Literature DB >> 18246448

Inequality of use of cancer genetics services by members of breast, ovarian and colorectal cancer families in South East Scotland.

Susan M Holloway1, Birgitta Bernhard, Harry Campbell, Roseanne Cetnarskyj, Wayne W K Lam.   

Abstract

Some studies have found a deficiency of male, younger and more socially deprived individuals amongst referrals to and/or attendees at cancer genetics clinics. We investigated this inequality of use of genetics services from data on 4,178 Scottish patients with a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (BOC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) referred from 2000--2006. Some 98% BOC and 60% CRC referrals were female. Median age of female referrals was greater in the CRC than the BOC group (45.3 vs. 38.7 years, P < 0.001). Both groups of referrals were less socially deprived than the general population (P < 0.001) and the CRC less deprived than the BOC group (P < 0.001). Some 88% patients attended the first appointment offered. Attendance was greater in the CRC group (P < 0.001) and in older patients (P < 0.001) and in the BOC group was highly significantly lower in more socially deprived patients (P < 0.001). Male relatives may feel counselling is less relevant and relatives of both sexes may delay counselling until approaching the age of onset of cancer in a relative. We suggest that medical professionals and the general public may have more knowledge about the genetics of BOC than of CRC. Thus relatives in CRC families seeking counselling are likely to be those with access to more information. The lower attendance amongst more deprived relatives in BOC families may result from poor understanding of the reason for referral. These findings confirm the need to provide male, younger and more socially deprived relatives with more helpful information on cancer genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18246448     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9184-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  18 in total

1.  Non-attendance at general practices and outpatient clinics.

Authors:  D J Sharp; W Hamilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-10

2.  Deprivation and health in Scotland.

Authors:  V Carstairs; R Morris
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1990-07

3.  Referrals of patients to colorectal cancer genetics services in south-east Scotland.

Authors:  Susan Holloway; Mary Porteous; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Robert Rush; Sally Appleton; Dermot Gorman; Harry Campbell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic.

Authors:  V Collins; J Halliday; R Warren; R Williamson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Non-attendance at outpatient clinics: is it related to the referral process?

Authors:  M Lloyd; C Bradford; S Webb
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Factors associated with appointment keeping in a family practice residency clinic.

Authors:  C M Smith; B P Yawn
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  Improving access to cancer genetics services in primary care: socio-economic data from North Kirklees.

Authors:  J Srinivasa; E Rowett; N Dharni; H Bhatt; M Day; C E Chu
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme.

Authors:  E Amir; D G Evans; A Shenton; F Lalloo; A Moran; C Boggis; M Wilson; A Howell
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  What motivates interest in attending a familial cancer genetics clinic?

Authors:  L Fraser; S Bramald; C Chapman; C Chu; V Cornelius; F Douglas; A Lucassen; A Nehammer; S Sutton; M Trivella; S Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.446

10.  Referrals of women with a family history of breast cancer from primary care to cancer genetics services in South East Scotland.

Authors:  H Campbell; S Holloway; R Cetnarskyj; E Anderson; R Rush; A Fry; D Gorman; M Steel; M Porteous
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Who is being referred to cancer genetic counseling? Characteristics of counselees and their referral.

Authors:  E van Riel; S van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-17

2.  Differences in Cancer Phenotypes Among Frequent CHEK2 Variants and Implications for Clinical Care-Checking CHEK2.

Authors:  Brittany L Bychkovsky; Nihat B Agaoglu; Carolyn Horton; Jing Zhou; Amal Yussuf; Parichehr Hemyari; Marcy E Richardson; Colin Young; Holly LaDuca; Deborah L McGuinness; Rochelle Scheib; Judy E Garber; Huma Q Rana
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 33.006

3.  Examining the uptake of predictive BRCA testing in the UK; findings and implications.

Authors:  Karen Lynn Greenhalgh; Munir Pirmohamed; Antony P Martin; Jennifer Downing; Brendan Collins; Brian Godman; Ana Alfirevic
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.246

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.