OBJECTIVE: Physical activity (PA) begins to decline in adolescence with a concomitant increase in weight. We hypothesized that a vicious circle may arise between decreasing PA and weight gain from adolescence to early adulthood. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: PA and self-perceived physical fitness assessed in adolescents (16-18 years of age) were used to predict the development of obesity (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)) and abdominal obesity (waist >/=88 cm in females and > or =102 cm in males) at age 25 in 4,240 twin individuals (90% of twins born in Finland, 1975-1979). Ten 25-year-old monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs who were discordant for obesity (with a 16 kg weight difference) were then carefully evaluated for current PA (using a triaxial accelerometer), total energy expenditure (TEE, assessed by means of the doubly labeled water (DLW) method), and basal metabolic rate (BMR, assessed by indirect calorimetry). RESULTS: Physical inactivity in adolescence strongly predicted the risk for obesity (odds ratio (OR) 3.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-10.9) and abdominal obesity (4.8, 1.9-12.0) at age 25, even after adjusting for baseline and current BMI. Poor physical fitness in adolescence also increased the risk for overall obesity (5.1, 2.0-12.7) and abdominal obesity (3.2, 1.5-6.7) in adulthood. Physical inactivity was both causative and secondary to the development of obesity discordance in the MZ pairs. TEE did not differ between the MZ co-twins. PA was lower whereas BMR was higher in the obese co-twins. DISCUSSION: Physical inactivity in adolescence strongly and independently predicts total (and especially) abdominal obesity in young adulthood, favoring the development of a self-perpetuating vicious circle of obesity and physical inactivity. Physical activity should therefore be seriously recommended for obesity prevention in the young.
OBJECTIVE: Physical activity (PA) begins to decline in adolescence with a concomitant increase in weight. We hypothesized that a vicious circle may arise between decreasing PA and weight gain from adolescence to early adulthood. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: PA and self-perceived physical fitness assessed in adolescents (16-18 years of age) were used to predict the development of obesity (BMI > or =30 kg/m(2)) and abdominal obesity (waist >/=88 cm in females and > or =102 cm in males) at age 25 in 4,240 twin individuals (90% of twins born in Finland, 1975-1979). Ten 25-year-old monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs who were discordant for obesity (with a 16 kg weight difference) were then carefully evaluated for current PA (using a triaxial accelerometer), total energy expenditure (TEE, assessed by means of the doubly labeled water (DLW) method), and basal metabolic rate (BMR, assessed by indirect calorimetry). RESULTS: Physical inactivity in adolescence strongly predicted the risk for obesity (odds ratio (OR) 3.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-10.9) and abdominal obesity (4.8, 1.9-12.0) at age 25, even after adjusting for baseline and current BMI. Poor physical fitness in adolescence also increased the risk for overall obesity (5.1, 2.0-12.7) and abdominal obesity (3.2, 1.5-6.7) in adulthood. Physical inactivity was both causative and secondary to the development of obesity discordance in the MZ pairs. TEE did not differ between the MZ co-twins. PA was lower whereas BMR was higher in the obese co-twins. DISCUSSION: Physical inactivity in adolescence strongly and independently predicts total (and especially) abdominal obesity in young adulthood, favoring the development of a self-perpetuating vicious circle of obesity and physical inactivity. Physical activity should therefore be seriously recommended for obesity prevention in the young.
Authors: Kirsi H Pietiläinen; Aila Rissanen; Maria Laamanen; Anna-Kaisa Lindholm; Harri Markkula; Hannele Yki-Järvinen; Jaakko Kaprio Journal: Twin Res Date: 2004-10
Authors: Sue Y S Kimm; Nancy W Glynn; Eva Obarzanek; Andrea M Kriska; Stephen R Daniels; Bruce A Barton; Kiang Liu Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jul 23-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James A Levine; Lorraine M Lanningham-Foster; Shelly K McCrady; Alisa C Krizan; Leslie R Olson; Paul H Kane; Michael D Jensen; Matthew M Clark Journal: Science Date: 2005-01-28 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jeanne M McCaffery; George D Papandonatos; Dale S Bond; Michael J Lyons; Rena R Wing Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Michael C Robertson; Charles E Green; Yue Liao; Casey P Durand; Karen M Basen-Engquist Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Zhenshan Wang; Vicky Li; Guy C K Chan; Trongha Phan; Aaron S Nudelman; Zhengui Xia; Daniel R Storm Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Amra C Alibegovic; Lise Højbjerre; Mette P Sonne; Gerrit van Hall; Bente Stallknecht; Flemming Dela; Allan Vaag Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Annette E Maxwell; Walid El Ansari; Christiane Stock; Janina Petkeviciene; Francisco Guillen-Grima Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-01-27 Impact factor: 3.295