Literature DB >> 18241197

Faculty teaching time: a comparison of web-based and face-to-face graduate nursing courses.

Katherine M Andersen1, Melissa D Avery.   

Abstract

Web-based education brings a new dimension to the issue of measuring faculty workload. Current literature reflects instructor concerns related to the time required to teach web-based courses (McAlpine, Lockerbie, Ramsay & Beaman 2002; Sellani & Harrington, 2002; Smith, Ferguson & Caris, 2001). This descriptive, comparative study seeks to determine the time required to teach web-based graduate nursing courses and compare that to teaching similar courses in the face-to-face setting. Utilizing time records previously collected as part of a federally funded grant, data from 11 web-based and five face-to-face graduate level nursing courses were analyzed. Although a statistically significant difference in teaching time requirements was not demonstrated, several interesting trends did appear. Examples include differences related to preparation time and the division of teacher time while teaching web-based as opposed to face-to-face courses. Future research and continued data collection related to faculty workload and time usage will be needed as web-based courses become a growing part of graduate nursing education.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18241197      PMCID: PMC2920737          DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.1539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh        ISSN: 1548-923X


  13 in total

1.  The transition to Web-based education: enhancing access to graduate education for women's health providers.

Authors:  Melissa D Avery; Debbie Ringdahl; Catherine Juve; Peg Plumbo
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Redesigning courses for the World Wide Web.

Authors:  Katherine Camacho Carr; Cynthia L Farley
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  Reflections on the role of faculty in distance learning and changing pedagogies.

Authors:  Marilyn Ryan; Kay Hodson Carlton; Nagia S Ali
Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

4.  Increasing nursing faculty in rural Texas through online education.

Authors:  Kathleen M Baldwin; Charles Walker; Elaine Evans
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.726

5.  Web-enhanced and face-to-face classroom instructional methods: effects on course outcomes and student satisfaction.

Authors:  Vincent L Salyers
Journal:  Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh       Date:  2005-12-05

6.  Designing courses for the Internet. A conceptual approach.

Authors:  K H Carlton; M E Ryan; L L Siktberg
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.082

7.  Evaluation of traditional classroom teaching methods versus course delivery via the World Wide Web.

Authors:  M Ryan; K H Carlton; N S Ali
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.726

8.  A framework for assessing outcomes and practices in Web-based courses in nursing.

Authors:  D M Billings
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.726

9.  Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. World Wide Web-based baccalaureate nursing research course.

Authors:  A R Leasure; L Davis; S L Thievon
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.726

10.  Evaluation of classroom-based, Web-enhanced, and Web-based distance learning nutrition courses for undergraduate nursing.

Authors:  Kathleen M Buckley
Journal:  J Nurs Educ       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.726

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the effect of web-based, simulation-based, and conventional training on the accuracy of visual estimation of postpartum hemorrhage volume on midwifery students: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Masoumeh Kordi; Farzaneh Rashidi Fakari; Seyed Reza Mazloum; Talaat Khadivzadeh; Farideh Akhlaghi; Mahmoud Tara
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2016-06-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.