Literature DB >> 18248133

Goal neglect and Spearman's g: competing parts of a complex task.

John Duncan1, Alice Parr, Alexandra Woolgar, Russell Thompson, Peter Bright, Sally Cox, Sonia Bishop, Ian Nimmo-Smith.   

Abstract

In goal neglect, a person ignores some task requirement though being able to describe it. Goal neglect is closely related to general intelligence or C. Spearman's (1904) g (J. Duncan, H. Emslie, P. Williams, R. Johnson, & C. Freer, 1996). The authors tested the role of task complexity in neglect and the hypothesis that different task components in some sense compete for attention. In contrast to many kinds of attentional limits, increasing the real-time demands of one task component does not promote neglect of another. Neither does neglect depend on preparation for different possible events in a block of trials. Instead, the key factor is complexity in the whole body of knowledge specified in task instructions. The authors suggest that as novel activity is constructed, relevant facts, rules, and requirements must be organized into a "task model." As this model increases in complexity, different task components compete for representation, and vulnerable components may be lost. Construction of effective task models is closely linked to g. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18248133     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  41 in total

1.  Fluid intelligence loss linked to restricted regions of damage within frontal and parietal cortex.

Authors:  Alexandra Woolgar; Alice Parr; Rhodri Cusack; Russell Thompson; Ian Nimmo-Smith; Teresa Torralva; Maria Roca; Nagui Antoun; Facundo Manes; John Duncan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The implementation of verbal instructions: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Egbert Hartstra; Simone Kühn; Tom Verguts; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Representational Organization of Novel Task Sets during Proactive Encoding.

Authors:  Ana F Palenciano; Carlos González-García; Juan E Arco; Luiz Pessoa; María Ruz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks.

Authors:  Maggie E Toplak; Richard F West; Keith E Stanovich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

Review 5.  Control of the superior colliculus by the lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Stefan Everling; Kevin Johnston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Insights into human behavior from lesions to the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sara M Szczepanski; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Biological and social influences on cognitive control processes dependent on prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

8.  Same task rules, different responses: Goal neglect, stimulus-response mappings and response modalities.

Authors:  Matthew H Iveson; Yuki Tanida; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

9.  Breaking a habit: a further role of the phonological loop in action control.

Authors:  Erina Saeki; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10

10.  Executive function and fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions.

Authors:  María Roca; Alice Parr; Russell Thompson; Alexandra Woolgar; Teresa Torralva; Nagui Antoun; Facundo Manes; John Duncan
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.