago; Sian M Noble; Catherine R Chittleborough; Rona Campbell; Julie Mytton; Laura D Howe; Tim J Peters; Ruth R Kipping Journal: Trials Date: 2011-07-24 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Mine Yildirim; Maartje M van Stralen; Mai J M Chinapaw; Johannes Brug; Willem van Mechelen; Jos W R Twisk; Saskia J Te Velde Journal: Int J Pediatr Obes Date: 2011-06-09
Authors: Emma Mead; Tamara Brown; Karen Rees; Liane B Azevedo; Victoria Whittaker; Dan Jones; Joan Olajide; Giulia M Mainardi; Eva Corpeleijn; Claire O'Malley; Elizabeth Beardsmore; Lena Al-Khudairy; Louise Baur; Maria-Inti Metzendorf; Alessandro Demaio; Louisa J Ells Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-22
Authors: Russell Jago; Mark J Edwards; Ashley R Cooper; Kenneth R Fox; Jane Powell; Simon J Sebire; Melissa Spears; Janice L Thompson; Alan A Montgomery Journal: Trials Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 2.279