Literature DB >> 11149615

Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic.

V Collins1, J Halliday, R Warren, R Williamson.   

Abstract

Multi-disciplinary familial cancer clinics are becoming an integral part of cancer services. It is, therefore, important to assess how attendance at these clinics impacts on cancer-related concerns, risk perceptions and behavioural intentions, and how the clinic services are being received by those using them. This study has assessed a familial colorectal cancer clinic with respect to cancer-related worries and risk perceptions and their impact on interest in DNA testing and overall satisfaction with the clinic. Pre- and post-clinic questionnaires were completed by 127 patients and relatives attending the clinic. After attending the clinic, the proportion of people 'very' or 'extremely' worried about developing bowel cancer reduced from 49 (pre-clinic) to 34% (p = 0.002). Worry about bowel cancer was positively associated with younger age, higher education level and higher perceived risk of developing cancer. A reduction in level of risk perception correlated with a lower likelihood of feeling 'very worried' about developing bowel cancer. Of those intending to go ahead with DNA testing, 58% were 'very worried' about bowel cancer compared with 15% of those not intending to proceed with testing, suggesting that worry was a motivation for interest in DNA testing. One-third of participants indicated another session of genetic counselling would be helpful. Within this group, a higher proportion was very worried about bowel cancer (43%) than for those who did not want another session (17%). Attendance at this familial colorectal cancer clinic alleviated worry for many individuals, partly due to improved information about risk of colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11149615     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580606.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  25 in total

1.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  Cathrine Bjorvatn; Geir Egil Eide; Berit Rokne Hanestad; Nina Øyen; Odd E Havik; Anniken Carlsson; Gunilla Berglund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The challenge of developmentally appropriate care: predictive genetic testing in young people for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Rony E Duncan; Lynn Gillam; Julian Savulescu; Robert Williamson; John G Rogers; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Pancreatic cancer risk counselling and screening: impact on perceived risk and psychological functioning.

Authors:  Christine Maheu; Andrea Vodermaier; Heidi Rothenmund; Steve Gallinger; Paola Ardiles; Kara Semotiuk; Spring Holter; Saumea Thayalan; Mary Jane Esplen
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Scoring and psychometric properties of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ), an instrument to assess satisfaction and compliance with glaucoma treatment.

Authors:  Antoine Regnault; Muriel Viala-Danten; Hélène Gilet; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 6.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Risk perceptions among participants undergoing lung cancer screening: baseline results from the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Elyse R Park; Jamie S Ostroff; William Rakowski; Ilana F Gareen; Michael A Diefenbach; Sandra Feibelmann; Nancy A Rigotti
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-08-27

Review 8.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Han G Brunner; Floris W Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Colorectal cancer in the family: psychosocial distress and social issues in the years following genetic counselling.

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Fred H Menko; Irma Kluijt; Babs G Taal; Miranda A Gerritsma; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  A survey on worries of pregnant women--testing the German version of the Cambridge worry scale.

Authors:  Juliana J Petersen; Michael A Paulitsch; Corina Guethlin; Jochen Gensichen; Albrecht Jahn
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-28       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.