Literature DB >> 1824740

The accuracy of clinical findings and laparoscopy in pelvic inflammatory disease.

J Sellors1, J Mahony, C Goldsmith, D Rath, R Mander, B Hunter, C Taylor, D Groves, H Richardson, M Chernesky.   

Abstract

The accuracy of clinical diagnosis for pelvic inflammatory disease was determined in 95 women who presented with pelvic pain to primary care physicians and then were referred to gynecologists. Laparoscopy or laparotomy with endometrial biopsy and fimbrial minibiopsy revealed that prevalence of pelvic inflammatory was 46% (44/95) and positive and negative predictive values of gynecologists were 74% (23/31) and 67% (43/64) (p = 0.0002). If histopathologic diagnosis was the standard, clinical accuracies of the gynecologists were no better than chance (p = 0.43), suggesting an expectation bias for visual diagnosis. Laparoscopy had a sensitivity of 50% (12/24) and a specificity of 80% (40/50) for salpingitis if the standard was fimbrial histopathologic diagnosis (p = 0.01). These results support the routine use of laparoscopy, supplemented when negative by endometrial and fimbrial minibiopsy, to accurately diagnose pelvic inflammatory disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1824740     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90639-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic inflammatory disease epidemiology: what do we know and what do we need to know?

Authors:  I Simms; J M Stephenson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 2.  An update on pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  J D C Ross
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

4.  Screening for chlamydial infection. Taking stock.

Authors:  J W Sellors
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Limitations of the criteria used to diagnose histologic endometritis in epidemiologic pelvic inflammatory disease research.

Authors:  Rodolfo D Vicetti Miguel; Mamatha Chivukula; Uma Krishnamurti; Antonio J Amortegui; Jeffrey A Kant; Richard L Sweet; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Jaclyn M Phillips; Thomas L Cherpes
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Acute nonspecific abdominal pain: A randomized, controlled trial comparing early laparoscopy versus clinical observation.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Luca Pellegrino; Elisabetta Castagna; Eleonora Farinella; Patrizio Mao
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  How to differentiate acute pelvic inflammatory disease from acute appendicitis ? A decision tree based on CT findings.

Authors:  Kim El Hentour; Ingrid Millet; Emmanuelle Pages-Bouic; Fernanda Curros-Doyon; Nicolas Molinari; Patrice Taourel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A practical approach to the diagnosis of pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Oluwatosin Jaiyeoba; David E Soper
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-07-26

9.  Accuracy of five different diagnostic techniques in mild-to-moderate pelvic inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Hernando Gaitán; Edith Angel; Rodrigo Diaz; Arturo Parada; Lilia Sanchez; Cara Vargas
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002

10.  Performance of clinical and laparoscopic criteria for the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection.

Authors:  J F Peipert; L A Boardman; C J Sung
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.