Literature DB >> 18250613

National Cholesterol Educational Program and International Diabetes Federation diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome in an Italian cohort: results from the FIBAR Study.

E Mannucci1, M Monami, G Bardini, A Ognibene, C M Rotella.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The adoption of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria for metabolic syndrome (MS), in comparison with the National Cholesterol Educational Program (NCEP) criteria, produces different changes in estimates of prevalence in diverse populations. Few data are available in Caucasian non-diabetic subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The prevalence of NCEP- and IDF-defined MS was assessed in a sample of 2,945 individuals, aged 55.2+/-11.5 yr, enrolled in a screening program for diabetes. Association of different definitions of MS with glucose intolerance (120-min glucose 7.8 mmol/l after a 75 g-oral glucose load) and hyperuricemia (>0.38 mmol/l) was also assessed.
RESULTS: The prevalence of MS was 16.6% and 29.7% with NCEP and IDF definitions, respectively. The prevalence of NCEP-defined MS was higher than IDF-MS through all age ranges; among those aged >60 yr, the prevalence of IDF-MS reached 52.8% (vs 33.1% for NCEP-MS). Both NCEP- and IDF-MS were associated with glucose intolerance and hyperuricemia. Individuals fulfilling IDF, but not NCEP criteria for MS, showed a prevalence of glucose intolerance (22.7%) significantly (p<0.05) lower than those fulfilling NCEP criteria only (31.6%) or both sets of criteria (31.8%).
CONCLUSION: In Caucasian subjects without known diabetes, IDF criteria produce a relevant increase in estimates of prevalence of MS, particularly in older subjects, when compared with NCEP criteria. NCEP-MS seems to be more effective than IDF-MS in the identification of glucose intolerant subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18250613     DOI: 10.1007/BF03349239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  27 in total

Review 1.  Definition of metabolic syndrome: Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association conference on scientific issues related to definition.

Authors:  Scott M Grundy; H Bryan Brewer; James I Cleeman; Sidney C Smith; Claude Lenfant
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  American College of Endocrinology position statement on the insulin resistance syndrome.

Authors:  Daniel Einhorn; Gerald M Reaven; Rhoda H Cobin; Earl Ford; Om P Ganda; Yehuda Handelsman; Richard Hellman; Paul S Jellinger; David Kendall; Ronald M Krauss; Naomi D Neufeld; Steven M Petak; Helena W Rodbard; John A Seibel; Donald A Smith; Peter W F Wilson
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  The metabolic syndrome--a new worldwide definition.

Authors:  K George M M Alberti; Paul Zimmet; Jonathan Shaw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 24-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Indexes of abdominal adiposity in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  E Mannucci; S Spila Alegiani; M Monami; E Sarli; A Avogaro
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  B Isomaa; P Almgren; T Tuomi; B Forsén; K Lahti; M Nissén; M R Taskinen; L Groop
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 6.  The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

Authors:  Richard Kahn; John Buse; Ele Ferrannini; Michael Stern
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Value of body fat mass vs anthropometric obesity indices in the assessment of metabolic risk factors.

Authors:  A Bosy-Westphal; C Geisler; S Onur; O Korth; O Selberg; J Schrezenmeir; M J Müller
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

Authors:  K G Alberti; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.359

9.  Fasting plasma glucose and glycated haemoglobin in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  E Mannucci; A Ognibene; I Sposato; M Brogi; G Gallori; G Bardini; F Cremasco; G Messeri; C M Rotella
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  Clustering of dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia, diabetes, and hypertension and its association with fasting insulin and central and overall obesity in a general population. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Investigators.

Authors:  M I Schmidt; R L Watson; B B Duncan; P Metcalf; F L Brancati; A R Sharrett; C E Davis; G Heiss
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 8.694

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of adiponectin and lipoprotein(a) levels in cardiac syndrome X.

Authors:  E Guler; G B Guler; F Kizilirmak; U Batgerel; G G Demir; H M Gunes; O Karaca; Ö Özcan; I Barutcu; M M Turkmen; A M Esen
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil and ramipril in elderly mild to moderate essential hypertensive patients with or without metabolic syndrome: a pooled post hoc analysis of two comparative trials.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Ettore Malacco; Jean-Michel Mallion; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Metabolic syndrome in the Mediterranean region: Current status.

Authors:  Panagiotis Anagnostis
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.