Literature DB >> 18244257

Testing the limitations of 2-D companding for strain imaging using phantoms.

P Chaturvedi1, M F Insana, T J Hall.   

Abstract

Companding may be used as a technique for generating low-noise strain images. It involves warping radio-frequency echo fields in two dimensions and at several spatial scales to minimize decorrelation errors in correlation-based displacement estimates. For the appropriate experimental conditions, companding increases the sensitivity and dynamic range of strain images without degrading contrast or spatial resolution significantly. In this paper, we examine the conditions that limit the effectiveness of 2-D local companding through a series of experiments using phantoms with tissue-like acoustic and elasticity properties. We found that strain noise remained relatively unchanged as the applied compression increased to 5% of the phantom height, while target contrast increased in proportion to the compression. Controlling the image noise at high compressions improves target visibility over the broad range induced in elastically heterogeneous media, such as biological tissues. Compressions greater than 5% introduce large strains and complex motions that reduce the effectiveness of companding. Control of boundary conditions and ultrasonic data sampling rates is critical for a successful implementation of our algorithms.

Year:  1998        PMID: 18244257     DOI: 10.1109/58.710585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  20 in total

1.  Adaptive clutter rejection filtering in ultrasonic strain-flow imaging.

Authors:  Christian Kargel; Gernot Höbenreich; Birgit Trummer; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Ultrasound elastography based on multiscale estimations of regularized displacement fields.

Authors:  Claire Pellot-Barakat; Frédérique Frouin; Michael F Insana; Alain Herment
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Volumetric elasticity imaging with a 2-D CMUT array.

Authors:  Ted G Fisher; Timothy J Hall; Satchi Panda; Michael S Richards; Paul E Barbone; Jingfeng Jiang; Jeff Resnick; Steve Barnes
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Coded pulse excitation for ultrasonic strain imaging.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Ultrasonic tracking of acoustic radiation force-induced displacements in homogeneous media.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Stephen A McAleavey; Gregg E Trahey; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Intra-operative ultrasound hand-held strain imaging for the visualization of ablations produced in the liver with a toroidal HIFU transducer: first in vivo results.

Authors:  J Chenot; D Melodelima; W A N'djin; Rémi Souchon; M Rivoire; J Y Chapelon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity.

Authors:  Peter N T Wells; Hai-Dong Liang
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  pH-induced contrast in viscoelasticity imaging of biopolymers.

Authors:  R D Yapp; M F Insana
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Ultrasound 2D Strain Estimator Based on Image Registration for Ultrasound Elastography.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Yang; Mylin Torres; Stephanie Kirkpatrick; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-20

10.  A freehand ultrasound elastography system with tracking for in vivo applications.

Authors:  Pezhman Foroughi; Hyun-Jae Kang; Daniel A Carnegie; Mark G van Vledder; Michael A Choti; Gregory D Hager; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.