Literature DB >> 18244230

Comparison between the effects of cavitation induced by two different pressure-time shock waveform pulses.

E Cathignol1, J Tavakkoli, A Birer, A Arefiev.   

Abstract

Acoustic cavitation generates very large localized pressures and temperatures, and thus provides a mechanism whereby physical and biological effects are produced in a high-intensity acoustic field. In this work, we studied the influence of the temporal form of a pressure pulse waveform on the destructive effects of transient cavitation. Two different shock pressure-time waveforms with nearly the same acoustic energy content were used. The first pressure waveform starts with a tensile wave followed by a compressive one, and the second pressure waveform starts with a compressive wave followed by a tensile one. These two pressure waveforms are called direct and inverse-mode pulses respectively. Based on the measurements presented in this work, we can state that, between the two types of shock pressure pulses studied, the direct-mode pulse amplifies systematically tile cavitation effect. This conclusion was achieved from a series of several quantitative and qualitative experiments: cavitation bubble collapse time, disintegration efficacy of plaster balls (a kidney stone-mimicking material), macroscopic study of lesions in agar gel and in vitro isolated rabbit liver tissue destruction. Considering these results and those obtained by other research groups, we can express that the temporal form of a shock pressure pulse has a major role on the cavitation effects.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 18244230     DOI: 10.1109/58.677729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  6 in total

1.  Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves.

Authors:  Yuriy A Pishchalnikov; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; James C Williams; Robin O Cleveland; Tim Colonius; Lawrence A Crum; Andrew P Evan; James A McAteer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles.

Authors:  Shin Yoshizawa; Teiichiro Ikeda; Akira Ito; Ryuhei Ota; Shu Takagi; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Simulation of nonlinear propagation of biomedical ultrasound using pzflex and the Khokhlov-Zabolotskaya-Kuznetsov Texas code.

Authors:  Shan Qiao; Edward Jackson; Constantin C Coussios; Robin O Cleveland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Histotripsy Lesion Formation Using an Ultrasound Imaging Probe Enabled by a Low-Frequency Pump Transducer.

Authors:  Kuang-Wei Lin; Timothy L Hall; Zhen Xu; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  An Analysis of Sonothrombolysis and Cavitation for Retracted and Unretracted Clots Using Microbubbles Versus Low-Boiling-Point Nanodroplets.

Authors:  Jinwook Kim; Kathlyne Jayne B Bautista; Ryan M Deruiter; Leela Goel; Xiaoning Jiang; Zhen Xu; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  In-vitro cell treatment with focused shockwaves-influence of the experimental setup on the sound field and biological reaction.

Authors:  Kristin Dietz-Laursonn; Rainer Beckmann; Siegfried Ginter; Klaus Radermacher; Matías de la Fuente
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2016-03-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.