Literature DB >> 18247354

An iterative knowledge-based scoring function for protein-protein recognition.

Sheng-You Huang1, Xiaoqin Zou.   

Abstract

Using an efficient iterative method, we have developed a distance-dependent knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-protein interactions. The function, referred to as ITScore-PP, was derived using the crystal structures of a training set of 851 protein-protein dimeric complexes containing true biological interfaces. The key idea of the iterative method for deriving ITScore-PP is to improve the interatomic pair potentials by iteration, until the pair potentials can distinguish true binding modes from decoy modes for the protein-protein complexes in the training set. The iterative method circumvents the challenging reference state problem in deriving knowledge-based potentials. The derived scoring function was used to evaluate the ligand orientations generated by ZDOCK 2.1 and the native ligand structures on a diverse set of 91 protein-protein complexes. For the bound test cases, ITScore-PP yielded a success rate of 98.9% if the top 10 ranked orientations were considered. For the more realistic unbound test cases, the corresponding success rate was 40.7%. Furthermore, for faster orientational sampling purpose, several residue-level knowledge-based scoring functions were also derived following the similar iterative procedure. Among them, the scoring function that uses the side-chain center of mass (SCM) to represent a residue, referred to as ITScore-PP(SCM), showed the best performance and yielded success rates of 71.4% and 30.8% for the bound and unbound cases, respectively, when the top 10 orientations were considered. ITScore-PP was further tested using two other published protein-protein docking decoy sets, the ZDOCK decoy set and the RosettaDock decoy set. In addition to binding mode prediction, the binding scores predicted by ITScore-PP also correlated well with the experimentally determined binding affinities, yielding a correlation coefficient of R = 0.71 on a test set of 74 protein-protein complexes with known affinities. ITScore-PP is computationally efficient. The average run time for ITScore-PP was about 0.03 second per orientation (including optimization) on a personal computer with 3.2 GHz Pentium IV CPU and 3.0 GB RAM. The computational speed of ITScore-PP(SCM) is about an order of magnitude faster than that of ITScore-PP. ITScore-PP and/or ITScore-PP(SCM) can be combined with efficient protein docking software to study protein-protein recognition. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18247354     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  81 in total

1.  Ion sensing in the RCK1 domain of BK channels.

Authors:  Guohui Zhang; Sheng-You Huang; Junqiu Yang; Jingyi Shi; Xiao Yang; Alyssa Moller; Xiaoqin Zou; Jianmin Cui
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Scoring and lessons learned with the CSAR benchmark using an improved iterative knowledge-based scoring function.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  Rational truncation of an RNA aptamer to prostate-specific membrane antigen using computational structural modeling.

Authors:  William M Rockey; Frank J Hernandez; Sheng-You Huang; Song Cao; Craig A Howell; Gregory S Thomas; Xiu Ying Liu; Natalia Lapteva; David M Spencer; James O McNamara; Xiaoqin Zou; Shi-Jie Chen; Paloma H Giangrande
Journal:  Nucleic Acid Ther       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.486

Review 4.  Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; David R Hall; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19

5.  Energy design for protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  D V S Ravikant; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  AutoDock CrankPep: combining folding and docking to predict protein-peptide complexes.

Authors:  Yuqi Zhang; Michel F Sanner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation.

Authors:  Sergei Grudinin; Maria Kadukova; Andreas Eisenbarth; Simon Marillet; Frédéric Cazals
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.

Authors:  Sheng-You Huang; Xiaoqin Zou
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  DrugScorePPI webserver: fast and accurate in silico alanine scanning for scoring protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Dennis M Krüger; Holger Gohlke
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Designing coarse grained-and atom based-potentials for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Dror Tobi
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.