Literature DB >> 18245013

CT screening for lung cancer: update 2007.

Claudia I Henschke1, David F Yankelevitz.   

Abstract

Screening is the pursuit of the early diagnosis of cancer before symptoms occur. The purpose of early diagnosis is to provide early treatment, which potentially prevents death from the cancer. The usefulness of screening depends on how early the cancer can be diagnosed and how many deaths can be prevented by early treatment as compared with later symptom-prompted diagnosis and treatment. The goal of the Early Lung Cancer Action Project investigators was to develop an efficient methodology that would provide an ever-accumulating, continually updated body of evidence for evaluation of emerging new technologies for screening for cancer. This methodology recognizes that screening is a sequential process that starts with the pursuit of the early diagnosis of cancer followed by early treatment. It also recognizes that diagnostic research is fundamentally different from treatment research. To fully understand the current discussions on the evidence for lung cancer screening, key definitions are provided, including the differentiation between the first, baseline round of screening and all subsequent rounds of repeat screening and baseline and repeat cancers and their distribution by cell type. These definitions are critical in analyzing the results of various screening reports as they are not used by all. To provide optimal screening, a regimen for the diagnostic workup must be specified starting with the definition of the initial test, its positive result, and the workup for a positive result leading to a diagnosis of cancer. Assessment of diagnostic performance does not require a control group, but does require confirmation of the diagnosis. For assessment of the effectiveness of early treatment, a comparison group is needed. The comparison group may be formed by randomly assigning people with screen-diagnosed lung cancer to immediate or delayed treatment, as has been done for prostate cancer. This provides a direct assessment of any potential overdiagnosis of the cancer resulting from screening. Alternatively, a quasiexperimental control group can be used consisting of participants diagnosed with the cancer who have refused or delayed their treatment even though they are candidates for it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18245013     DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  16 in total

1.  Cancer risks after radiation exposure in middle age.

Authors:  Igor Shuryak; Rainer K Sachs; David J Brenner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Evaluation of the clinical application of multiple tumor marker protein chip in the diagnostic of lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Wang; Yi Zhang; Liangqi Sun; Shuaiping Wang; Jing Nie; Wenqing Zhao; Guobao Zheng
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  A clinicopathological study of resected non-small cell lung cancers 2 cm or less in diameter: a prognostic assessment.

Authors:  Chun-Lei Shi; Xue-Yan Zhang; Bao-Hui Han; Wei-Zhong He; Jie Shen; Tian-Qing Chu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  A Gene Expression Classifier from Whole Blood Distinguishes Benign from Malignant Lung Nodules Detected by Low-Dose CT.

Authors:  Andrew V Kossenkov; Rehman Qureshi; Noor B Dawany; Jayamanna Wickramasinghe; Qin Liu; R Sonali Majumdar; Celia Chang; Sandy Widura; Trisha Kumar; Wen-Hwai Horng; Eric Konnisto; Gerard Criner; Jun-Chieh J Tsay; Harvey Pass; Sai Yendamuri; Anil Vachani; Thomas Bauer; Brian Nam; William N Rom; Michael K Showe; Louise C Showe
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  SOX17 methylation inhibits its antagonism of Wnt signaling pathway in lung cancer.

Authors:  Dongtao Yin; Yan Jia; Yuanzi Yu; Malcolm V Brock; James G Herman; Chao Han; Xiaomo Su; Yang Liu; Mingzhou Guo
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 6.  Risk factors assessment and risk prediction models in lung cancer screening candidates.

Authors:  Mariusz Adamek; Ewa Wachuła; Sylwia Szabłowska-Siwik; Agnieszka Boratyn-Nowicka; Damian Czyżewski
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

7.  Identification of lung cancer with high sensitivity and specificity by blood testing.

Authors:  Petra Leidinger; Andreas Keller; Sabrina Heisel; Nicole Ludwig; Stefanie Rheinheimer; Veronika Klein; Claudia Andres; Andrea Staratschek-Jox; Jürgen Wolf; Erich Stoelben; Bernhard Stephan; Ingo Stehle; Jürg Hamacher; Hanno Huwer; Hans-Peter Lenhof; Eckart Meese
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2010-02-10

8.  Lung Cancer: Are we up to the Challenge?

Authors:  Luca Esposito; Daniele Conti; Ramyasri Ailavajhala; Nansie Khalil; Antonio Giordano
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.236

9.  Cost of a 5-year lung cancer survivor: symptomatic tumour identification vs proactive computed tomography screening.

Authors:  A W Castleberry; D Smith; C Anderson; A J Rotter; F W Grannis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  miRNAs in lung cancer - studying complex fingerprints in patient's blood cells by microarray experiments.

Authors:  Andreas Keller; Petra Leidinger; Anne Borries; Anke Wendschlag; Frank Wucherpfennig; Matthias Scheffler; Hanno Huwer; Hans-Peter Lenhof; Eckart Meese
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.