Literature DB >> 18248746

Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up.

Samuel A Antuña1, John W Sperling, Robert H Cofield.   

Abstract

Significant discrepancy in the functional outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures has been reported with short or mid-term follow-up. This study reports the long-term results and rate of complications of shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. The review comprised 57 patients (44 women, 13 men) who underwent hemiarthroplasty between 1976 and 1996 as treatment of a proximal humerus fracture and who had a minimum 5-year follow-up (mean, 10.3 years). The mean patient age was 66 years at the time of surgery (range, 23-89 years). According to a modified Neer result rating system, results were satisfactory in 27 patients and unsatisfactory in 30. The mean active elevation was 100 degrees (range, 20 degrees -180 degrees ) and external rotation was 30 degrees (range, 0 degrees -90 degrees ). At the most recent follow-up, 9 patients (16%) had moderate or severe pain and 2 required implant revision or removal. The study data suggest that patients undergoing arthroplasty as treatment of an acute fracture of the proximal humerus may achieve satisfactory long-term pain relief; however, the result for overall shoulder motion is less predictable. In view of these results, current indications, surgical technique, and postoperative treatment may need to be revisited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18248746     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  53 in total

1.  Open reduction and internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty in the management of proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Robert Thorsness; James Iannuzzi; Katia Noyes; Stephen Kates; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

2.  Surgical treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Andreas Platz; Matthias Erschbamer; Thomas Lattmann; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: an update on indications, technique, results and complication rates.

Authors:  Lorenzo Mattei; Stefano Mortera; Chiara Arrigoni; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

4.  Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for complex humeral fractures: a 5 to 10-year follow-up retrospective study.

Authors:  M Giovale; T Mangano; E Rodà; I Repetto; P Cerruti; E Kuqi; F Franchin
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-03-23

5.  Timing of shoulder arthroplasty in comminuted proximal humerus fracture, how much does it matter?

Authors:  Amr Mohamed Abdelhady
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-07-01

6.  Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures: analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes at midterm follow-up: a series of 51 patients.

Authors:  Ph Valenti; D Aliani; Ch Maroun; J D Werthel; K Elkolti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-03-27

7.  Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Thomas J Kryzak; John W Sperling; Cathy D Schleck; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Early Versus Late Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Adam Seidl; Daniel Sholder; William Warrender; Michael Livesey; Gerald Williams; Joseph Abboud; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-07

Review 9.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture.

Authors:  Brandon J Kelly; Chad M Myeroff
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-04

10.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate and fibular strut allograft.

Authors:  Karnav Panchal; Jae-Jung Jeong; Sang-Eun Park; Weon-Yoo Kim; Hyung-Ki Min; Ju-Yeong Kim; Jong-Hun Ji
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.